|
|
|
12 of you voted early, (or was it only a few voting often?)
telcontar |
11.07.06 - 12:13 am | #
|
|
I have to admit, I didn't vote yet, but I am voting only pro-life. No compromises, which means I have several write-in candidates. One of them is for Governor of NY. That's right, if anyone wants to know, Faso, the Republican candidate is NOT pro-life.
Kim |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 9:28 am | #
|
|
Here's my take.
http://theworldimho.blogspot.com...s-
election.html
Christine |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 1:16 pm | #
|
|
If you're in Maryland, write me in for governor. I am an official write-in candidate and I am 100% pro-life, pro-family.
John J. Simmins |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 2:13 pm | #
|
|
That's fine, John, but Bob Ehrlich needs every vote he can get, as well as Michael Steele.
Janice |
11.07.06 - 3:43 pm | #
|
|
I voted for the pro-life candidates who didn't have D's next to their names.
Unfortunately, the Michigan Right to Life continues to endorse Democratic candidates, despite that these "pro-life" candidates continue to support prominent pro-abortion Democrats such as Jennifer Granholm.
Boethius |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 3:54 pm | #
|
|
I voted for Jesus, because I support his feed the poor fish for free, willingness to provide personally provide free healthcare, and his anti-rich people getting into heaven.
I bet this result gets censored like a google result in the PRC.
Hoodlum |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 4:50 pm | #
|
|
Hoodlum, I think you're mistaken in your views. Scripture says: Amor pecunia radix malorum
est NOT pecunia radix malorum est. Money actually can go a great deal of good: feed the poor, clothe the naked. Hoodlum did you ever get a JOB from a poor person? If you don't understand the distinction between the love of money and the mere possession of money then you've got a serious problem. By the way, have you read "Mit Brennender Sorge" or "Non Abbiamo Bisogno", Encyclicals by Pius XI? They were encyclicals which condemned Nazism and Fascism as incompatible with Catholicism. If Pius XI were writing one today, I'm fairly certain he would condemn the Abortion Party aka the Democrat Party as incompatible with Catholicism. Tom
tjm |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 6:07 pm | #
|
|
feed the poor fish for free...
willingness to provide personally provide...
his anti-rich people getting into heaven.
Two grammatical mistakes. And one totally incorrect statement (unless I missed something). Hee.
Nutcrazical
a teenager |
11.07.06 - 6:19 pm | #
|
|
Oh, wait. Maybe Hoodlum meant that anti-rich people get into Heaven according to Jesus. Yet another thing I missed!
Nutcrazical |
11.07.06 - 6:21 pm | #
|
|
Well, Thomas, when I took this poll this morning, I said I would vote nothing but pro-life. That's what I did. It took a little longer because I had to write in most of my candidates, but it is well worth it, despite the fact that my candidates are guaranteed to lose.
Kim |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 10:42 pm | #
|
|
I voted for Jesus, because I support his feed the poor fish for free,
I didn't know Jesus had so much in common with the Mafia.
Kim |
Homepage |
11.07.06 - 10:49 pm | #
|
|
tjm, I didn't make fun of the rich people, your sky daddy, jesus, did. You know, the whole camel and the needle bit?
Hoodlum |
Homepage |
11.08.06 - 2:03 am | #
|
|
Hoodlum,
Thats cool, but you should read the rest of the story before you come here and try to act like a winner. Seriously though, I'm sure you're cool. And you probably have like 50 hot girlfriends and stuff.
Bryan |
11.08.06 - 2:40 am | #
|
|
I tried voting for all pro-life candidates, but sometimes there were only two and they both stunk. So, I chose the one that stunk least.
Apherius |
11.08.06 - 3:13 am | #
|
|
Like Apherius, in some races I didn't have a clear pro-life choice. Or at least not one that had a shot at winning.
JohnS |
Homepage |
11.14.06 - 3:27 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|