"Israel continues to refuse to tell international sappers where it dropped its illegal cluster bombs on Lebanon."
I recently read a comment from a UN official who offered an explanation for Israel's bombardment of Lebanon with cluster bombs. He suggested that this ordinance, which dated from 1972, was too old to be reliable, and its use against Lebanon provided a cheap way to dispose of it.
After reading 60+ posts, very few have to do with Mr. Melman's opinion, rather, they are thinly veiled attacks at "Israeli's", Jew's in general. It must be hard to conceal your burning, anonymous hatred that continues to feed from your disappointments in life (passed over for a promotion--boss or business owner is Jewish, didn't get accepted to the University of your choice-too many smart Jews, got laid off--because the economic downturn was caused by the secret band of wealthy Jews that control all!...etc) Hate does seem to help you maintain focus, keep things straight, explain the unexplainable. Stick with it. Why? Because, it only solidifies our identity which bleeds towards a complacent death everyday in America's openness and acceptance. Thank you 
- comment by commenter 'Ben' about the entry 'Report Could Derail Mideast Peace Process' in Yossi Melman at PostGlobal on January 30, 2008 6:08 PM
http://
newsweek.washingtonpost.c...l_comments.html
Maybe Ben should look at his own burning anonymous hatred to see where it leads to: jews attacking christians, moslems, pagans, atheists, and ... historians. Nothing new to see, move along.
---
Spanish Jewish leader urges jail terms for Holocaust denial
MADRID (AFP)---The leader of Spain's Federation of Jewish Communities on Monday urged lawmakers to make denial of the Holocaust once again punishable by imprisonment.
Spanish law had mandated a sentence of up to two years in prison for Holocaust denial but in November Spain's Constitutional Court ruled it falls within freedom of speech and would no longer be punishable with jail.
The court however ruled that imprisonment is a constitutional punishment for any individual convicted of justifying the Holocaust or any other genocide.
In an address to parliament, the federation leader Jacobo Israel Garzon asked
lawmakers to "think about how to once again introduce prison terms for Holocaust denial in the penal code".
Holocaust denial is "the threshold of hate speech" and its "depenalisation"
could lead to the rise in the distribution of Nazi propoganda, he added.
Holocaust denial is specifically targeted by laws in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland and Romania.
In April 2007 the European Union made inciting racism and xenophobia crimes throughout its 27 member states in a landmark decision tempered by caveats to appease free speech concerns.
http://www.ejpress.org/article/23776
Meanwhile, in other stories, too much holocaust affirmation yields complaints.
Holocaust carnival float shocks in Brazil
RIO DE JANEIRO (AFP)---Jewish groups in Brazil have expressed disgust over a controversial float to appear in Brazil's upcoming carnival parade that depicts dead victims of the Nazi Holocaust.
(...)
http://www.ejpress.org/article/23789
that Ben item is a classic of universal pre emptive ad hominem argumentation. it is the jewish equivalent of, "before you say anything, let me remind you that all men are born in sin and the truth is not in them."
aha, I have found a HEBREW TRAINER with TWENTY AUDIO-CD's on amazon! let's see them blackball me from there!
Rowan's little pals get a new birthday.
This year, on 31 October, Jews in the UK celebrate 350 years since their re-admittance to the British Isles.
http://www.ejpress.org/digest/in...on_anglo_jewry/
aint they sweeet...
I underatand that Edward Longshanks' edict of 1290 AD evicting the jews from england is still on the statute books, or is this just another urban legend?
it is? (twiddles peyot apprehensively)
Oddly enough the very recent link from whatreallyhappened.com to this article "has expired".
Egypt and Iran hold first high-level meeting in decades
http://www.africasia.com/
service...56.ffrtrexl.php
Posted Jan 30, 2008 09:55 AM PST
Category: IRAN
wrh.com sez:
First, high level meetings between Iranian and Egyptian dignitaries, and very soon, a meeting with Amedinejad himself, at the invitation of the Iraqi government in Baghdad.
Could it be that the world is looking at the beginning of a united Arab geopolitical perspective, with Iran at its center?
Oh, and by the way; that dull, collective thumping sound you hear is is the sound of US foreign policy makers banging their collective heads against the wall.
This may well be the real legacy of the US's invasion and occupation of Iraq, and the irony cannot be lost on those who have been following these events closely.
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 1,810 for edward longshanks jews. (0.22 seconds)
Edward I of England - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 1290, by the Edict of Expulsion, Edward formally expelled all Jews from England. ..... ALTERNATIVE NAMES, Longshanks, Hammer of the Scots ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_I_of_England - 151k - Cached - Similar pages
Book of Phrases ENGLISH GERMAN FRENCH
Yes Ja Oui
No Nein Non
Do you speak (English, German, French, Italian, Japanese, Russian)?
