I'MMA LET YOU FINISH
HUGH HEWITT, "BLOG" AUTHOR???
Frist author!!!
Blog Author [and not Blogger]? Is that done on the Judo Range? Has the Horse Doctor been contacted? Maybe we could get a Newspaper Writer to do a conversation story on him, and a picture taker can immortalize and flatten his image.
Blogging are real journalists and people like Powerline and like InstaPundit
AH-HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!
What, he was serious?
I ain't read nuttin about them commie bluggers writers before, but Bill O'Reilly told me all I'll ever need to know about them traiters.
the point here that is still be obfuscated by the right wing lying machine is that a well-known conservative commentator was given public funds to promote a position. so a couple of private consultants took some privately raised money to promote their candidate?
where's the controversy, again?
$
I can't handle this many wankers in one day.
Well, isn't it obvious that anyone named: Hugh Hewitt is going to be a wanker? And he is, oh yes he most certainly is.
Bleh.
Is this more crony capitalism or is this a serious surveillence concern
FBI surveillance experts have put their once-controversial Carnivore Internet surveillance tool out to pasture, preferring instead to use commercial products to eavesdrop on network traffic, according to documents released Friday.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/200...ires_carnivore/
Das Uberwanker.
TMP has a link for us to use to voice our objection to using our SS money to fund the SS PR campaign to convice us that SS has no money and so should be destroyed (ok - now I realize that there is indeed no way to use irony when talking about this adminstration)
you know what to do...
How many cranks
Would a wanker wank
If a wanker could crank wood?
Dan Dierdorf is a complete idiot. "Was that a 28 yard field goal"
"No, that was last week!"
I remember listening to him once do an ABC Wide World of Sports boxing match -- I think one of the fighters was Lennox Lewis. He kept calling the clinches as "lovey dovey, huggy" or something. This totally pissed off his competebt co-announcer, I think his name as Wallou (spelling? and could the first name possibly been Wally?)
Proof that the contant head banging causes brain damage?
looks like nobody wants to win this afc game.
I can't handle this many wankers in one day.
Buck up.
How many cranks
Would a wanker wank
If a wanker could crank wood?
Too many, unfortunately. That's why we're in the present mess. Dumb wankers.
What, he was serious?
Hewitt's got a book called "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat: Crushing the Democrats in Every Election and Why Your Life Depends On It".
A major fruitcake. Projection doesn't just happen in theaters, you know.
Why is it that everyone "assumes" that right-wing pundits read? Let alone keep up-to-date with current affairs?
Of course, that those on the left were doing "something" means that its wrong...I wonder if they too are guilty of their own rules as well.
Its the smoke and mirrors routine. Their guy got caught with his hand in the cookie-jar that was being fed from Federal coffers. So now they have to find some trivial nuiance the left was doing and paint it up to look as if the Left was far more guilty than their shill.
It doesn't matter that they haven't a legal, morale, or ethical point. Their rank-and-file believers will come to the conclusion, based on the facts given by those they trust, that the Left is guilty of far worst deeds and that what their guy did is nothing but trivial.
The sad fact is that their scam will win the hearts and minds of the intended audiance..which is not the Left.
You're all being baited into an argument you can't win. Turn the tables on them instead.
regards
.
Dumber cranks.
looks like nobody wants to win this afc game.
The Jets and victory are a bit like magnets with their negative poles facing each other...
Clearly conservatives now just want to defuse the Armstrong Williams embarrassment with this little manufactured and completely bogus scandal.
AAAAARRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!
Fucking idiots.
ot, but tom ricks of wapo is on pumpkinhead's program and sounding extremely alarmed about what lies ahead in iraq. one nightmare scenario is of bases being overrun in the near future because the insurgents' tactics have shown increasing sophistication.
the current level of violence leading up to the election is expected to increase FOLLOWING the election.
Hewitt's got a book called "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat: Crushing the Democrats in Every Election and Why Your Life Depends On It".
DAMN those sneaky Democrats, trying to get everyone to vote and be counted! That oughta be illegal!
I believe the Dems should go with the *I know nothing* offense, except I'm not sure who the Dems are anymore.
Unfortunately for Dean, it looks like two sides are coming at him.
Dan Dierdorf. Maybe they should have appointed him to the Whitewater investigation.
Hugh Hewitt: Lying sack of shit. End of story. Future visitor to the Duck Pit.
the current level of violence leading up to the election is expected to increase FOLLOWING the election.
Allawi will run the country from behind a barricade, cut off from the Iraqi citizens.
That could NEVER happen in the good ol' US of A...
Aw, shit.
Strange things on the radio overseas...Bush was admitting that a lot of his First Term rhetoric was way off base?
