So, allowing 7th graders to be bombarded with porn popups is nearly half as bad (40 yrs vs 90 yrs) as raping a 14-year old girl and killing a family of 4?

Of course she hasn't been convicted and sentenced yet, so maybe somebody with a clue will sort things out. Otherwise she might as well kill the judge; what's another 5 to 10 on top of 40 if you can get some satisfaction out of it? I mean if I'm going to spend 40 years in jail, I might as well do something horrible enough to be worth spending 40 years in jail for. I wonder how many porn popups a murder is worth...

But seriously, if this woman spends one night in jail something is seriously wrong with our society. I would not be against some sort of fine since the computer wasn't turned off. However, the fine should go against the school (not the teacher) since she was following their directions.
Anonymous | 02.28.07 - 2:34 pm | #

I've been reading a lot about this case lately, and the conviction stems from the fact that the jurors think she deliberately viewed the sites and did nothing to prevent the kids from seeing them. For the sake of argument, let's assume that she is a porn-crazed maniac and deliberately viewed explict hardcore pornography at school in front of the kids. Hell, let's go nuts and say she physically secured them to their seats, taped their eyelids open, and forced them to watch 8 hours of the most explict hardcore adult content you could imagine. Even THAT would not be worth 40 years. She could have KILLED one of the kids and gotten less than 40 years. This whole case is a complete joke.
Anonymous | 03.01.07 - 12:25 pm | #