http://eskesthai.blogspot.com
Sometimes a Phase Transition can occur where the super-critical paramiter (near equilibrium) can allow the Universe to be expanding, as it is now, and if one rewinds the Universe, one does not produce a Universe of contraction?..the Phase (expanding)is maintained under reversal. If one takes the Space Vacuum to be expanding, follow the energy backwards in time to close to the BB, and the Universe is STILL expanding, it is NOT contracting/collapsing?
At a precise moment in the far distant past, the Universe is compact, the space between matter/nuclie, is "squeezed" out of local positive matter, but the Space external to matter is now teetering along a "super-critical" state?..it is still EXPANDING (think of water being expelled from a sponge?)..but the external space vacuum is now producing a density that is Negative?
Now the Vacuum is COLLAPSING?..not ordinary matter, as the vacuum contracts/collapse's..it "pulls" matter away from the big-bang, but it does not get drawn out..it "appears" out of the collapsing vacuum, the moment it appears it is given a "phase-identity"..this is positive, positive matter!
It is important to Understand that phase transition, dictates states..Liquid..Gas..Solid?
All of matter is positive and in Solid format. All of Space is positive, and in Gas(Vacuum) State. All of the Universe's Dimensions, where interactions occur, can be thought of as Solid, Liquid and Gas exchange interactions.
Thank you Paul, that was very helpful to remember.
Sometimes when the relationship spelt out by Moshe and his article, that Sean was quick to point out, reveals indicators(spin orientations) as to what symmetries are in relation to dimensional perspective.
I have picked one.
This is the questioning that is occuring in my mind, that is married to actual mathematical discriptions that help move perspective in those abstract spaces.
Follow a line over these complex forms of Sylvestor surfaces and you soon see that such surfaces are intriguing.
You and I might talk about the effects of the Casimere plates in relation or how the "true vacuum," reveals the dynamics taking place, while I am indeed more focused on the effects of geometrical propensities of collapse and expansion in supernova states.
I am also focused in microstates(partile reductionism) as well, and your discriptions are helpful reminders. Thanks.
Insight needed to explain number theory fact? If one take the spin 1/2, 1,2.. then the actual process of how these spins are allocated their numbering?
Take the base number system using 10..9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1-0
even,odd,even,odd,even,odd,even,odd,even,odd..zero
?
Zero = EVEN!
You can devide 10 by 2, and 8..all even numbers can be devided by 2.
Devide the lowest number 1, you get two halfs 1/2 + 1/2 with nothing left over. Devide 2 you get double that of 1: 1 + 1 = 1/2 x 4.
Now the really interesting factor is when one devides the lowest even number ZERO!..it increases.
Take a zero-energy with a certain value, devide it and its value INCREASES! the Cosmological Constant runs down via the numbers, but increase's via the lowest EVEN number factor ZERO.
Parity Spin order is..1..2 factors of Odd or Even.
Every mathematical model uses Parity as an understanding of Symmetry, the Inverse Square Law is governed by the starting point?..The Zero.
Why is number theory so reliant upon 10 numbers and 1 Zero ?..why 10 + 1 
On that basis alone I can see what you are saying.
So having understood zero as even, it then forces me to consider the issues in regards to general relativity.
Where is this flat spacetime, and how do we go from there?
This is the question that arises in my mind, so I went looking for situations that might help me there and from, the event choosen, one had to understand the Quark Gluon plasma and what opportunity it presents.
What is being produced from flat spacetime. Strangelets?
Much like ICECUBE, and the recent article I was writing. While high energy particles exist above our atmosphere, collsion course in our atmosphere produces quickly dissipating blackholes, but it also leaves particle for whch we consider, as "particle" in the weak field manifestation. Faster then light entities in the blue glow.
Here there are characteristic valuation in neutrinos, these are held within the context of earth's gravitational field. You see? Gravity is weak here, yet, the "Blue glow" is a important feature.
So if zero is even, flat spacetime and how we got there? We understand 3 of space and 1 of time? The are coordianted references, yet the complication comes when we see each of these directions, have little arrows wrapped each coordnated reference. Yet there is a arrow of time.
Then it becomes really interesting how such dynamics are turning in sequences from a global perspective.
Ths is why Greg Egans animations are so helpful. Do remember the Bose Nova, we had talked about? Remember the funnel, how was that created?
