|
|
|
Haven't they got like, 25 million customers? I wonder how many bank online.
.....ouch?
Paperghost |
Homepage |
08.30.07 - 3:14 pm | #
|
|
Any ideas on what malware is being served?
kitty500cat |
08.30.07 - 4:16 pm | #
|
|
Identified so far:
Email-Worm.Win32.Agent.l
Rootkit.Win32.Agent.dw
Rootkit.Win32.Agent.ey
Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.cnh
Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Small.ddy
Trojan-Proxy.Win32.Agent.nu
Trojan-Proxy.Win32.Wopla.ag
Trojan.Win32.Agent.awz
And a bunch of others that I have yet to identify
TNT |
08.30.07 - 4:22 pm | #
|
|
Best part is, the malware hasn't been removed.
Eik Corell |
08.30.07 - 5:00 pm | #
|
|
I'm sitting on the site right now, 11:30 PM MST.....nuttin going on, some code still there tho, viewable in 'Source Code' info....
Nothing in TCPView either, no outbound connections out of the ordinary
Must have fixed it.
TeMerc |
Homepage |
08.31.07 - 2:36 am | #
|
|
I didn't see any iframes, but are any of the Adobe Flash files malicious?
kitty500cat |
08.31.07 - 8:24 am | #
|
|
Kitty500cat, it's all good now.
alex eckelberry |
08.31.07 - 9:41 am | #
|
|
Thanks for all the research and updates on this, Alex .. it helped a *lot!*
lonewolf |
08.31.07 - 12:21 pm | #
|
|
Thanks For the updates
utsav |
09.01.07 - 12:08 am | #
|
|
Thank you for notifing us as users, but did you notified the BAnk of India's online Department ?? regarding the facts ??
Choto Cheeta |
Homepage |
09.01.07 - 2:21 am | #
|
|
Choto Cheeta -- we tried vainly to reach them. However, there were others who were successful and it's all clean now.
Alex Eckelberry |
09.01.07 - 9:38 am | #
|
|
I wouldn't call it "all clean". They're still under maintenance and have few working links on their home page.
Well o.k. They're clean, but not up and running.
This message is posted on the BoI website: "This site is under temporary maintenance till further notice. Kindly bear with us."
I also noticed that it's "best viewed with IE 4.01 at 800x600. Who the hell is still using that crummy browser?
Anonymous |
09.01.07 - 4:07 pm | #
|
|
>>> I also noticed that it's "best viewed with IE 4.01 at 800x600. Who the hell is still using that crummy browser?
Their crappy developers who might be still programming in Windows 98, and ASP or some other crap.
Surendra Singhi |
Homepage |
09.03.07 - 1:59 am | #
|
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|