|
|
|
I, too, cannot imagine why it would be so important to remove the cross.
It also does not sit well with me that the cross is "allowed" stand only because a federal judge has decided that it communicates "primarily non-religious messages." I wonder if that is the position the Thomas More Center argued in district court. I'm not sure it is worth winning the fight on those terms.
crazylikeknoxes |
08.01.08 - 2:03 pm | #
|
|
I'm just happy it gets to stay.
GW |
08.04.08 - 2:58 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|