(Trolls: Off topic or offensive remarks will be deleted. If you don't like it, GET YOUR OWN BLOG)
|
|
You're really stoking that fire! Good.
Mike's America |
Homepage |
12.08.06 - 11:26 am | #
|
|
I'm a liberal and I regularly blast radical Muslims on my blog. I wish they would drop by for a visit, they'd first notice my proud liberalism and then they'd notice how anti-Jihadist I am as well. It would be a joy to tweak their twisted minds.
Eclectic Infidel |
Homepage |
12.08.06 - 6:37 pm | #
|
|
Eclectic Infidel:
They don't bother with you probably because they don't perceive you as an enemy. Any liberal is on their side, no matter what you say to them, because you vote the way they want you to vote, and your hostility to Christians supports them.
You see, Christians and Muslims are ancient enemies. It was Christian Europe, during the Crusades, which expelled and defeated Islam when it began to spread by the sword in Christendom.
We know each other well.
atheling2 |
Homepage |
12.08.06 - 7:30 pm | #
|
|
Very astute!! They want to use the blind, godless multiculturalists to advance their cause. The more intolerance they reveal the less they will be tolerated by the left.
genevieve |
Homepage |
12.08.06 - 7:43 pm | #
|
|
Those comments by well wisher are a scream! I'm so touched at his concern for us infidels. This surely must be a splendid example of the Muslim Man's Burden to save us from ourselves. Well, thanks for the concern but no thanks. Well wisher needs to go to Cesspoolia and lift it out of the mess Islam has made of it for 1400 years. He will have plenty to do there.
ISLAMSFORLOSERS |
12.08.06 - 8:25 pm | #
|
|
Unreal. I had to laugh at the things he was condemning us - you - me - for. I have been married for 18 years, have been faithful to my husband, have worked hard raising my kids and teaching them. Yet - - I would still be extremely happy to pop an islamist who was threatening me right between the eyes. Then I'd rub pork fat all over 'im.
The leftist weenies wouldn't do that, would they?! No! They'd don the freaking burkha for 'im.
Not me.
Monica-Philadelphia |
Homepage |
12.08.06 - 9:46 pm | #
|
|
Good post!
It's all Takkiyah -- Muslims can lie and posture in any way they deem necessary to carry out their deceptions, the goal being infiltration of western society. Once they've achieved their ends, their first priority will be to murder all those lefties who helped them do so.
I'm finally reading America Alone and wow! It's like having the truth punch one in the gut, from the first sentence forward. Tremendous!
A few years ago I read a column by the Twit (my nickname for Maureen Dowd) where she described a run-in, while in Saudi, with the religious police over her attire. She wrote that while the kerfuffle was in progress, she noted some stores along the lines of "Frederick's of Hollywood" in the background. Go figure.
Seth |
Homepage |
12.09.06 - 2:29 am | #
|
|
Most excellent post... the more these frauds are exposed, the better. We need to get the crusades going again, and blast these slimy islamists/muslims back into the dark ages. There is no peaceful muslim, that will go public, they all climbed out of the same septic tank.
History repeats itself.... sigh...
ABF |
Homepage |
12.09.06 - 10:03 am | #
|
|
Atheling, I suggest that there is a deeper purpose to this baiting. The purpose is jointly shariaists and leftist. It affects your freedom of speech. It is affecting press, in the form of internet freedoms. It affects the ultimate freedom of all of us.
Haven't you noticed those little flags at some sites, where they say something to the effect of "flag this" site, post or whatever as offensive? Major search sites then are using these flags as an excuse to dump or not display the sites. If you haven't read posts about conservatively slanted video's not displaying on YouTube, or Google not displaying conservative sites in search results or setting them to the back, you need to do some searching.
The freedom of speech of all conservatives, and by that I mean the average person, who legitimately fall between liberal to actual reactionaries are being denied. We are losing the power of press which we thought we had found on the internet. You know the speech and the sites that will be suppressed by this simple deceptive means, as yours will be one of them. They will use the excuse that they had no choice because of the number of offensive flags. They do not offer more explanation.
Wake up and raise hell. All of us. Get to know persons whom you can discuss things freely with. Don't rely on the internet being there. We have already had more voice than the left would normally allow, in their perfect world. Their perfect world is without freedom for the individual.