Sprechen sie (Englisch,Deutsch,Französisch, Italienisch,Japanisch,Russisch)?
Parlez-vous (anglais, allemand, francais, italien, japonais,russe)?
Where are you from? Wo kommen sie her? D'ou venez-vous?
Where are you going? Wo gehen sie hin? Ou allez-vous?
What is your name? Wie heißen sie? Quel est votre nom?
What is your unit? Zu welcher Einheit gehören sie? Quelle est votre unite?
Show me your identification papers.
Zeigen sie mir ihre Papiere.
Montrez moi vos papiers d'identite.
Show me your orders. Zeigen sie mir ihre Befehle. Montrez moi vos ordres.
We want information. Wir wollen Informationen. Nous voulons des renseignements.
Where is the book/artifact? Wo ist das Buch/Artefakt? Ou est le livre/l'objet?
Have you seen the Yellow Sign? Haben sie das gelbe Zeichen. Avez-vous vu le Signe Jaune?
That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die.
Es ist nicht tot was ewig liegt, bis das der Tod die Zeit besiegt.
N'est pas mort ce qui a jamais dort, et il est d'etranges eons ou meme la mort peut mourir.
In his house at R'lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming.
In seinem Haus in R’lyeh liegt der tote Cthulhu schlafend.
Dans sa demeure de R'lyeh la morte, Cthulhu reve et attend.
You must come with me. Sie müssen mit mir kommen. Vous devez me suivre.
Step away from the altar/book/artifact.
Treten sie zurück von dem Altar/Buch/Artifakt.
Restez a l'ecart de l'autel/du livre/de l'art/de l'objet.
Give me the book/artifact/gun/knife.
Geben sie mir das Buch/das Artefakt/die Waffe/das Messer.
Donnez-moi le livre/l'objet/le pistolet/le couteau.
What is that? Was ist das? Qu'est-ce que c'est?
Stop! Police! Halt! Polizei! Arretez! Police!
Stop or I will shoot! Halt oder ich schieße! Arretez ou je tire!
Help me! Helfen sie mir! Hilfe! Aidez-moi!
Drop it! Fallenlassen! Lachez ca!
Put your hands up! Hände hoch! Mains en l'air!
Surrender or die!
Ergib dich oder stirb! Ergebens sie sich oder sterben sie!
Rendez-vous ou mourrez!
I/We surrender. Ich ergebe mich/wir ergeben uns. Je me rend/Nous nous rendons.
Don't shoot! Nicht schießen! Ne tirez pas!
Are you going to kill me/us? Werden sie mich/uns töten? Allez-vous me/nous tuer?
Shut up! Halt’s Maul! La ferme!
Stop/Keep chanting or I will kill you!
Hören sie (nicht) auf zu singen, oder ich werde sie töten!
Arretez/continuez de chanter ou je vous tue!
Kill him/her/them all. Töte ihn/sie/sie alle. Tuez le/la/les tous.
Die! Die! Why won't it die?!
Stirb! Stirb! Warum stirbt es nicht?
Crźve! Crźve! Pourquoi il ne veut pas crever?
Run! Run for your lives! Rennt! Rennt um euer Leben! Courez! Courez pour sauver vos vies!
My God, what have I done? Mein Gott, was habe ich getan? Mon dieu, qu'ai je fait?
Medic! Sanitäter! Un medecin!
Incoming!
The day of the Florida primary, Hillary won the endorsement of the black Los Angeles congresswoman Maxine Waters!
The non-verbal aspects of President George W. Bush's final State of the Union address were remarkable. He offered numerous winks and nods, with knowing smiles, to the audience at various times and in various directions, presumably but not necessarily directed to particular individuals in the audience. It was not possible from television viewing to tell who may have been the intended individual recipients, or even whether the winks and nods were directed toward anyone in particular. It probably matters little whether the President's gestures were aimed at individuals or simply to everyone in general. The substance of his non-verbal gestures was in either case deeply troubling...
My belated thanks to all are in the last batch of comments
Re 2.
"I’ve noticed that the slurring is fading recently, perhaps under the sickening realization that the slurrers are aiding and abetting – and thus taking moral responsibility for – the kind of thing that the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians in Gaza. It was all fun and games to play the moral superior until the genocide became too obvious. Note the comment thread at Reddit. Don’t think for an instant that you can assist the dirty work of the settler movement and the Jewish Billionaires and not be held morally accountable for it!
The level of slurring in the MSM/public domain has diminished since Leb '06 but it is being employed on an individual case by case basis.
