|
|
|
Wow, that is odd.
Jeff Miller |
Homepage |
02.12.08 - 11:09 pm | #
|
|
hmmm, they have established that Dr. Paul is not related to the city, but have they established that he is not related to the apostle?
Tim Ferguson |
02.13.08 - 9:40 am | #
|
|
I saw this news story yesterday, and I got a good laugh out of that line as well! I understand what the writer was trying to do -- i.e., clear up any possible confusion over two "Paul" references (one being Ron Paul, the other being the city of St. Paul, MN). But the way it is written makes it sound like the clarification is needed so that we don't think that St. Paul, Minnesota is named after Ron Paul. I like Ron Paul, and I voted for him, but I'm pretty sure that the city is named after a slightly more famous Paul. :)
-Paul H
(no relation to St. Paul or Ron Paul, by the way)
Paul H |
02.13.08 - 10:43 am | #
|
|
Maybe they'll check on links to Ru Paul next?
Chris Molter |
02.15.08 - 11:11 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|