AmericanPapist Comments
If we act natural, they won't notice we're out of uniform.
PSST! Chelsea, did you see one of those statues move?!!! I'm out of here!
Please forgive me fellow Catholic combox warriors, but I have to say - in spite of myself - Miss Chelsea is looking rather lovely.
Now any Catholic bachelors willing to do some mercy dating and see if we can't get a marriage conversion out of the deal? In the end, you have to admit, having Bill as a father in law would be worth it - he would be fun at holidays and probably knows some really good dirty jokes. (sigh)
Yes, ASimpleSinner, time has been good to her. But Hillary for a mother-in-law? Just how much penance does a fella have to do?
Maybe if you were a Moravian duke or the like, and could live in some remote spot on the other side of the world with poor access to airports and international telephone calls. Then it wouldn't be bad at all, I reckon.
See I am willing to be that so long as you did not talk religion or politics, the Clintons would be amiable inlaws.
If one were to sit down for a game of Euchre with the inlaws, make sure Bill is on your team...
I'm guessing she isn't going anywhere these days unless there is a political angle for Hillary, so why is she there?
Of the many places I expected comments to go, discussing Chelsea as a desirable spouse is about the very least likely. :)
Good point, Thomas. Especially since this picture makes it look like she's discerning a call to join the convent. Single gents better act fast.
Alternately (and cautiously!):
Well, the Obamas' church preached Black Liberation Theology...
Nun: "Hail Mary, full of grace, can Chelsea go some other place?"
t2irsh - we want her right there... To convert her, because that is what we Catholics do - we convert! mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Nun why i cant be a statue like the one behind me Is beyond me.
Nun: "Is that sulfur I smell?"
What's a pro-homosexual marriage, pro-abortion advocate doing at a Catholic-run nursing home? BTW,today's local papers in Puerto Rico, where the picture was taken, are spreading the rumor that the Archbishop of San Juan (Puerto Rico) will be the next Cardinal of New York.
I wonder who feels like she is doing more penance, if Chelsea or the Sister next to her? *sigh*
Wait a second . . . is that the Shrine crypt?
Was Chelsea Clinton at the Shrine???
When?
wac
Nah, that's not the Shrine. Just looks like one of the statues in the Hall of American Saints.
wac
Is it me or does the nun look a lot like the statue behind her (of the woman with her hands folded in prayer)?
"BTW,today's local papers in Puerto Rico, where the picture was taken, are spreading the rumor that the Archbishop of San Juan (Puerto Rico) will be the next Cardinal of New York."
Interesting thought, and plausible, too. Archbishop Gonzalez was an auxiliary to Cardinal Law, and before that a priest of the Archdiocese of New York.
The One of the right is clearly the Mother Superior...
Tour guide... "and on your left Ms. Clinton you'll see an example of the earliest kown Religious Right. Rumor has it they still persist. Evidently Ted Kennedy traces himself to this movement. I will add that it's confusing for anyone, Mr. Kennedy included to see how they are connected."
What am I doing here???
What am I doing here???
After this it's ladies night over at the cabana!
You people call yourselves Christians, pretty strange. Jesus did not reject sinners; he called them to conversion. We should welcome all people to our churches, universities, etc. Besides, what has Chelsea done wrong? Supporting the political positions of the parents who raised her? On certain issues, she just doesn't know any better I guess.
Michael,
There is nothing wrong or unchristian about wondering why a woman, who is responsible for the moral implications
of supporting someone as rabidly pro-abort as HRC, is spending time with
nuns. I don't ask forgiveness from you for thinking it's not a good idea for nuns to hang with supportive daughter of a woman who could be responsible for the death of millions of babies.
Jesus ate with sinners, but not while they were supporting those who advocate the slaughter of innocents.
Moth-eaten overcoat,
You are wrong, Jesus did eat with sinners while they were sinning. He ate with tax-collectors and prostitutes. He would have eaten with the Clintons, and he would have loved them. We shouldn't be afraid to do the same.
Jesus called sinners to repentance when he ate with them, and always said that if you love him you will follow his commandments.
Commenting by HaloScan