Aside from it being levelled at individuals in www debates, a prime example of its 'private' use is the fact that RB was accused of anti-semitism by the Hebrew tutor's solicitors. Used in this manner it is a gross insult and should be reacted to as such and an apology demanded.
noooooo, in this case it is precisely what i wanted, because it has drawn out the contradiction implicit in the RABBINICAL - RELIGIOUS use of the concepts of "Jew" and hence of "anti-Semite" which are such that for instance an irreligious Jew is also an "anti-Semite" - this is the REAL MEANING OF THE TERM.
The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs. Is implication of dual loyalty not proof of anti-Semitic intent?
I really don't think they split hairs in the use of the term anti-Semitie. It's a broad strokes brush.
This is a very good article about the divisions among the Pals and Lebanese. And from my experience it rings very true.
"When will people in this region learn that those lurking foreign powers are out to further their own agendas? They care not one jot for the well-being of either the Lebanese or the Palestinians. Theirs is a deceptive and deadly dance of power with the soil of Lebanon and Palestine their chosen venues."
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/
...icle_2900.shtml
From the Haaretz article:
In a press release about the postcard, CIDI said the image suggested the Palestinians were persecuted like the Jews during World War II. "Israel and the Palestinians are engaged in a conflict. The Palestinians are not persecuted, there are no extermination camps and there is no genocide," CIDI wrote.
This insulting claptrap begs several questions -
1. How stupid does CIDI think we goyim are?
2. Weren't Germany and the jews engaged in a conflict?
3. When CIDI has to cherry-pick definitions, split hairs and blatantly lie about genocide in order to excuse Israel's treatment of Palestinians, then is it not natural to assume that it's a highly selective and hypocritical Holocaust denial organisation?
It is perfectly reasonable to compare and equate the German and Palestinian Holocausts. Like Europe's Jews, the Palestinians are the innocent victims of racial supremacy-motivated aggression (who could forget "a people without a land for a land without people"). What is not reasonable is for Zionists to deny that their Palestinian Holocaust is worse than the one suffered by Europe's jews. What makes it worse is the fact that the public-consumption message of Holocaust survivors is "Never Again" - a message which is conveniently ignored by God's Chosen People when they're behaving like God's Chosen Assholes in Palestine.
It would be interesting to see CIDI publish its written definition of 'conflict' in the public domain where it could be scrutinized for logic and truthiness.
Rowan Berkeley | Homepage | 01.31.08 - 6:21 am | #
useful phrases for the McCain era
don't worry, boyo, the GOP is throwing the election to Hillary.
I do think
sorry it lost the quote
(Stop) Keep chanting or I will kill you!
should come in handy, whoever wins.
Doesn't have to be thrown, no Republican would have a chance
the GOP is throwing the election to Hillary.
It kinda looks that way. If Ron Paul needs to run as Third Party then he may well pick up the "Anybody But Hillary" vote as well as the "Anybody But McCain/Romney" vote.
Laurie: "I really don't think they split hairs in the use of the term anti-Semitie. It's a broad strokes brush."
Who is meant by "they"? Your mixing of metaphors is hopeless. Play on.
Ron Paul has been described as "Hillary's Worst Nightmare".
Would explain why the GOP + MSM are ignoring him.
Re #3: The Zionists must be taking the long view. The purpose of the war, let's not forget, was to depopulate southern Lebanon as far north as the Litani River, annex the whole area, and resettle it with Jews exclusively; the only reason why that did not happen in 2006 was that Hezbullah defeated them on the ground. The point of saturating the area with cluster bombs is that they make it difficult for the goyim to reoccupy the land. Evidently the ethnic-cleansing-and-annexation project has only been temporarily shelved, not abandoned.
sorta like fluoride described as tooth decay causing germs' worst nightmare, except that the germs own the media.
'splitting hairs.' it's like racism: the entire concept is based on the existence of something called raced. there is no such thing as race.
"Heel spot"
there is no such thing as race.
One may beg to differ. How one responds to the fact there are races (of man) is the important issue. Responses such as "equality of all before the law", or "judging an individual by his character not by his race" are non-racist responses to the fact of races.
You might as well say there is no such thing as gender. The non-sexist responses to gender would be the same as the non-racist responses to races.
He's just trying to pick a fight, righteo. Needs a little attention I suspect.
The purpose of the war, let's not forget, was to depopulate southern Lebanon as far north as the Litani River, annex the whole area, and resettle it with Jews exclusively
-- uh ... huh?
in that case, Hezbollah should dump some clusters of their own ...
things that make ya go hmmmm...
