When he writes that he is knowledgeable about historical criticism you already know all you need to know about him. The fact that he gives a damn about historical criticism, a completely wrongheaded approach to actual, factual history, reveals a typically Marxist confusion between history and propaganda. Maybe he is only a useful idiot, in Lenin's words, or maybe he is every bit as committed, cynical, and evil as Cueball Ulyanov himself, but either way he's part of the cultural Marxist mainstream and should be presumed wrong whenever there is a doubt.
Good luck with him and maybe we can get him to waste some time on me too.
Commenting by HaloScan