"Do remember the Bose Nova, we had talked about?" of course, I never forget a good conversation!
I will get a number of things up and running, first thing, look at the string-energy factor?..with respect to decomposition, or compacting energy to a specific limit?..when stringtheorists equate the existence of strings, they have decomposed energy from 3-d >>2-d>>1-d?
Now, at this limit, their wquations blow up, literally, their "smallest" fragment starts to increase (thus large particles of energy are predicted, Graviton..and Branes)..the Cosmic-Strings are mathematical
results of this process. What starts to "appear" is extended particle, where the 'Zero' factor starts to run "upwards". From pour 3-D perspective, we cannot see them, why?..because they do not exist in SPACETIME. All 3-D matter ceases in the "zero" dimensional perspective. But I have found an interesting factor relating to Einstiens "Spacetime", one can and SHOULD equate all Space to be WITHIN Time, its not spacetime, its space_in_time, not 3+1, but 3in 1 
Will continue soon.
This has just come to light:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0602061
I have not read it through fully, but noticed it mentions some "geometric" linking that you highlighted?
This also needs a look:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0602048
actually, all of a sudden there are a number of papers tonight:10th feb, that I need to examine more closely, back soon
More on homepage
Your first link to archive of pdf, reminded me of Lee Smolns reference here.
My reference to Cayley and Sylvestor surfaces is part of the dynamics that you and I talked about with reference to Bose Nova. Once you begin to see this way it is not easy to depart from.
So I want to keep it simple between you and I here.
Marrying current experimental research to part of the understanding of the Bose Nova was essential. If you can see this application at work, would be great.
You have provided good incentive here to grasp these concepts, so our connection through the years have be fruitful for me in this way. I would like to return in kind the help you have given.
Leaving the idea of the Bose Nova from that time I wanted to point you to here and here.
I understand you are busy in your progressions, so please anytime in the future is okay. I'll be around.
What was impotrnat is that you see what the superfluids are doing and what they provide for in a gek eotrical perspective as you would see in the Bose Nova. As well, where in reductionism is this point of zero? IN a flat spacetime perspective this creates opportunities to see either way.
Dirac very nicely helps in the matrix perspective, as well as what the "i" can mean in that matrix. You look for these situations. Hoepfully this all made sense?
Paul Dirac and Geometrical Thinking
I am not sure why this link didn't work on my homepage above?
I have yet to speak to your perspective on reduction of dimensional relationship because from a 5d perspectve, reduction can be taken to a 2d(brane perspective) and on that level, then 5d can occupy the mind and infer the 3>>2>>1. A point onthe brane is self explanatory at that point.
I like to refer to Thomas Banchoff often for these dimensonal perspectives. Lee Smolin in that same thread, gave us a link to John Baez's site, but after his, I gave a reference having read John Baez's commentary, found Thomas's could speak to it better using imagery on computer screen 2d reference.
A point on abrane simplifies al that you refeence in term of what that string is. How big the circle /point and it's energy relation and the string takes on varying thicknesses according to the KK tower. Using that point, I am sure will be as relevant to what you are saying.
Thusly I would also like to say thaton simple identification of numbers as you have shown, it is equallyprobable for the emergent property from all probabilite to see how a number system would emerge, as I have shown in the use of Pascal's triangle and th ereference t binomial relationa nd Boltzman is importnat fromthat perspective.
I am afraid I might have unleashed a deluge onto you? I know you will hopefully understand from our years of association.
B.E.C if you go to here:
http://www.freewebs.com/moorglad...glade/
index.htm
then to 'colorado' link,at this site, leave the page load, and follow the instructions to create a b.e.c?
If you get good at moving the "trap-height" down quite fast to about a 1/4 of the way, you should see a pulsed B.E.C, a greyish cloud.
Zero-Point-Energy, a super-solid with a viscosity value that renders it all pervading?
I had posted a number of relevant insights at superstringtheory.com "new" forum, but alas patricia seems to no longer open her doors to threads !
I postulated an energy density of Neutralino-Flux not like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutralino
One has to contemplate an Electro-Magnetic density, that, because of its viscosity, allows certain matter to pass through it, without altering the flux itself
Of course you got me thinking.
I'll put this here for a moment.