Fallout spread Thursday from a cut in two undersea Internet cables off Egypt's coast, disrupting half of India's bandwidth and causing widespread outages across the Middle East. Israel was unaffected by the outages because its Internet traffic is connected to Europe through a different undersea cable. Lebanon and Iraq were also operating normally, while users in India, Pakistan, Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain were affected. English-language Saudi newspaper Arab News said Saudi Telecom had lost more than 50 percent of its international online connectivity due to the problem...
I wouldn't say that the GOP is giving HRC the win but rather Bush is. All the dirt on McCain will be leaked by the Bush crowd. Just a few days ago he uttered the "gook" word and Asian Americans have noticed. I think RP has to make some serious moves quickly, yes he is HRC's worst nightmare.
in that case, Hezbollah should dump some clusters of their own ...
lobro | 01.31.08 - 10:44 am | #
This article has some interesting reasons for the cluster bombs as part of the imminent war strategy.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ind...ext=va&
aid=7837
And contrary to xymph, says that war with Iran is still part of the plan.
And contrary to all of you here that Israel is the dirty-work arm of the US - EU.. rather than the puppet.
And.. agrees what I've always said, that the Lebanon "skirmish" was to put NATO boots on the ground there. According to this.. in Gaza too. Next.
All still going according to the "plan".
NATO expansion, yes.
'splitting hairs.' it's like racism: the entire concept is based on the existence of something called raced. there is no such thing as race.
spot | 01.31.08 - 10:15 am | #
There was also a time when the professor-priests claimed there was no genetic link to certain illnesses, that all disease could be traced to environmental causes.
Only Whites have been "educated" to believe such a preposterous idea, that their race doesn't exist! Blacks and Browns aren't buying it.
Race does exist and its becoming more IMPORTANT every day (obama vs. clinton)
Its the DNA stupid!
How is Ron Paul a threat to Hillary, really or her "worst nightmare" , whatever? He only says ridiculous psychotic things like we need to abolish the Federal Reserve. So big deal.
" How is Ron Paul a threat to Hillary, really or her "worst nightmare" , whatever? He only says ridiculous psychotic things like we need to abolish the Federal Reserve. So big deal."
What's so ridiculously psychotic about getting rid of the Fed?
Nothing. lol That's the point, if it had any chance of ever getting taken seriously.
watching kingkong on tv, such an obvious piece of gatekeeping, it's like diary of anne frankenstein.
1. an aryan nazi type (carl) represents hollywood's (get it? that baaad hollywood, the nazi den) avarice and insensitivity, he callously sacrifices his kind, suffering jewish cameraman to premordial worms, no respect for wildlife, willing to sacrifice life of loyal jewish friends for showbiz fame, etc.
2. the hero (the guy from 'the pianist') is a soulful jew who understands the suffering of lower life forms like kingkong (plus he shags his blonde sweetheart).
an aside: wouldn't it be nice to have music to warn us every time we're in deep shit?
now he (kk) picks up his shiksa in a ny street and gazes deeply into her eyes, sounds of disney world.
skating on an ice rink, pure art in midst of goy teresienstadt camp.
idyll interrupted by gestapo firing wildly, yelling 'achtung, halt!'
i can't see thru tears.
only an exalted, chosen soul can bond with the primitive man like mlk, i mean, kk.
also, the last glimmer of hope that there is such a thing as goy soul is in blonde shiksas like madonna and britney, the rest of us are recyclable.
ok, the transcendental end, everyone is friends in the nwo, but then, those misunderstanding, big oil yanks shoot kk in the back.
at least the soul-jew is there in the end to service grieving shiksa's needs.
There's a mini-stir today about Bush
asserting he doesn't have to obey legislation forbidding him from establishing permanent bases in Iraq.
The Dems are moaning but will they be decisive for the first time since swept to majority?
Nader's new site for his "2008 Presidential Exploratory Committee"..
Paul/Nader Nader/Paul anyone?
An extract from the Global Research article posted by Juan | 01.31.08 - 1:27 pm
After returning from his trip to Western Europe and conferring with NATO Headquarters the former Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs, Avigdor Lieberman, said on early-July, 2007 that he received the tacit blessing of the E.U., the U.S., and NATO to initiate an Israeli military strike on Iran. “If we start military operations against Iran alone, then Europe and the U.S. will support us,” Avigdor Lieberman told Israeli Army Radio, in a message geared towards Israeli servicemen, following his European tour and his meetings with E.U. officials, José María Aznar of Spain, and the Deputy Secretary-General of NATO.
Avigdor Lieberman also asserted that because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq the U.S., Britain, and their European allies were unable to initiate a war with Iran and its allies, but were willing to allow Israel to attack Iran.
