|
|
|
Margaret Sanger must be very pleased. She was, after all, a racist eugenicist.
Ed Peters |
Homepage |
02.29.08 - 12:46 pm | #
|
|
Excellent point re: M. Sanger.
The whole purpose behind Sanger's movement was not "individual rights of privacy" as later formulate in litigation; it was an effort to improve the human race by preventing the "lower types" from breeding.
brassband |
02.29.08 - 1:59 pm | #
|
|
Even knowing how twisted Planned Parenthood is, listening to that video was surreal, almost unbelievable. I pray that my state's (Virginia) attempt to cut off funding survives. I don't want my money going to support people like that, let alone everything else they do.
Cole M. |
02.29.08 - 9:56 pm | #
|
|
As I've posted elsewhere, Why does Obama work with these people?
Dean Steinlage |
Homepage |
02.29.08 - 10:50 pm | #
|
|
Will Obama, Clinton and all Democrats, who so strongly support Planned Parenthood, come out against them now?????
Kathy |
03.01.08 - 7:21 am | #
|
|
Kathy: not a chance.
Mike Petrik |
03.01.08 - 9:56 am | #
|
|
The first thing that will happen is that they will be "outraged" at the "deception" that was practiced. Kind of like some years ago when Meredith Viera went into a pro-life clinic, pretending to be pregnant, and pretending to want an abortion, and then accusing the clinic of "deception" in their marketing. Amazing, isn't it?
Paul Sadek |
03.01.08 - 11:40 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|