Spin, spin, spin.

- ferg
fergie | Homepage | 02.20.06 - 10:12 pm | #

More like attention grabbing.
Expect this thread (and all other similar ones in other sites) to be multi-posted with the standard 180 canned response we all saw once.
A Chicken Passeth By | 02.21.06 - 12:30 am | #

I swear 180 uses a canned speech (like we use when doing hijackthis logs) and just fills in the blanks...over and over and over.
MicroBell | 02.21.06 - 4:30 am | #

It's such a shame that their business model clearly encourages suce behaviour in the "nefarious elements" of the online community. Fortunately, extreme greed will never prevail.
trickyricky | 02.21.06 - 5:20 am | #

The real problem here is that we are the good guys.

Some days I wish I was willing to DDoS 180 Solutions.

But that'd be playing by their rules.

*sigh*
Derrill | 02.21.06 - 10:45 am | #

Despite an unprecedented effort by some industry critics to keep secret the critical information that would have led to a quicker shutdown of the fraudulent behavior, the company, through its own policing mechanisms, was able to track down the nefarious actor responsible and shut him down.

Oh, shut up. We all know that if they had publicized it like you say you wish they had, you'd be whining how it was such a big problem now because they'd told everyone how to do it.
Drew Mochak | Homepage | 02.21.06 - 9:30 pm | #

> "Thanks to our recently-developed S3 technology, we were able to identify the rogue publisher, immediately shut down the channel,"

I see. So in that case, Mr. Smith, your vaunted "S3 technology" obviated any actual need to get "the critical information" from "some industry critics" then, didn't it? And thus, the slam at "unprecedented effort by some industry critics to keep secret the critical information" was gratuitous and unnecessary then, wasn't it?
Mark Odell | 02.22.06 - 4:16 pm | #

I see that their B.S. machine is still operating in high gear.
Guillermo | 02.24.06 - 1:05 pm | #