|
|
|
done
Scott W. |
Homepage |
10.06.08 - 4:46 pm | #
|
|
FSMDude is named Dominique Poulin. They've identified the guy and the parishes where he's going to get communion (though someone's also spotted a bag of hosts in a video, suggesting that he ordered a box from a church supply store for some of the videos).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9...h?
v=9rNzM2HsUjk
Canadian Papists (Quebecer Papists, specifically) should keep their eyes peeled.
WhollyRoamin'Catholic |
Homepage |
10.07.08 - 12:50 am | #
|
|
and done.
Mary in CO |
10.07.08 - 6:17 pm | #
|
|
Bill Donohue posted a video response here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f...h?
v=fLP2fHGHX7c
entitled
Bill Donohue Addresses Eucharist Desecration (YouTube).
I think a widespread boycott is valid, because we don't need YouTube. It is nice to use the site, but we don't really need them. If they felt the loss of some ad revenue from less visitors to the site, less patronage by Catholic blogs and news-sites, etc, it would make a statement. And we wouldn't be enabling YouTube to show such utter disrespect for us.
John14v15 |
Homepage |
10.07.08 - 8:46 pm | #
|
|
Then there is the matter of defending the Eucharist itself. I can't go there. I am too outraged.
John14v15 |
Homepage |
10.07.08 - 8:47 pm | #
|
|
FWIW, my thoughts.
I think that public anger and outrage may be of limited benefit here. Protest, yes, but I think there's a benefit to keeping it low key.
SDG |
Homepage |
10.07.08 - 11:16 pm | #
|
|
Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity.
No, we need to boycott. We could continue to post apologetic and catechetical videos; but we don't need to view, and we don't need to download. Even should our boycott be numerically ineffective, we have respect for ourselves, and for Jesus.
John14v15 |
Homepage |
10.08.08 - 9:08 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|