In fairness, that was published on the 31st based on tests done a day before (give or take time zone differences). According to a thread on Wilders, the results were updated by then:

"AntiVir, Avast!, BitDefender, ClamAV, COMMAND, Dr Web, eSafe, eTrust INO, eTrust VET, Ewido, f-Secure, Fortinet, Kaspersky, McAfee, Nod32, Norman, Panda, Sophos, Symantec, trend Micro and VirusBuster recognized now all 73 Samples.Only the scanners of QuickHeal (11 not recognized), AVG (13), f-Prot (54), Ikarus (67) and VBA32 (67) let still infectious WMF files happen unopposed,
that's a Babelfish translation."

Of course there have been a lot more versions since...
Dave | 01.04.06 - 5:10 pm | #

Hmm, Microsoft's OneCare Live! Beta claims to block it.. but I don't know how many variants. Interesting that it was not included in the comparison.
Nicholas | Homepage | 01.05.06 - 2:15 am | #

Are you saying Microsoft is now ENDORSING the third party hotfix? just two days ago it was saying that installng third party hotfixes was playing Russian Roulette, now they say sure go ahead? I'd like to see a link to a statement from microsoft on that.
Rorschach | Homepage | 01.05.06 - 12:52 pm | #