1.2 Million dead in Tibet?
Geez, it seems the body-count hyper-inflation of useful victims is only matched by the occlusion of the millions of useless Sand Niggers, Nips, Krauts, Gooks, Dagos, Palis, Kulaks etc killed in the US imperial wars.
Dalai Lama on CIA payroll?
http://www.timboucher.com/journa...on-cia-payroll/
Sorry about the Kulaks mistake: same commissars, different countries....
This Nicholson Baker guy might be onto a new literary genre of truth_as_fiction rather than the usual tired old fiction_as_truth.
He might get away with it if he leaves the joos as the eternal victims.
But it's one thing to blame America for the attack on America. That's hardly radical. No, if you really want to lay waste to the notion of historical truth and the fundamental principles on which Western democratic society is based, then you need to go one step further. You need to blame America for the attack on Nazi Germany.
So the entire notion of historical truth and the current fundamentals of Western democratic society are all rooted in the myths created in the aftermath of WWII. Sounds like a pretty shaky foundation to me, one that will lay waste to itself without much help from anyone else.
You need to blame America for the attack on Nazi Germany.
Quite a lot of truth in that, if tales are true that Roosevelt was pumping up the Poles to attack Germany in the years pre-WWII.
Chamberlain knew well how senseless the war would be, and his last desperate attempt to avoid it was to beg Roosevelt to apply pressure to the Poles.
It's essential for healthy intellectual debate that conventional wisdom is challenged. However, that requires an engagement with reality, not its negation. The mentality that sees 9/11 and 7/7 as government conspiracies, and the Second World War as a singular tale of Allied guilt, refuses to see what's staring it in the face, so has no choice but to search for buried clues. Sometimes, though, the apparent is true because the only thing hidden is lies.
What's staring us in the face is a global concerted effort to manage the perceptions of the majority regarding what is truth, what is reality. The truth does not need to be managed or enforced. Lies require constant management and the threat of violence to be sustained. Which do you see emerging in our new world order?
The black and white, good vs. evil fairy tale now peddled as official history of the 20th century has never made any sense. What they work overtime to sell us as apparent and indisputable, is in fact an insult to anyone able to think for themselves, anyone who believes in the innate power, goodness and grace of the human soul.
Nations, empires, cultures, races, tribes have always depended on myths as a foundation. The enforced orthodoxy of holocaustianity is a poisonous myth and must be replaced in order to build a better Western world.
bear in mind it is just a non supernaturalist reading of the passion narrative, with the entire 'people of israel' as the dying and resurrected god.
The traditional sense of God was certainly dead to the West after WWII, so replace the supernatural elements with earthly caricatures and continue on, business as usual. Hitler's Germany is now the devil (proxy for the white race). The chosen are born Godlike, supreme, sublime, unassailable. The rest simply bystanders who's whispered references to THEM display the reverence and fear once shown for the supernatural God.
I've already pre-ordered Nicholson Baker's book so I won't pretend objectivity.
So...
1. Baker is already a published author. He know what gets in print and what gets pulped in manuscript.
2. The issue then is: How to raise fundamental questions about WORLD WAR II, the event that created the world we live in, WITHOUT getting effectively banned?
3. For starters, stick to convention: In my part of America, calling FDR a dictator has never been considered fighting words, or even out of the ordinary.
4. More starters: Churchill's rep goes round and round and always has. Discussions about Churchill raise issues of war crimes and duplicity. Like FDR, he's never been off limits.
5. From the starters, Nicholson's strategy (if he has one) would be to take the "conventional" hazing of FDR and Churchill and blow it up to cosmic levels and PRESTO!
6... You use what CAN be done to imply what really WAS done.
We CAN slam FDR. We CAN slam Winnie.
By going in the obvious direction with what he CAN do, Nicholson can cast enough light on a subject (WWII) otherwise so infantilized by the conventional portrayals that no one thinks of the horrendous effect on the human race this war really had.
