AmericanPapist Comments
This can't be right. Although I'd welcome any of these comments over Hillary, no poll has ever shown this consistent of a result. Not to mention that the Giuliani and Romney polls are statistically insignificant. Maybe something different about their methodology?
Zogby is big stuff, you know.
From my reading, the poll numbers have changed in the last few weeks. Zogby isn't an anomoly.
While I agree that I'd rather see Hillary behind in these polls, I wouldn't give them too much significance.
It's kind of like coming from behind and taking a 2-1 lead in the bottom of the first inning of the first game of a best-of-seven series. I'd rather be ahead than behind, but there's a lot of baseball left to play . . .
right brassband. iow, polls can be entirely accurate in measuring a phenomenon that itself is constantly changing, ie, public opinion.
What people tend to forget is that Hillary's negative ratings are astronomically high, despite constant MSM pumping of her profile, and that the Zogby poll probably asked questions in a way that allowed the visceral force of those feelings to be registered.
Commenting by HaloScan
