AmericanPapist Comments
Oh well, since he had no problem giving Communion to pro-abort Nanci Pelosi, why would he worry about gay men dressed up as nuns?
Once you stop worrying about the souls of those receiving Communion this is no surprise.
How can this action not qualify as an objectively sacrilegious administration and reception of the Eucharist, that is, as a “sacrilegium reale”? Consider, e.g., Palazzini, “Sacrilegium” DMC IV: 171-176, at 174; and Naz, “Sacrilege”, DDC VII: 830-834, at 832. Perhaps while I am away attending to some pressing previous commitments someone can enlighten me.
In the meantime, let Canon 897 set the tone for this discussion: “The most August sacrament is the Most Holy Eucharist in which Christ the Lord himself is contained, offered, and received and by which the Church continually lives and grows. The eucharistic sacrifice, the memorial of the death and resurrection of the Lord, in which the sacrifice of the cross is perpetuated through the ages is the summit and source of all worship and Christian life, which signifies and effects the unity of the People of God and brings about the building up of the body of Christ. Indeed, the other sacraments and all the ecclesiastical works of the apostolate are closely connected with the Most Holy Eucharist and ordered to it.”
*emended*
Listen, O fellow Michigander - I'm not saying it's not apropos, I'm just saying you might not have meant to say it that way...
*yikes.*
gooooooood call. :)
What does it really matter if these individuals want to receive communion? Christ's message is love. It always has been. I'm talking before the Bible was altered by men. Why don't we just love these people for who they are? God doesn't judge. WE do. God is love, God is perfect. God knows no hate or misjudgment. Humans judge. Let these people take Communion if they want to. Does it matter how I'm dressed if I want to receive the Eucharist? No. I could go up there in a t-shirt and receive the Eucharist. This is why I don't follow the Catholic faith anymore. They judge too much and that is not what God's message is about.
If the Bible was altered by men, how do we know Christ's message is love? For that matter, how do we know He even existed in the first place as opposed to being some Jungian symbol?
When one writes themselves out of the play, it's absurd to pester the remaining actors for how they play their part.
How convenient it must be to believe that men altered the Bible! You can believe anything you want and try to convince yourself that it comes from God!
Commenting by HaloScan