Avigdor Lieberman also affirmed that the U.S. and NATO would intervene on the side of Israel once the war with Iran and its allies were started. The message conveyed to Lieberman by NATO and E.U. officials was that Israel should “prevent the threat herself,” which means that Israel must launch the war against Iran and its regional allies. [15]
Israel will be protected by NATO in a war scenario with Iran and Syria
(snip)
Israel can not challenge Iran militarily. Militarily Tehran is above Israel’s league, despite the illusions of Israeli strength. Tel Aviv will only launch a war against Iran, if the U.S. and NATO are partners in the military operation.
In such a scenario, the U.S., Britain, and NATO will immediately or almost immediately come to the side of Israel, as Avigdor Lieberman has stated.
This is a premeditated arrangement. The leaders of NATO will tell their citizens that Israel was compelled to attack Iran out of fear and because of its “right to exist.” Then they will close ranks with Israel. It should also be stated when a living organism’s “right to exist” comes at the deprivation of the “rights to exist” of everything else around it then it becomes a threat like cancer.
The central thesis of this article, that US/NATO are so thinly spread in the ME that they can't initiate an attack on Iran, but can support an attack launched by Israel, is so counter-intuitive and deeply flawed that it may safely be dismissed as idiotic bullshit.
The initiation phase of an invasion is the most critical. The notion of a phased (ie gradual) initiation, which is what this article is suggesting, flies in the face of common sense and military logic.
Israel, and its chain-dragging allies in such a phased initiation scenario, will be sitting ducks for the counter-attack response to Israel's initiaton. Iran and its allies will be planning their response to ANY attack.
Planning isn't the exclusive preserve of NATO/US/Old Europe. And there is ample evidence that NATO/US/Old Europe's conflict planning is based on factors clouded by ideological misconceptions with a good measure of wishful thinking thrown in for good measure.
I'd like to see Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya's credentials. His only outstanding attribute would appear to be a gift for rushing articles based on unsubstantiated crap to press without examining either the crap or the underlying logic articulated therein.
... and I would make the same accusation about Global Research as an informed and informative entity. It has degenerated into a fear-mongering waste of space.
... a surrogate NYT/WaPo of the www.
"...big oil yanks shoot kk in the back." - and I bet they were all white to.
This is only a personal opinion but my guess is that The West, epitomised by America, is being forced to confront the humiliating fact that its military hardware is grossly over-priced, irrelevant and redundant. Russia has been focusing on missiles as a response to warships and aircraft. I'm not sure when the decision was made but one could argue that the seeds for missile development were sewn when Russia blew Francis Gary Powers' U2 out of the sky with a multi-stage missile.
The US military hardware industry is based on soaking up as much tax-payer's money as possible while producing updated versions of cumbersome WWI hardware - such as ships and tanks.
The ME war-mongering is irrational and seems to be an attempt to pretend, for public consumption, that the West could win a war against a well-armed, committed and well-organised adversary. The unfortunate fact is that the West hasn't had such an adversary since WWII, and is EXTREMELY unlikely to go looking for one when it lacks either the weapons or the tactics to deal with one.
Xymphora,
Nr.1.) "nobody" is searching for logic:
http://churchofnobody.blogspot.c...in-
germany.html
Take the well known German inability to design anything that isn't crap. As my engineering lecturers in university used to drum into us - don't look to the Germans, their design has always been bad to the point of idiotic. And the Holocaust provides perfect proof of this..
http://russophobe.blogspot.com/2...-with-
dave.html
Russophobe fulminates about a new Russian textbook. The textbook's handling of Stalin's treatment of
Zionist "Russians" gives a certain
'Misha' the opportunity to vent
the modern Stalinist line on subjects
related.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g...44&
isPopup=true
(...) Israel was compelled to attack Iran out of fear and because of its “right to exist.”
It is existential, stupid.
Jeff Dahmer killed and ate all those kids because of his right to exist.
Excerpts
"Old Uncle Joe Stalin was a hero of the Soviet Union and of the Russian people. The original Bolshevik revolution was really a Jewish conspiracy. It was revealed very matter-of-factly in many books and articles at the time of the Russian Revolution (which books and articles have since been suppressed in the "free" Western media), that some 85 percent of the Bolshevik leaders were Jewish in origin, and this was in Russia, a country that had at most a 2 percent Jewish population. Was this Jewish domination of the so-called "Russian" revolution a mere coincidence? Hardly.
Hitler, that great hater of the Jews may have been insane, and I quite agree that he was insane; but still the Fuhrer could not have been completely mad, because could still tie his own shoes, and he also apparently still remembered the Jewish origins of the Bolsheviks to his east, in Russia. During WWII the German Air Force distributed millions propaganda fliers over Russia and Ukraine that urged the people to rise up and revolt against their "Bolshevik Jewish Masters."
