Sunbeltblog comments

Gravatar Mr. Eckelberry:

My name is Brian Boyko, Editor at Network Performance Daily (www.networkperformancedaily.com) and I left a voicemail message with you earlier today but thought this might be a way to get in touch with you sooner.

I would like to talk to you about the case and get your expert opinion on it, as well as talk to you about what supporters of Ms. Amero can do next to help her.


Gravatar Alex,

If Heather Armstrong can introduce the term 'dooced' into the urban dictionary and if Robert Bork was the impetus behind the term 'borked', perhaps sometime soon there will the term 'ameroed'... yes, it is a slow neuron day here, at this end of the internet.

Catherine


Gravatar I read recent publications in ABC and Fox news about
16 years old boy in Arizona and his criminal case.

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story...arre& id=4935302


http://www.foxnews.com/story/ 0,2...,244009,00.html

I send you again links to publications about my case.
I was forced to confess to the
possession of internet digital pictures of porn in deleted clusters of
my computer hard drive. My browser was hijacked while I was browsing
the web. I was redirected to illegal sites against my will. Some
illegal pictures were found on my hard drive, recovering in
unallocated clusters, without dates of file creation/download.

I do not know how courts can widely press these charges on people to
convict them, while the whole Internet is a mess.

This is my story in inquisition21.com. There is all
information about case written by Irish writer Brian
Rothery. You can see a lot of violations of law by police

http://www.inquisition21.com/ art...page_num~3.html

This is publication in Wired news

http://www.wired.com/news/ infost...7,63391,00.html

This is publication in Theregester

http://www.theregister.co.uk/200...ijacking_risks/

Article in Globe and Mail newspaper
http://ctv.globetechnology.com/s.../ctv- technology

Article in ZDnet
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2..._2- 5344831.html

This is article in Washington Times, May 22, 2004
There is information about my case.

http://www.cato.org/cgi-bin/scri...s/05-30- 04.html

Article in Crime research center:

http://www.crime-research.org/ne...07.22.2004/506/

Article in Dallas, TX Newspaper

http://www.crime-research.org/ne...24.12.2004/862/

Child porn law was declared unconstitutional in Hennepin County, Minnesota, USA'
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=11750


Gravatar The best defence is a smashing offence in mybook anyway. I can easily embarass many a low man in high places if people would simply listen to me better yet just listen to some portions of Yankee wiretap taps of the mob.

http://actionlyme.org/ FBI_WIRETA...ETAPE_TAPES.htm

Then read a portion of a blog url i have provided you with about a very famous CT Yankee lady and then start blogging like hell about you know for a fact to be true. Beleive it or not true gossip mayprotect our purported Democracies for us.

My cell # is 506 434 1379 Give me a call you will see that I am not a shy man.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


Gravatar http://davidamos.blogspot.com/20...art-and- me.html


Gravatar Detective Mark Lounsbury is the crime prevention officer with the Norwich Police department correct? I will take him on myself.

The other blogger about this matter recanted his harsh words in support of amalicious legal action but he also seleted my comment. So much for his newfound integrity. EH?

I did notice somebody from the USA with a big moniter checking my Blog not long after I had posted the link. I must sayI found interesting that nobody contacted me or made any comment whatsoever. Need I say big talking Yankees don't impress me anymore than your crooked cops scare me?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. I saved this web page for my records. I may post it in my blogs.


Gravatar I noticed that you left my words posted. For that I must thank you sir.

I am a man of my word and immediately after I noticed someone was paying attention went to my Blog from this website, I gave Det Mark Lounsbury of Norwich Police Department a call and properly introduced myself to his voicemail machine in order to stress test a corrupt cop's ethics and his internet prowess to the max. For the record I found his phone number (860) 886-5561 ext 153) here.

http://www.norwichct.org/ content...ault.aspx#staff

Perhaps many folks should check my work and then give the Yankee cop a call to see if he thinks I am just another crazy Canadain or not. Anyone can call me on my cell at 506 434 1379 after 8pm Atlantic time and I will talk all night. I am not a shy man and very concerned about the Yankee big talk about Iran.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


Gravatar A comment I posted on a story at:
http://www.pbs.org/ teachersource...in_the_jul.html

A brief scan of the news of the day led me to the story of Julie Amero. My initial reaction was "How great a tragedy that someone's life has been turned upside-down by an act not within her control." Moreover, facing the idea of up to 40 years in prison for it -- even if this were a true crime, is this a legitimate punishment?

I thought that before I go out and start my own crusade to "Free Julie Amero," it would be appropriate for me to get a few more facts about the case. A quick Googling and that's just what I got when I read your piece. I'm truly baffled by the lack of knowledge, understanding, and the willingness to accept the truth about the Internet: it PREYS on people like Mrs. Amero -- constantly entering into our personal space (i.e. – our computer hard drives) carrying out tasks without showing itself, loading unwanted, harmful software and "toolbars" that do nothing but collect more data to use for commercial purposes, steal personal information, and slow your computer down to a snail's pace. And for this, we get the first American teacher to face up to 40 years in prison – yes, prison -- for something where from the facts the readers of "Windows for Dummies" could derive "reasonable doubt."

This country needs to do something about the high-jacking of John and Jane Doe's privacy. Companies and individuals alike are force-feeding us more junk mail, circulars, pop-up ads and unwanted email then EVER. If porn, print advertising, spam and the software programs that generate it all didn't pump BILLIONS of the Almighty Dollar into the economy, we'd all be standing at the steps of Capitol Hill demanding that our elected officials -- who supposedly represent our best interests -- put an end to it all. No, REALLY, put an end to it all!

And lo, the proponents stand behind the cloaks of “free enterprise” and my personal favorite, "free speech." Ah, the good ‘ol Constitution....

But what if no one wants to hear it?

Julie Amero is a sacrificial lamb to the Gods of Ignorance and Enterprise, while the greater good of the Internet continues to bear a world-wide-bad-rapp.

And Johnny Cochran is furiously tossing in his grave.


Gravatar Ament Christopher (except for the Johnny Cochrane part)If you wish to become truly furious checkout ICANN and look into the rights we never had on the internet. Most of the web is run by spin doctors of one sort or another with the same agenda. beleive about only 10 percent or so of what you read but read all that intereests you so that you can sort the truths from fiction out for yourself
Best Regards
Dave


Gravatar P.S despite my obvious incompetent spelling the truly funny part of this blog is when the page refreshes up comes the following words
"this is the end of the internet"
I love it. I just had to write something else to see it again. My hat is off who did that, because if we can't find some fun in this madness we truly would go crazy Eh?
Veritas Vincit
David Ramond Amos


Gravatar GUILTY by plea. No trial. No dream team of geeks. Read the truth at.......

http://julie-amero-alex-eckelber...y.blogspot.com/

"It ain't over till the fat lady sings."

Hi Alex.


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ? 

 

Commenting by HaloScan