It's possible. Because the book ain't out yet and the MSM is nervous.
7. Nicholson's book is falling into a pattern.
Here in the US, bright readers have already absorbed historian Thomas Fleming's The New Dealer's War, an outrageous but totally factual account of the REAL Roosevelt administration and the shenanigans employed by same to goad the Japanese into "starting the war." In fact Fleming makes it clear that Roosevelt ALREADY "started the war"; the Japanese Navy just started the honest shooting phase.
8. Nicholson's book is falling into a pattern.
The chinks in the armor of conventional thinking is where you must concentrate fire. Speaking of the Japanese: The first chink in WWII's armor was Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Lots of vets didn't want to hear it, but after the pile-up of Washington's malfeasence since, it's no longer controversial to state the obvious: Those bombings were not necessary. Frying civilian Japanese in a war already won in 1945 was as insane as poisoning Iraqis in a war they could never defend themselves from since 1991.
Nicholson's on the right track: Find the sore spot. Punch hard. The empire has weaknessess.
The War of Civilizations script must be recast to place the Jewism as the principal nemesis of humanity, for the term to make any objective sense.
Jewism counts among its adherents Cheney, Gaffney, Rockefellers and the entire Bilderberger Club, while necessarily omitting plain living Jews minding their own business instead of plotting satanic ways of nurturing the misery of "Others".
War must be declared on Warmongers.
I think that the current Pope and the upper echelon of Christianity, Catholic and otherwise are all converts to Jewism.
Sorry to say that, having been raised a catholic but the conclusion is inescapable, maybe even Dalai Lama is a sellout. Maybe.
After seeing the idiot Muslim guy paraded before cameras on Passover/Easter as a Zion loving convert, I nearly barfed.
No Mass for me fellas, no mas, I don't want your matzo Eucharist.
You're welcome at my home lobro. Such as it is.
I keep replaying the scenes of Cuba during my Xmas visit.
Havana is not a large megapolis, yet the island has 11 million inhabitants.
The city is surrounded by farms, it pretty much feeds itself with plain, naturally grown produce and in all likelihood, the same goes for the rest of the country.
They didn't petrochemicalize (sorry for abuse of language) their food supply.
Their tap water is not just potable, it tastes excellent.
They are uniformly well educated, with empahsis on arts, culture and physical health, blessed with nonexistent TV, no advertising, lots of outdoor socializing, equality in poverty.
Of course, their luck lies in having been declared a pariah and isolated from the rest of the world, left to their own devices, without mineral resources to invite the attention of the Zionist ghouls.
Now compare that to the reverse evolution that took place in the Zion's principal petri dish, USA, many of them deformed physically, mentally and morally beyond recognition, resembling humans as much as KFC's "chicken" resemble the real thing.
When the global house built of stale shit collapses, I suspect that Cuba will be an oasis of sanity in the world prostrate before Antichrist.
(the latter entity makes more sense to me as a real thing than Christ, btw)
Thank you, hp, and you to mine, such as it is.
The Poor Brothers shall prevail.
Being poor is a lot more fun than just talking about it.
Lots of coleslaw..
Don't talk with your mouth full, hp 
But I do detect both edges to what you are saying.
Not that I dispute either one.
I wouldn't trade it for all the farms in Cuba.
Well, maybe one..
Buenas noches, amigo.
from:
President Roosevelt's Campaign To Incite War in Europe:
The Secret Polish Documents
MARK WEBER
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/
v04p1...p135_Weber.html
Carl J. Burckhardt, the League of Nations High Commissioner to Danzig, reported in his postwar memoirs on a remarkable conversation held at the end of 1938 with Anthony Drexel Biddle, the American Ambassador to Poland. Biddle was a rich banker with close ties to the Morgan financial empire. A thoroughgoing internationalist, he was an ideological colleague of President Roosevelt and a good friend of William Bullitt. Burckhardt, a Swiss professor, served as High Commissioner between 1937 and 1939.
