Grasping at straws, yet again.
*rolls eyes*
That's some impressive argument you have there /sarcasm
Does anyone know were I can obtain a copy of the TV taping of Obama telling the news reporter at (ABC,CBS NBC, etc??? I'm not sure who did the taping) "That he moved into his new neighborhood and this person, (Tony Resko)happened to live there, so they are trying to associate me with him.", like Obama never knew RESKO before this time. (big lie) Factis, RESKO helped him buy this house in Chicago. Reason for the TV interviewers question, was that a bad week that Obama was having during the primary race with Hillary, the news came that RESKO was convicted and Obama was an associate of RESKO. Obama was trying to act as if he never knew RESKO before that time. This tape could show the world that Obama is part of the RESKO crimes. Resko is now in jail for 30 years and his close associate, Obama, may become president. Please help me if you can. Larry
hill@pcssolutions.com
Larry,
Unfortunately, you and Mark are grasping at straws. Obama bought land from Rezko's wife. Note, they bought the land. It wasn't given to him or anything, but he made a legal purchase.
Beyond that, all of Obama's interactions with Rezko occured while Obama was working as a community lawyer on projects that were different from the ones Rezko were indicted for.
And, to deflate your and Mark's claims even more, Obama has donated to charity any and all contributions from Rezko and his associates.
Now, I expect Mark to edit this post, since it hurts his pathetic ego.
Sorry little Shawny but Obama has a bit more shady connection to Rezko than that extremely convenient land deal. Developers/slum lords like Rezko benefited from Obama's political position. While it might be a-ok/quasi-legal in the cesspool of Chicago it certainly is not ethical.
As for one's pathetic ego, how many threads on myspace have you now started or groups have you joined specifically to throw invective at me and/or my gf? Last I saw you didn't even bother to address the points raised in one of my posts that you linked to from Orly. It seems your ego has canceled out your previous monkey trick of not linking directly to my blog to avoid moving me up in google rankings.
And yes, I'll continue to edit you and anyone else that just tries to flame or troll. As you should be aware, I've approved plenty of your comments when you actually tried to make an argument, so don't continue with that lie of yours that I edit comments because I don't like disagreement.
lol, the GOP list you linked to is laughingly pathetic. Slamming Obama for writing a letter of endorsement? It's a strecth to use "cronyism", and hilariously ironic considering what has happened for the past eight years.
Siteowner's replies in bold:
It's rather dishonest of you to act as if that's the only thing my post references. Obama's established relationship to Ayers goes far beyond that and Obama has lied about it. Your little nitpick does nothing to overturn the volume of supporting evidence that the relationship is far more than "scant".
Since you haven't addressed the serious nature of the Ayers/Dohrn/Weatherman crimes and intent, I'll accept that as a concession on your part.
Keep grasping at straws as you face the reality that your chosen candidate is incompetent compared to the other major party's choice.
Considering the media help that Obama has, the reported squalor on his campaign plane despite his loads of cash and the conditions of this election favoring Democrats, it doesn't show competence to have the race so close.
Obama's enabling of outright fraud with the disabling of AVS for online donations may indicate competence if you don't mind encouraging people to break the law.
Obama's work on the CAC also shows he is not competent when throwing other people's money around. There was a negligible affect on student's test scores per the foundation's own review of the work.
Obama's competence at bipartisanship are non-existent. The few examples he touts were either incredibly non-controversial and had wide support or he bailed out on helping to instead hold to the party line, as in with a reform bill McCain was working on.
I know when I've pushed your buttons right when you bring in your online girlfriend into the mix.
Noting that you and others already have done that is simply stating a fact.
So, are you ever going to come back to MySpace, or am I just going to have to continue reminding everyone there of your idiocy by linking to your blog?
That only reminds me of the idiocy that you and too many others prefer over reasoned discussion. That it keeps you looking stupid and obsessed while increasing my blog traffic only emphasises the point.
Your inability to actually address the post in any detail and instead run off topic as a means of deflection is another example. I'll give you this, you are competent at such intellectual dishonesty.
Commenting by HaloScan
