Thanks for this great write-up.
There is a 95% chance that anything "facts" or statements about history and record that comes out of Obama's mouth is a lie.
Not sure if you know of Gov Sarah Palin, but there is a growing support to have her on the McCain ticket. She would be excellent on so many levels.
Please take a look, along with other Conservatives and show your support.
Here are some resources:
http:/wwww.palinforamerica.com
http://mccainpalinforprez.blogspot.com
http://www.ipetitions.com/petiti...ion/palinforvp/
(2600+ petitioners, sign it! Let others know!)
http://mccainpalinforprez.blogspot.com/
keep em coming..great stuff!
Remarkable how many people still don't understand the internet when it comes to lieing. Great post.
Infanticide? Hyperbole much?
Not in this case, try again.
Really? I'm not the one muddling definitions for an emotional appeal while also neglecting specific facts to pad your ego. Have fun.
You really have to coldly parse words about what was going on to get away from it being infanticide. But I know you're intellectually dishonest enough to do so.
I'm not the one charging an elected official with the intentional killing of an infant, eg. infanticide. You are, technically.
You need to learn how to read better, or is it just your intellectual dishonesty showing again?
I'm noting that he did not change a law that would protect said infants, when it was factually within his power to make that law acceptable to himself. The record also shows that he lied about that on several occasions.
The fact of the matter is that Obama, by his own actions and the admission of his campaign, shows he cannot be trusted on such matters.
Why change a law into a law that already previously existed?
Oh, that's right. We need pomp and circumstance from our legislatures to make us feel good while being ignorant of the laws already on the books.
There is much irony in your charge of intellectual dishonesty, when you yourself bare much ignorance on Illinos statutes.
Shawn,
I see you're still evading and trying to deflect from the matter of Obama lying about his extreme abortion record.
Your latest attempt, after misreading my post, I'll chalk up as you just being very under-informed on that matter.
The current law was not sufficient.
http://www.jillstanek.com/
archiv...l_abortion.html
Do try to avoid the ad hom. You look stupid enough already.
Evading about his record for women rights? Ah, that's right. You frame abortion as baby killing, while I frame it in terms of a woman's choice in family planning.
The prior Illinois law was plenty. Your link is a failued analysis. Why? Non-existent loopholes.
http://
factcheck.barackobama.com...orn_alive_1.php
And because I know you'll ad hom my source, so I'll just go ahead and ad hom your moonbat Jill Stanek
http://www.dailykos.com/story/20.../949/510/
571062
So, until you show some source of actual knowledge about public policy in this arena, I'll just chalk you up as a noisy clown in a circus of follying failures.
Shawn, I don't need to stoop to your idiocy. Your link to Obama's page does not respond to the fact that the practices at Christ hospital did not break current law, per the Illinois state attorney, or the consent decree mentioned in what I referenced.
And the facts still show that Obama lied about his vote against the legislation.
Thanks for entertaining me with great failures. I like the ring "Mark the Clown". Do you do any other neat tricks like ignoring case history and the reliability of sources?
Oh, wait. I see you just did that. Nevermind. I'll wait for your next trick.
Thanks for the non-responsive reply to the points raised.
My claim of "hyperbole" is claiming that what Obama supports was infanticide. But sorry you lack the reading comprehension to distinguish that necessary element.
And you're pointing out practices that already broke the current law as if it is now neccessary to make a "new law" that would sound just like the old? Are you simply dense, or does it take effort to get your head so far into the sand?
I already addressed your complaints. Repeating your whining doesn't make it anymore valid or impressive.
And it's incredibily hilarious, your talking about reliable sources oh lover of DailyKos and Earl Doherty you.
*yawn*
You're welcome to come back to the myspace group when you have something of substance, oh pitiful linker to hot air and Holding drone. Until then, fare thee well.
It's about time your ego got tired of losing this discussion.
Commenting by HaloScan