You know "zero" now occupies this conversation? While for some it means "nothing," to me either/or, provides for emergent properties(numerical numbers out of Pascal probability structure) to make themself known.
IN Boltzman case?
But zeropoint energy is something that figuratively I saw in regards to analogistic comparison here.
This is a very significant physical result because it tells us that the energy of a system described by a harmonic oscillator potential cannot have zero energy. Physical systems such as atoms in a solid lattice or in polyatomic molecules in a gas cannot have zero energy even at absolute zero temperature. The energy of the ground vibrational state is often referred to as "zero point vibration". The zero point energy is sufficient to prevent liquid helium-4 from freezing at atmospheric pressure, no matter how low the temperature.
I have to get my thoughts together here. Is it consistent with what you are saying, in terms of eneregy valuations. Yet I do see collision processes, as a necessary event with which I call to mind the strangelets, as you might point out the neutrinos.
Neutrinos are also obvious candidates for use in studying quantum gravity effects. Because they are not affected by either the strong nuclear force or electromagnetism, and because they are not normally found in composite particles (unlike quarks) or prone to near instantaneous decay (like many other standard model particles) it is easier to isolate and measure gravitational effects on neutrinos at a quantum level.
I know you said Neutralino, but I had to go here for a second.
I have to provide this link:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/progr...alk/
4631138.stm
the video talk is only 23 minutes, it has Roger Penrose, with a New theory on Big-Bang.
It is not "new" to me, because it is very close to what I have been advocating for a large number of years!
I have more time this week, so I am first going to tackle your new threads, and hopefully invoke some further inquiries.
Paul,
I added your link to the above post and some other information. This will show up later, as the information has to be updated on this forum link server.
I am going to listen to Roger Penrose tomorrow.
Thanks
I listen to the first 5 minutes last night, but since being on dial up, the process is very long and tiredness overtook from working from yestermorning quite early to nighttime.
It is funny in the sense that a man(Penrose) can change his mind after so many years, and so many additions to our thinking. THis is the way I feel too. I could never resolve myself to "nothing" before the singularity.
Understanding now, the supefluid created at the beginning of the universe, the singularity is not "the pea" we so like to refer too, but is a much different view of what laid under the "princesses's mattress to fable thinking" as this lump constantly irritated my thinking.
Nothin in stated form was and always is nothing which would have not allowed any further discussion. "Zero" in our conversation is a much different kind of thinking. and I understood that as well. Zero would have been the equivalent to "i" in the matrices?
I wonder if there is just a audio version of that link?
The additions did not make themselves know so the big bang will have to be added in new post.
There is a good audio here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/
scie...efhistory.shtml
but the Penrose Interview is, as far as I know, only in the link?
In the link for penrose, put your mouse over:click here to watch full video, then right click, then click"save target as"?
That should download the interview to your desktop, and you can watch offline, it is in real player.
Breakthrough! by no other than Gerard T' Hooft:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602076
Hologram, emerging/embedded into the Vacuum?:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602022
this also can be of interest:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0507077
I must stress that Hooft, has a major "problem" in the above paper, although it is phenomological rather than technical, but consequently needs discussion.
Something great,Ashtekar et-al:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602086
Only four pages, but mentions a very relevant observation, based on what I have been stating for some time, pretty accurate calculations?
"Zeno Paradox" is mentioned here to spark your inquisitive mind
I should have linked this above:
http://www.freewebs.com/moorglad...glade/
index.htm
The reason for the blog title:Einsteins Quantum Wave!
In respect to the Zeno Paradox, when a retarted wavefunction is evolved backwards?..it does not collapse/contract, it is in expansion/spread out over Time, but over a LESS-TIME.
Quantum Ranging?
http://wc0.worldcrossing.com/
Web...OxPVX@.1de1ecfc
Hi Paul
there seems to be no way in which to inform me when you have posted using this comment area.
So looking today, I see where the current post aligned with todays date may of be of some interest.
This recent paper has definate status:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604008
I have been trying for some time to find out how to locate some of your posts, but there seems no search or facility for "Date" ie months?
A search in the link at the header of your site does not throw up any links fro releveant threads?
Hi Paul,
I have a search feature at the very bottom of the blog page. As well a blog search feature is at the very top.
I'll try and put the RSS connection on the side.
Back to your other post then
Again a clear insight to a paradine shift:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604265
Commenting by HaloScan