Flanders Fields |
12.09.06 - 10:29 am | #
|
|
Atheling, I would like to refer you to a comment made by Sam at BJ, titled Why tolerance and understanding will not work with muslims. I mention it because it is easy to overlook some of the comments, and I'm sure you will want to see it.
Flanders Fields |
12.09.06 - 2:47 pm | #
|
|
I'm a cowardly faggot liberal who can't wait for Muslims to stick it up my arse.
Edited By Siteowner
KEvron |
Homepage |
12.09.06 - 5:44 pm | #
|
|
I witnessed Muslim hypocracy up close and personal many years ago.I was training into Istanbul from Vienna. I was sharing the compartment with two Muslim men returning to Turkey from work in Germany. As we neared the Turk border the Muslim guys started chucking their bottles of left over booze and pork sausages out the window.
When I asked why they did that, they said Islam and Al'lah forbids drinking alchohol and eating pork. But, doesn't Al'lah see you doing the forbidden things in Germany, I asked. The two guys just looked at me blankly, then giggled as if they'd pulled a fast one on God.
Yeah, good luck with that.
Indigo Red |
Homepage |
12.09.06 - 7:14 pm | #
|
|
By nine year olds no doubt!
dcat still @it |
Homepage |
12.09.06 - 9:57 pm | #
|
|
The dirty little dick rags!
dcat still @it |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 12:53 am | #
|
|
Muslims in bed with Liberals? Figuratively speaking, yes.
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend..."
Adding you to my blogroll - great blog & insightfull posts.
Tom |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 3:33 am | #
|
|
Atheling,
Actually it was earlier than that. Charles Martel at Poitiers 732 stemmed the tide of antagonistic, spread the so-called word by the crescent sword, freedom hating Muslims.
You see, the Crusades are what is thrown at every Christian to PROVE we are and always will be imperialistic, but the people who make these arguments don't want to go back about 400 years earlier when Muslim spread by the crescent sword, fire, and murder.
I've realized and many others need to realize that the Muslim troubles were self inflicted when they decided to expand by war and murder in the 700s.
W.F. |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 10:09 am | #
|
|
W.F.:
Earlier than what? I don't know what you're referencing.
atheling2 |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 10:53 am | #
|
|
Dammit...I was so hoping to skim over coldfire's longwinded, insightful rambling nonsense.
wordsmith |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 5:52 pm | #
|
|
WF is referring to what LED to the Christian Crusades - - which was the bloody and violent spread of islam and the attempt to conquer europe.
Nobody likes to think of that time before the Crusades.
Monica-Philadelphia |
Homepage |
12.10.06 - 9:51 pm | #
|
|
Monica,
Oh, I include that in my reference; that's probably why I didn't understand why he brought it up.
atheling2 |
Homepage |
12.11.06 - 8:12 am | #
|
|
Sorry to be late to this party. In reflecting over this, I don't believe we're dealing with hypocrisy, rather this is the consequence of an interesting incongruity.
You see the "right" is paradoxically the group that forcefully upholds Western civilization as something worth defending, while at the same time attacking the immorality in our society (e.g homosexual marriage, adultery, fornication, immodest dress, pornography, drugs).
Conversely, the "left" comprises many who advocate "immorality" but they are also critical and hostile of Western societies, and in a significant number of cases, eagerly welcome or even advocate the downfall of the U.S. and other Western powers.
And then, the Christians tend to populate the "right" more than the "left".
So as a Muslim dedicated to the whole world worshipping Allah and being ruled by Sharia, since neither side is totally with or totally against your views, you then have to make a tactical decision as to which group at present is your more allied with you and which is your greater enemy - do your choose on the basis of politics (bringing down the West), or moral views, or religion.
Clearly, the priority of the Islamists is the overthrown of the Western nations; morality can take a back seat for now. Later on, of course, as we are starting to see in Somalia, enforcement of Sharia will take a front seat, and then our liberals too late will discover a rather unpleasant surprise when the behavior license that have taken for granted under Western democracy is taken away from them.
civil truth |
12.14.06 - 12:38 pm | #
|
|
Jesus (God is not a man that He should lie) said, the "thief (that's the devil; he is also known as the father of lies) comes to steal, kill and destroy". Now let's see, what religion teaches it is OK to "steal, kill and destroy...and lie"??
Remember "The Sword of the Spirit which is the Word of God". Christians must pray for souls, but we can curse things like organizations that do not bear fruit.
Joyce |
01.13.08 - 5:21 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|