That his use of "bring it on" was not the tone he intended to set?
There were many other "quotes" that Bush himself addressed that was quite shocking to hear him admit he was wrong in the way in which he used it.
Seems that all the bragging and contemptous tones he relied on, he is admitting were wrong.
Seems that there should be a lot of discussion on that. Like WMD for instance.
Can anyone give me some insight?
regards
.
I think TalkLeft understates the level of wankerdom coming from Hugh Hewitt. If you stop by his blog, he talks about the "Kos/Armstrong/Williams" controversy, like they are one thing. Talk about disingenous. And of course all his commentary is directed at Kos. What slime ball.
Seems that all the bragging and contemptous tones he relied on, he is admitting were wrong.
It may seem that way to you. I'm glad.
We'll never hear it in this country, however.
Can anyone give me some insight?
See above.
If you stop by his blog, he talks about the "Kos/Armstrong/Williams" controversy, like they are one thing. Talk about disingenous. And of course all his commentary is directed at Kos. What slime ball.
This is the Thune Bloggers/Atrios/Media Matters fiasco all over again...
Only much, much worse.
Moad-Dib - You're all being baited into an argument you can't win. Turn the tables on them instead.
And what exactly does "turn the tables on them" mean?
...and why your life depends on it.
No fearmongering there. We guess...our lives depend on it because of...IX/XI?
And what exactly does "turn the tables on them" mean?
We need to get The Sphinx to work as a Democratic consultant.
***Strange things on the radio overseas...Bush was admitting that a lot of his First Term rhetoric was way off base?
That his use of "bring it on" was not the tone he intended to set?
There were many other "quotes" that Bush himself addressed that was quite shocking to hear him admit he was wrong in the way in which he used it.***
Rove told him that not being able to think of any mistakes he had made wasn't playing well. So they prepped for the Baba Wawa interview and the inevitable question by agreeing to admit to a "mistake" as a symbolic gesture of pseduo-humility. Not the invasion & war or the lies about WMD or the abuses of prisoners or the casualties on both sides...
...but, you know, sorry that "bring it on" thing was misinterpreted.
That's my take on it, anyway.
Pie,
I take it that what I heard on the radio over here wasn't meant for US audiances? I find that strange. Maybe it'll be aired in a couple of days in the US?
It was an interview of some type and Bush was being quite frank. He even mentioned that after one zinger, Laura let into him. I was taken back and didn't pay attention to spefics about what the interview was. What was being said was an eye opener. They alluded to the fact that some of his famous quotes were off the cuff, like Bring it On, while others , such as Axis of Evil, were from his speech writers.
I was just amazed that he was admitting on the radio that some of the things he had said during his first term did more to stir the pot than it did to settle things down.
Chances are, it may be aired tomorrow and Monday. The military is quite redundant about repeating messages and programs at the very least 3 times in as many consecutive days.
Will keep you all posted...gonna take notes.
regards
.
...but, you know, sorry that "bring it on" thing was misinterpreted.
Yep, Bush's only mistake, aside form hiring bozos like O'Neill & Clarke, was in saying something which could be twisted by the shamelessly amoral liberal media into sounding just a *teensy* bit belligerent and un-statesmanlike...
Tena...
"And what exactly does "turn the tables on them" mean?"
You're all being baited to react to their stimiuli. Kinda like Pavlov's doggies...salivaing when they hear the bell.
Gotta stop taking their bait and set things up where they react to your stimuli instead.
Its a control-thing and right now, they're in control.
regards
.
Gotta stop taking their bait and set things up where they react to your stimuli instead.
I still can't believe we can't just say, "Torture is evil and wrong! Death squads are evil and wrong! Why are the Republicans in favor of death squads and torture?"
I was told this was a good site for informed opinions from the left. Anyone seen one?
Moad-Dib - Well, gosh, is that all? Wow, it's so easy, how could it have been missed?
Jeez, Moad-Dib, this whole thing started as a Repug reaction to Armstrong Williams. How is that a Pavlovian reaction on our part? They turned around and reacted by going on the offense.
Could you specifically say exactly what you think the Democrats should or could have done? Or the liberal bloggers, for that matter?
I take it that what I heard on the radio over here wasn't meant for US audiances? I find that strange. Maybe it'll be aired in a couple of days in the US?
Oh, my poor darling...
Clearly, liberals and Democrats who support liberal or Democratic candidates are asking for whatever comes their way. They need to get with the program, endorse the Boy King, and then the rightwing media will no longer be forced to slander or libel them.
Kinda like it's the Jews fault that Hitler murdered them. If they hadn't been living in Europe, it never would have happened. They have no one to blame but themselves, right?
