Wait! Why aren't you telling us how WTC 7 really fell instead of attacking her personally? Tell us exactly why WTC 7 fell. Tell us what "pull it" means.
Anyone can just ridicule someone's character. That doesn't take any skill. You should deal with the subject instead.
As I noted, the links provided in the other posts are sufficient. Is that too hard for you to understand or are you too lazy to click and go look?
Rosie is entitled to have an opinion although I think this is ridiculous.
She REALLY should stick with comedy. I must admit the Donald impression was quite funny.
No, I went to the links. They dont explain how BBC reported 7 fell 26 minutes before it actually fell! You don't do much research it appears but you're an expert at posting bubblegum pop gossip.
Your cute little sites and blog doesn't explain....
http://www.freenewmexican.com/re...logs/
57738.html
Kimberly, you should watch....
http://video.google.com/
videopla...press+for+truth
and.....
http://video.google.com/
videopla...271955308136871
then come back and say this is ridiculous. Atleast take the time to look at some of the material for yourself. Make up your own mind then.
John,
I've seen the video in question. News reporters make mistakes all the time, even more so under stressful conditions. Considering that firefighters pulled away from the building because it was so dangerous it's not surprising that a live report, during a traumatic event, would have such an error.
Your silly tactics are typical of conspiracy lunacy.
So, you've seen Press For Truth? It has nothing to do with WTC 7. You've seen it? It was made by the victim's families. Are they "loony"?
Iv'e seen the video regarding the reporter saying wtc7 had collapsed. But thank you for showing the typical conspiracy nut tactic of refusing to concede failure on an issue and then run to another, never noticing their shrinking pile of "evidence" having to support a larger and larger scaffold of conspiracy lunacy.
As for the victim's families, their tragedy does not automatically make them experts or free them from being fooled or guarantee they will not make errors.
Rosie is 100 percent correct and this blog is nonsense.
Oh my! The arguments and data offered by you are soooo impressive.
Is that you Rosie?
Remember - breath - it will prevent oxygen starvation of the brain. Apparently you forgot that before you left that comment.
Mark - you're lying through your teeth you are brainwashed.
What are you talking about? 911 From beginning to end has so many questions that went unanswered. Who are you kidding? no one.
It's lot's of fun approving your comments. You look dumber every time you post one.
btw, your latest drivel is rather funny just for saying I'm lying and I'm brainwashed. If I'm brainwashed I wouldn't know the truth to be otherwise and therefore lying.
You must really enjoy revealing conspiracy nut foolishness all by your little lonesome.
Thanks for saving me the time and effort :D
conspiracy lunacy? are you claiming that the government and mainstream media should never be questioned and they offer 100% truth and accuracty 100% of the time. And everyone in authority is to be trusted 100% of the time and to do otherwise is indulging in "conspiracy lunacy"
That is what you are implying by anyone who has sincere and good intentions about finding out the truth about 911 which even you would have to admit is a noble thing to do.
I am not sure what role the government had in 911 and the wtc fall.
But I do know the building clearly did not look like it fell from fire. I have eyes. I know it looks like it fell from explosives.
The BBC report is to say the least a little odd.
Video of firemen telling people to get away from the building because it was about to "come down" is a little odd.
Larry silverstein saying he and the fire cheif decided to "pull it" ( I don't think Larry was referring to the firefighters as "its" do you?)
Most suspiciously of all however is the government immediatly sending all the rubble to Asia to be recycled immediatly without any investigation of the molten steel.
Just the fact that a building that size was completely demolished from several relatively small fires is odd enough to warrant an investigation into the cause. don'y ya think? Yeah I do to but not the governement.
Why dosen't the media EVER mention the mysterious demolition of building 7? Ever see it replayed on mainstream network tv? me neither?
Why in the world would a president who's country has been attacked to this degree not want a thorough and complete investigation?
There are hundreds of questions like this and either
1. You are completely brainwashed.
2. You have a 75 I.Q. or lower.
or
4. Your benefit financially, politically or otherwise from perpetuating this nonsense.
Unless you are a complete moron which you might be you are equal to a Nazi sympathizer.
as I am sure you are well aware of you sound like the fool.
Saying that 911 has unanswered questions does not equal a conspiracy theory.
you won't even "approve" a comment that raises questions that you can't respond to with an insult.
I really hope this administration has your back for all the disinformation and insults you are spewing at anyone with a brain. good luck with your payoff Mark.
And if you are doing if for free that is even worse. You should be getting some reward for your contribution to stifling the truth.
Bye Mark. Good luck.
And by the way Mark "Mr. Pro-life" on a different subject ( of which you are woefully wrong and ignorant)
Who is going to take care of all of these unwanted babies that you want to force women to have that are created in THEIR bodies and come out of THEIR vaginas. Not yours.
Are you going to take care of them?
How many babies have you personally adopted? A couple I hope.
How much money do you contribute to help raise these babies to teen mothers and those that cannot afford to raise them. Alot I hope. Douchebag loser.
Thanks for providing me with tons of laughs for my blog.
Mark isn't gonna answer the real questions b/c he can't.
If so, why did the firefighters say the building was going to be "BLOWN UP"?
Do the words "BLOW UP" mean "pull the firefighters out"?
John,
Except that I answered every assertion made by another conspiracy nut in a new blog post. Thanks for emphasizing the conspiracy nut condition of willful ignorance. Sometimes I wonder if people like you and that other guy are really plants by Karl to undermine conspiracy theorists. I would ask him but we tend to keep our operations highly compartmentalized.
Your "blow up" question, is not sourced and too vaque to be responded to. It would be the equivalent of my asking why did your mom say she dropped you on your head and damaged your brain if you havent been displaying mental deficiencies with your comments here.
As to one of your videos, a website I've linked to in at least two posts now, addresses the claim that demolition explosions were caught on video. Quit commenting on my blog, if you can't even take the time to do basic research.
Such laziness and desire to remain ignorant is worth nothing more than dismissal or insults when I happened to be bored.
Commenting by HaloScan