If the Bolshevik revolution represented the Jewish theft of the Russian state from the Russian people, then the rise of Joseph Stalin represented the theft of that state right back again by the Russians. This is in truth the one "unforgivable crime" for which Joseph Stalin can never be acquitted by the Jews. (If Stalin did anything worse than this, it was nothing worse than something a Bill Clinton might have done.)
The feud between Stalin and the Jews still persists to this day, even though Stalin, the man himself, is long dead. Stalin was apparantly such a significant and traumatic figure to the Jews that today they still feel the need to shadow box with the ghost of the long-dead dictator.
Amongst left-Jews this anti-Stalinism most often takes the form of Trotsky-revisionism. According to this legend Communism itself was not so bad, at least not in the form that the Jews Marx and Trotsky advocated; it was only when the big bad Stalin deposed Trotsky and took over the party that communism suddenly became "bad" and "totalitarian," just in an instant, just like that! Poof!
Nice.
No wonder they think Putin is the second coming of Joe because he retook Russia from the Yids indenture.
Of course they would never say that, it is how he is 'antidemocratic' and persecutes jewrnalists (basically the same crimes Saddam was accused of, "coz' they hate our freedoms").
One has only to examine the hogwash about missile defense from America, and latterly Israel, to suspect that it's a response to the slow-in-coming realization that missiles will be decisive in the next major conflict. We, as citizens, really don't need to know how clever our military planners are, or think they are. And the fact that they're telling us how clever they are is a pretty reliable sign that its the same kind of 'cleverness' that prevents them from winning wars against apparently defenseless countries able to muster a committed guerilla resistance obliging them to engage in mass murder and, ultimately, genocide as the only 'practical' solution to a problem caused by biting off more than one could chew.
The sad fact is that The West doesn't have a military plan beyond consuming expensive weapons in pointless attacks on notionally defenseless targets, and pretending that such attacks are real wars when in fact they are miserable acts of avarice and cowardice.
Rowan Berkeley | Homepage | 01.31.08 - 9:13 am | #
Ha! Hillary herself represents the Dems throwing the election to McCain. Obama too. Edwards was the only electable candidate of the three, therefore he got no money from the JBC. They cannot afford a Democratic White House, it will split the party and a true populist movement might emerge.
Wager you 100 shekels.
Ken Hoop, thanks for the link to Misha's comments. This kind of passion is absent from everyone in the West...except the Israel Firsters.
"Death is preferable to slavery, but the willingness to die for freedom sometimes makes the sacrifice of life unnecessary. This is the only hope we can have."
and this...
"As we at least have that power still in our hands, to save humanity from a fate worse than death. It would be immoral for us NOT to use this power and to simply capitulate without a fight to the satanic global cabal that now confronts us and which now threatens to consume the entire planet and all of humanity."
Its a Mutual Assured Destruction world again....I hope.
Fritz!
Wie wohl haben Sie geschrieben! Ganz gut, und jetzt, wagen wir so etwas zu sagen aus der Nazizeit: Wer kann, voran!
Ich bich ganz zum Ende mit diesen Kerlen die nichts verstehen können. Die Wahrheit liegt ganz offen, und wir brauchen keine gerringe Scheißkerle, so wie der Rowan, uns zu unterrichten. Der hat mir einst beshimpft daß ich nur Wörter vorbringe, möcht'ich ein ganz kleines Wort dazu hinfügen : meine Wörter sind einem Jeden verständlich, ehr und echt, doch Ihre, ja lachen mir mit, sind im Nacht und Nebel verdorbene Dinge ohne Interesse oder Wucht.
Wer ist antändiger Mensch oder Tropf oder Scheißkerl? Schwer zu wissen, doch jeder sieht.
Für Hitler hab' ich keine Liebe, doch nochweniger fur die sogenannte anständige Scheiße die uns ärgern, antragen und quällen. Dennoch, wahre Liebe für die echt anständige Männer die Mut haben dieses Greuel zu wiederstehen.
Was sagte der Luther? "Hier steh' ich. Ich kann nichts anders." Ich stimme mit.
yes indeed, UST & Ken, that guy Misha nails it.
Russophobe is a 100% zionist blog (with mandatory Yulia Tymoshenko on blogroll, Drudge Report and Pajamas Media as recommended web resources as well as every kabbalistic think tank known).
Now, if I said I am a Judeophobe, is that as legit as being a Russophobe?
They even explain why they are Russo- rather than Sovieto- phobes.
Well, my reasons for not bothering with Ziophobia are perfectly analogous.
