Seen the Kaspersky response? This bit is extremely interesting:

"In its TRO motion, Zango asks for mandatory relief--i.e., that Kaspersky USA remove
Zango from its list of suspicious websites and otherwise modify the anti-virus and other
security software. The problem, however, is that Kaspersky USA has no ability to do so. The
security software is designed, developed, and maintained by a Russian company, Kaspersky
Lab ZAO ( Kaspersky Moscow ). Kaspersky USA is merely a non-exclusive distributor of
Kaspersky Moscow s products, is not an agent or subsidiary, and has no control over or
ability to modify the software. Zango has sued the wrong company."
Paperghost | Homepage | 06.05.07 - 5:23 pm | #

...doh, link vanished.

http://spamnotes.com/2007/06/05/...ngo- update.aspx
Paperghost | Homepage | 06.05.07 - 5:24 pm | #

The boys at 180 are claiming victory to some degree:
http://blog.180solutions.com/ Per...fb21482405.aspx
TeMerc | Homepage | 06.05.07 - 11:22 pm | #

ROFL

Victory - on a motion that was DENIED them. Gotta love the PR spin.

And their "feedback" link leads you to a formal announcement of how Zango came about, rather than provide an opportunity to give feedback. I wonder why... :P
Obi Wan | 06.06.07 - 11:18 am | #