Nine months before the outbreak of armed conflict, on 2 December 1938, Biddle told Burckhardt with remarkable satisfaction that the Poles were ready to wage war over Danzig...
'In April,' he [Biddle] declared, 'a new crisis would break out. Not since the torpedoing of the Lusitania [in 1915] had such a religious hatred against Germany reigned in America as today! Chamberlain and Daladier [the moderate British and French leaders] would be blown away by public opinion. This was a holy war![21]
The fateful British pledge to Poland of 31 March 1939 to go to war against Germany in case of a Polish-German conflict would not have been made without strong pressure from the White House...
The French writer, Madame de Stael, romantically portrayed for the Napoleonic world of the early nineteenth century a Germany utterly unlike the grotesque image later drawn by the Allied propagandists of two World Wars. Madame de Stael's Germans were a nation of "Poets and Thinkers," a race of kindly, impractical, other-worldly dreamers without national prejudices and, strangely, in the light of later propaganda, "disinclined to war."2
http://www.ihr.org/books/
connors...linginhate.html
from the last link
During World War II this stream of Germanophobic literature reached flood tide proportions. The situation in the cinema and radio was, if anything, worse. The "hate Germany" motive seemed uppermost even in our top level strategic planning. Indeed, our entire wartime policy can very well be summed up as one of "Unconditional Hatred," to borrow Russell Grenfell's apt term. This driving, irrational impulse seemed to operate without reference to, and even to the exclusion of, all other goals.
Perhaps the definitive repudiation of the myth that Germany was plotting global conquest in 1939 (apart from the lack of documentary evidence in support of that melodramatic conviction) is to be found in the amazing fact that Germany was, in reality, ill-prepared both militarily and economically when the war came. The most complete study of this important subject is that of an American economist, Burton H. Klein,61 who, pointing out that in Germany "there was no real mobilization of manpower prior to the outbreak of war," continues to say: "Thus, whether we examine the general nature of German economic recovery, or the raw material self-sufficiency program, or the mobilization of manpower, the same general conclusion is evident: The scale of Germany's economic mobilization for war was quite modest."62 As A. J. P. Taylor recently expressed it: "Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership."63
Drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, and there's no telling how many Magdi Allams you'll find.
lobro | 03.23.08 - 10:41 pm
The neutered religious leaders have certainly turned deafening silence and/or obsequious compliance with political correctness into an art form. Anything to keep their smocks, frocks, dresses, skirts, cassocks, robes, blouses, jewellery, funny hats, pantaloons and pensions undisturbed, I suppose...
Imo War must be declared on Warmongers should be Number 1 in the forthcoming People's Bill of Rights.
smekh, hoarse - a double yes.
I love Hebrew, e.g.,
The author [Adam Kirsch] compares Baker to the 9/11 'Truthers', "the most egregious example of this mushrooming cult" of "intellectual nihilism".
All kinds of lovely trinkets here.
Their hate of the concept of truth is astounding, Truthers=nihilism (intellectual), i.e., an intellectual should concern himself with inventing and defending lies, so that only a Jew is blessed with a toolkit worthy of an intellectual.
What is more, truth seems to threaten their very existence, because it is equivalent to nihilism, an existential threat.
No wonder Jesus is such a bogeyman.
And, horrors, this threat is mushrooming in a most apocalyptic sense, shades of Mel Gibson ...
By the word "reality" that jewish writer means "the lies we jews demand that you goyim believe"
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Just say No to Talmud.
Don't you love the scare quotes around Hitler's "peace" terms? It would have been peace, but not a peace jews would have liked - ergo, not peace at all!
maybe time to start using quotes around "Hitler" as well ... the idea being that the whole construct is borne of political myth making.
Jews are as devoted to peace as mosquitoes to swamp draining, for the same reasons.
Commenting by HaloScan