There will be war.
interesting, too, the poster's by name Dave Essel's response (excerpts):
"Indeed the US is now moving as fast as it can [...] to complete its encirclement and destruction of Russia."
This is the official policy of the USA and you are aware of this? Got a letter from Congress, did you?
"aggressive and belligerent powers now encircle Russia from every side"
Who says they are aggressive and belligerent? Personally I think the problem is that they are way too supine when dealing with Prostitutin's Russia.
Typical of how a Jew debates, twisting and spinning in every direction but straight, throwing in ad-hominem digs embedded in every lying sentence.
To me they just seem insane anymore. No concept of reality, or more likely, they've simply grown up with their own separate reality from the rest of humanity.
sorry for having mixed you up with us tax, Travis, although that is no slight.
as time goes on, it strikes me that the future war of slave creatures of Zion with Russia-China-Iran-Pakistan is an emergent reality, practically off the radar even as of last year but will come to dominate the discussion soon.
no doubt that the central rabbinical committee planned 911 with this in mind though.
The multi-cult nations vs. the racially homogeneous nations.
it was, on the face of it, a good gambit: Russia is weak, grab Iraqi oilfields whose profits will fuel US war machine toward further conquests (Iran, Saudi), leaving China and EU at their mercy and Russia isolated and suing for Pax Judaica.
But they were never on friendly terms with reality, were they?
If things are as they seem now, that would be nice. Depression II on the way, majority of citizens against this war or any other, stormtroopers stretched to the limit already. If it is a catastrophic over-reach, then hopefully the western powers that be will gracefully bow out of the ring, instead of throwing another sucker punch when they think nobody's looking.
Yes, view from Russia is important, thanks Ken, going to read it later,
Grettir, danke
it took long enough for me to find out somethings about history, but enough not to be easly diverted. And about Hitler and Germany (3.Reich) there is the most propaganda made till today, daily. So my picture is not complete, but I know from witness and documents of the time, that it was rather normal life these 6 years before the war, and I would call present times more demonic, even in terms of propaganda considering massmedia-lies of today.
But we have lived a long time under the threat of the atomic-war and influenced by this threat.. Thinking about that, I would not know anything more totalitarian.
Still there is much to be investigated and weighted to get a more complete picture.
I am not a great admirer of the theory of 'totalitarianism', but it is preferable to the idle search for authentic communists.
I might just repeat that I find the theory of fascism much more useful than the theory of 'nazism', because 'nazism' seems to me to be a unique case from which inferences should not be made, whereas fascism, in its specific mussolinian form, and in its jabotinskyan zionist form, follows predictable patterns, such as capitulating to clerical vested interests (which usually means landowners, but in the jewish case means international financiers, who are the corresponding patron class).
this is interesting, though unconvincing in many respects:
http://tonykaron.com/2008/01/31/...emiel-or-bushs/
eBay buys Israeli startup for $169m
Gil Ronen, IsraelNN.com
http://www.israelnationalnews.co...ews.aspx/
125103
US online auctioning giant eBay has purchased Israeli online risk tools startup Fraud Sciences for $169 million, Israel21c reported. Following years of intensive research, Fraud Sciences has developed a technology that differentiates between real and fraudulent transactions with unprecedented accuracy. Using this groundbreaking technology, Fraud Sciences offers a unique transaction verification service to manage online fraud. The small privately owned company only raised $7 million in investment before the buy-out. Fraud Sciences' technology is designed to uncover fraudulent credit card purchases by verifying that the customer making the purchase is in fact the card's owner. "At PayPal we use the same type of tools, and we feel that Fraud Sciences technology is going to be very complementary," PayPal spokeswoman Sarah Gorman told InternetNews.com. Gorman said that Fraud Sciences' technology will build on what PayPal calls its "neural detection technique," which "literally gets smarter with every transaction." Fraud Sciences has claimed that its system is 99.9 percent accurate, significantly reducing the chance that a fraudulent transaction will be accepted, as well as the chance that legitimate purchases will be rejected. The technology works by evaluating a composite of the purchaser's digital history to ensure that he is both a real person and the authorized cardholder. Further details regarding the system are secret. Risk tools relating to identity verification will improve the security of online transactions executed through PayPal, but eBay's payment-services division has run into other types of fraud over the years, particularly phishing. This term refers to scammers who send e-mail to individuals in which they pose as legitimate companies – like eBay or PayPal – in order to lure their victims into giving up their credit card numbers and other information. Tel Aviv-based Fraud Sciences was founded in April 2006 by Shvat Shaked and Sa'ar Wilf. They will be joining PayPal's technology and fraud management teams. Investors in Fraud Sciences include Redpoint Ventures, BRM Capital and entrepreneur Eli Barkat, who acquired a 40% stake in the firm for $5 million. He is set to make 12 times that amount in the exit. eBay and its subsidiary, e-commerce enabler PayPal, have been facing an increasingly difficult battle against online fraud. They plan to use Fraud Science's risk tools and analytics to expose scams and deceptions targeted at their companies, and to accelerate the development of the next generation of fraud detection tools.
