AmericanPapist Comments
My instinct tells me that the correct answer to your question is "Yes, Sen. Obama will get away with it."
Why?
Because the majority of the media are deeply in love with him and cannot bring themselves to report his faults and failures.
On the other hand . . . if the media concluded that Sen. Obama was making strategic error after strategic error (as I believe that he is), there is the slimmest of chances that they might turn on him as others of their species are wont to do when they smell blood . . . but don't bet on it.
A serious question:
Is there a webpage that simply, and clearly, lays out this case?
I frequently raise this issue with Obama supporters, and their response is almost always the same, "I would never support a pro-infanticide candidate, but Obama would never take a position like that. If you could show me proof on this issue I would not support him."
LCB,
Here the most clearly written article on the matter that I've come across.
http://
article.nationalreview.co...YjYxNmEwMTdhYWE
We could have expected no less from the man who, when asked to define the point at which life begins, said that the question was above his pay grade.
Obama's advantage has been his facade of youth, elegance and charisma. To voters, he's a blank canvas on which the hopeful can paint their dreams. But Obama's Pro-Death voting record is one which he cannot deny, no matter how he tries.
Finally, the mask is slipping.
He's an empty suit. If the media loves you, by definition, you should never be president. Tom
Even if the media all like the guy, the medium that likes him least is FoxNews, or at least they certainly employ some people who don't like him.
Perhaps if enough people go to FoxNews.com and submit this thing as a news story, and email the conservative talking heads often enough, they may pick up on it... After all, CNN played interference for him with that interview.
The sad truth most "pro-choicers" consistently duck is that they don't want to 'liberate' women from being pregnant. What they want is a dead baby with no strings attached either legally or emotionally.
After all, if the baby survives an abortion and is expelled (born) then it's no longer "the woman's body", no longer "a threat to her health" - unless her health requires a dead baby to be 'healed'. Alas, that's what their convenience/whim requires: a dead baby at all cost.
So yes, he is in favor of infanticide. He has zero moral authority to be outraged by war, capital punishment or any other case where adults are treated with less barbarity than he's blithely willing to deal out to completely innocent, completely defenseless human babies.
Commenting by HaloScan
