|
|
|
Someone remind me, please. Did Hilary Clinton ALSO vote to keep ramming scissors into baby skulls safe & legal, or was it just Obama?
Ed Peters |
Homepage |
02.04.08 - 10:43 am | #
|
|
Ed Peters, but "Catholics" who vote for the Democratic Party presidential candidates are absolved because they are for the highest moral principle of all - the Minimum Wage! Tom
TJM |
02.04.08 - 12:50 pm | #
|
|
Hillary's husband vetoed the ban on infanticide. She is every bit as pro-abortion as Obama, if not more so becaue she is a radical feminist.
She is more dangerous than Obama, I think, because she is so experienced in her conniving and willing to do ANYTHING to attain her goal. Obama is still going through the learning curve in comparison.
LvB |
02.04.08 - 5:23 pm | #
|
|
Sadly, the Democrat Party has essentially sold its soul to abortionists.
I know that there are many aspects of Democrat policy that are appealing on humanitarian grounds, but they get the most important one wrong.
My philosophy on this issue -- which I've posted here before -- is that government's most important function is the protection of innocent human life. If a candidate can't get that one right, I'm not really too interested in his or her position on world trade, or the environment, or international relations.
brassband |
02.04.08 - 6:07 pm | #
|
|
brassband, right. If they favor baby-killing, what point does Social Security reform really have?
Ed Peters |
Homepage |
02.04.08 - 10:31 pm | #
|
|
Hey, who's putting links in my posts?
Anyway, and endorsemtn from NARAL, man, talk about the Kiss of Death.
Ed Peters |
Homepage |
02.09.08 - 2:09 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|