Kinda like it's the Jews fault that Hitler murdered them. If they hadn't been living in Europe, it never would have happened.
Or if they'd at least been more supportive about Hitler's policies, like the one about exterminating them.
I was told this was a good site for informed opinions from the left.
Where in the world did you hear that?
According to the conservative shit-weasels, there is no such thing as informed opinions on the left because we are all pawns of Osama bin Laden,the liberal Media,and the Communist Party.
"It's true! It's true! Some people say."
The truth is, we're all just a bunch of mischievious Fun-Hogs who are fucking with the status quo because we hate America.
Thank you for the opportunity to clear that up.
Tena
Who is in a better position to take action on this? Not the media or the blogs.
However, there are some Democrats in the Legislature, both House and Senate, that are itching to pick a fight with the Republicans on the respective floors. A fight that they don't have to defend for a change, but can heap a whole lotta hurt on Republicans.
We all need to start supporting those Democrats. By doing so, we will turn the tables on the Republicans. Squabbling over the internet is what Republicans expect of Democrats, but taking definite steps using legal, parlimentary actions on the House and Senate floors will get their attention .
There's nothing more infuriating that a cocky minority party that wields its clout like its a majority. That's the first step in turning the tables.
If that's too hard, then go back to your squabbling.
regards
.
Its after 2 am...good nite
regards
.
Is it 2008 yet?
"however, there are some democrats in the legislature, both house and senate, that are itching to pick a fight with the republicans. . ."-moad-dib
uuhhh. . .
really?
like who?
I agree about the Democrats getting all plucky and all in Congress, but ----
what could they possibly do about Kos and Jerome being accused of being unethical?
I guess we've been talking at cross purposes. I've been talking about a real situation, and you've been talking about something else.
Maybe what we should do is focus attention on Armstrong, before defending the bloggers. Let them see what the more important problem is. And the key phrase, in my opinion, is "using our tax dollars". Hammer that one all the time -- they're taking our tax dollars and using them to spread their propaganda! They're stealing our tax money!"
Now, what were those guys saying about bloggers again?
Ok - see you guys later, or in the morning.
be nice. 
We all need to start supporting those Democrats. By doing so, we will turn the tables on the Republicans. Squabbling over the internet is what Republicans expect of Democrats, but taking definite steps using legal, parlimentary actions on the House and Senate floors will get their attention .
Who is this guy?
Or is it one of the usual suspects?
Its after 2 am...good nite
Whatevah.
That's *it's*, btw.
'Night, Tena. I'm outta here, too.
Have fun, you guyz.
HUGH HEWITT, "BLOG" AUTHOR???
Hugh has just written a book called "Blog" which makes him the world's foremost expert on blogs, and therefore the guy whom people like O'Reilly are going to call whenever they want to discuss blogs. Hugh's premise is that blogs killed the radio star ... I mean, mainstream media. They did it by exposing the mainstream media's liberal bias, as demonstrated by KerningGate.
Hugh is not just a blog "expert" and major Bushite, he is also an evangelical Christian who wants to make goverment more religious. And he is a big fan of Little Green Footballs. Therefore, he's a major, big-time wanker.
And he is a big fan of Little Green Footballs. Therefore, he's a major, big-time wanker.
Actually, being a fan of LGF makes him more than just a wanker.
It makes him a racist wanker, and a fascist.
People actually pay money to read this wanker's shit. The demise of civilization is imminent.
The Hewitt name is no coincidence. He's a trust fund baby.
A trust fundie to boot.
He is part of the Thune blogging crew as well. ANother eprson who helped smear a veteran like Daschle...
I remember when Fox News had Hewitt and Mike Malloy on "From The Heartland" or whatever the fuck it's called and they "lost connection" with Malloy which only happens to the liberal remote by the way. "This is why you're on sattelite radio and not real radio"-Hewitt to Malloy
Someone should tell Hugh that the moralizing in the center column of his blog is undermined by the "South Dakota Politics" section of his blogroll just to the left that contains both John Lauck and James Van Beek's blogs. Yes, these are the two men who really were paid by the Thune campaign to shill for them and who really didn't disclose it.
Links are on my blog if you're interested. Forgive me for being too lazy to deal with them in comments on Sunday morning.
Clearly, liberals and Democrats who support liberal or Democratic candidates are asking for whatever comes their way. They need to get with the program, endorse the Boy King, and then the rightwing media will no longer be forced to slander or libel them.
If they're sitting around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for us to do that, they're going to get REAL uncomfortable.
I wish the Boy King would be blown to Kingdom Come.
Characters Remaining:
Commenting by HaloScan
