This act is offensive to Catholicism AND law.

WAC
(J.D., CUA, '04)
Will Cubbedge | Homepage | 09.27.07 - 4:22 pm | #

First you have to go back to the idea that they have student groups called "Law Students for Choice" allowed on campus...you've already lost the battle when you lay down your arms, Georgetown.
Lori | 09.27.07 - 4:26 pm | #

Georgetown is the apostasy to BC's heresy. This story isn't the least bit surprising.
Thomas | 09.27.07 - 4:54 pm | #

I dont know what's the deal with the law school and their statutes etc. I know here at the undergraduate main campus the pro-choice group is not recognized or funded and is not allowed to use universit facilities. I dont know how it is allowed at the law school.
Anthony | 09.27.07 - 6:33 pm | #

Ah, well, you see . . . we lawyers are much more "enlightened," and therefore more willing to tolerate (celebrate?) groups that advance infanticide . . .
brassband | 09.28.07 - 6:14 am | #

brassband, that's silly. GU Law has turned out scads of fine, pro-life, Catholic lawyers over the decades. the problem is not lawyers, the problem is ideologues who get in to law (and most every other profession). they corrupt a noble profession.

GU Law recently canonized Drinan, of all people. that's all one needs to know about who runs GU Law today.

these kinds of problems never go away on their own. GU Law must be confronted. and I think, this time, they will be. support for advocacy of abortion is a naked act of agression against the innocent.
Edward Peters | Homepage | 09.28.07 - 7:58 am | #