I'll meet you. what time?
rew | Homepage | 01.27.06 - 3:57 pm | #

ETA is 5:ish.
Flash | Homepage | 01.27.06 - 4:05 pm | #

see you there.
rew | Homepage | 01.27.06 - 4:06 pm | #

One problem with Amy is that I fear her to be the type of politico that will go along with DC to get along. It's been a long while since the Democrats have had a candidate like that, you'll have to go back more than 50 years. Our Senators have been strong national figures while the Republicans have produced party syncophants (sp?). Her inability (actually its a calculated refusal) to answer certain hot button questions is something I point to. None-the-less, she is leaps and bounds over the empty suit, not ready for prime time player the GOP is trying to push on us.
---------------------------

Do you owe me something for making the call on Wetterling in the face of your analysis?
StPaul_DFLer | 01.28.06 - 3:08 pm | #

"Do you owe me something for making the call on Wetterling in the face of your analysis?"

I've never wavered from my Spring 2005 desire: "I would still put my money on a Klobuchar Senate, Wetterling 6th pairing."

The posts regarding Wetterling's departure from the race was a collection of other screeds throughout the blogosphere. The mere fact she has money that can only be spent on a National race was the clincher for me. Reliable sources inform me that was the final piece of her ultimate decison to return to the 6th. We'll know more next week.

Flash
Flash | Homepage | 01.28.06 - 4:03 pm | #

sounds like a good strategy to me, not...have a candidate in a Republican leaning district campaign with a Democrat running statewide.

And what about El Tinklenberg and the fact that Wetterling said she would not run out there?
joe | 01.29.06 - 2:00 pm | #

Looks like ol' El is S.O.L.

He is being advised by Janet Robert. Hopefully there will be some graceful way all can benefit.
StPaul_DFLer | 01.29.06 - 8:08 pm | #