I AM NOW PLANNING EVEN GREATER EVILS!!
I AM TAKING THE COCOA OUT OF CHOCOLATE BARS!
hahahahahahahaha!!!
Take the well known German inability to design anything that isn't crap. As my engineering lecturers in university used to drum into us - don't look to the Germans, their design has always been bad to the point of idiotic. And the Holocaust provides perfect proof of this..
Fritz | 01.31.08 - 7:25 pm |
Hope you don't mind me reassuring you that the guy who wrote it was being satirical. He really was.
Rowan Berkeley | Homepage | 02.01.08 - 1:55 am | #
Who else has made fraud into a science?
Hoarsewhisper, You might enjoy this article by the irrepressible Gary Brecher in the eXile:
". . . My second point was that if we send our old fashioned carrier battle groups into the Gulf in wartime, they won't come out. They'll make excellent dive sites. . ."
http://www.exile.ru/articles/det...CK_ID=35&
PAGE=1
The exile is rather sophmoric; it's obviously aimed at young randy ex-pat males in Russia. But still amusing to look at, and The War Nerd is always worth reading.
Why have I become anonymous?
US taxpayer | 01.31.08 - 8:33 pm
McCain cannot defeat Clinton unless Iraq is stabilized by election time with no US troop(s) killed or wounded in the past months proximate.
In other words, you're wrong.
Hedging....unless another "terror" attack occurs domestically,pre-election, then all bets are off.
Rowan Berkeley | Homepage | 02.01.08 - 12:55 am
you imbue the internationals with too much spirituality here.
Wager you 100 shekels.
US taxpayer | 01.31.08 - 8:33 pm | #
You're on USt. And I'll raise you 100 Amero's I think that McCain (R)-pun intended... is being set up to fall prostrate under Hillary.
But the "house" establishment is hedging their bet, so it doesn't really matter which one of those gets in, they still have their sock puppet.
I think Ann Coulter made an excellent point. If McCain gets the nomination, the Republicans should vote for Hillary or for the Third Party, just to make sure that what happens here on does not get blamed on the Republican Party by default.
can this be so?
from a comment:
http://www.modernhistoryproject....Date=2008-01-
13
This stealth technique has been practiced by the Fabian Socialists for over a century, and their utopia is almost at hand. The engineered "Hooverian" economic crisis we are now facing will pave the way for the new "Rooseveltian" collectivist dictatorship -- run by the same oligarchs that created the crisis to begin with. This season, Bush is playing the role of Hoover while Hillary is slated to play the role of Roosevelt with some psychic help from Eleanor's ghost.
Fritz - quite poetic and quite plausible. Good find.
In other words, you're wrong.
Ken Hoop | 02.01.08 - 12:01 pm | #
Finally a comprehensible statement from the Hoopster.
And a verifiable one. See you (and Juan's 100 ameros) in November.
Test
Still haven't researched the actual %
of actual Jews on antiwar.com and got back, unpaid taxes.
Paul: Purpose of Constitution forgotten .. Sat, 02 Feb 2008
Presidential hopeful Ron Paul says although America is falling from the purpose of the Constitution, it is not too late to change pace.
"What is frightening today is the war on terrorism, which has instilled fear in us,"
http://www.presstv.ir/
detail.asp...ctionid=3510203
Ron Paul's supporters - Paulenteers - say the Republican congressman's message of 'freedom, peace and prosperity' resonates with them and that time has come to repair the bad image of the United States in the international arena.
Still haven't researched the actual %
of actual Jews on antiwar.com and got back, unpaid taxes.
Ken Hoop | 02.02.08 - 3:06 pm | #
-- be careful ken - if it hadn't been for the phrase "and got back, unpaid taxes" you might have accidentally made sense for once.
Ken Hoop | 02.02.08 - 3:06 pm | #
Huh?
Remember Chris Rock?
"There will never be a black vice-president. Know why? Because some black guy would shoot the President. He'd go to jail where he'd be treated like a hero."
The comma says I got it right, RB.
I presume of course Clinton will stress her "two months and out of Iraq" line during the campaign; of course I don't accept that she will keep her word after defeating McCain.
Buchanan and Raimondo issue two sharp attacks on McCain in
www.amconmag.com new edition.
Commenting by HaloScan
