Joe Blow.
watertiger | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:13 am | #

Bush presidency: FIERY WRECK!

Hmmm...I wonder if Hecate had pancakes this morning?
res ipsa loquitur | 02.11.06 - 11:14 am | #

But not vice versa--that's George's job.
Uncle Smokes | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:14 am | #

2nd!
SoCalCommie | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:15 am | #

Errr... 4th!
SoCalCommie | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:15 am | #

The retired CIA guy with the new article claiming the Iraq intelligence was ignored was NotAssrocket's roommate at Dartmouth -- could be trouble at Pajamaline.
P O'Neill | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:16 am | #

Well that says just about everything about Lieberman that needs to be said, doesn't it?
Hecate Malificent | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:16 am | #

Hecate ... Did you have pancakes?
res ipsa loquitur | 02.11.06 - 11:17 am | #

A good picture of Bush rubbing his bald spot would get the cash flowing.
underwhelm | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:18 am | #

He should be honest and change parties. Then, if he's re-elected so be it.
mer | 02.11.06 - 11:23 am | #

Isn't it time that we consider what we gain by having Lieberman in office at all? Does he vote enough with republicans on crucial issues to prevent legitimate demcoratic proposals from going through? If so is it better for us to beat a republican in office or to beat Lieberman in the primaries only to have Lieberman run on a third party ticket and take enough votes away to ensure our loss?
Or is there an alternative?
Would Lieberman running on the third party ticket be enough to draw away republican voters to ensure democrats win the office?
My question is, do we simply want Lieberman out of office and are willing to split the voters to ensure there is more of a chance come the 10' election?

MYOB'
.
MYOB | 02.11.06 - 11:25 am | #

Watched most of the brownie hearings last night.
Lieberman started off pretty good. But like a cheap one-night-stand he turned around and posited that "you may have misled them", meaning bush/card/hagan when he called them Monday AM and PM in Crawford.

Lieberass sucks!
ErinPDX | 02.11.06 - 11:26 am | #

Aren't the people who elected him mad as hell? I wouldn't think all the fundraisers in the world could help that.
Desi | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:27 am | #

Jo-mental???

Loserman thinks he's reading the writing on the wall.

he's a canny political animal.

i hope ned lamont can dump him...

eventually, Lieberman'll pull an anti-Jeffords, at a minimum.

Bernie Sanders'll be the first professed Socialist Senator (iirc; or was LaFollette?)...

here's an intersting technical issue: if Sanders is elected Senator as a Socialist, and the Chamber ends up closely divided for a majority, could Sanders professed Socialism tip the majority to the GOPukes? or is it the case that 'ur either with us or ur agin us'?
anybody know? guess?
WoodyGuthrie'sGuitar (aka | 02.11.06 - 11:31 am | #

Woody - I can't see why it would tip the balance in Congress to the Repugs just because Sanders is a socialist.

I must be missing something in your question -
Tena | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 11:36 am | #

Woody - I can't see why it would tip the balance in Congress to the Repugs just because Sanders is a socialist.

I must be missing something in your question -
Tena - 11:36 am

put it this way: could Sanders' nominal affiliation with a 'third' party disqualify him from providing a decisive vote in a procedural struggle to determine whether Dem or Puke were THE majority (praise the lord it should matter)...

.
WoodyGuthrie'sGuitar (aka | 02.11.06 - 11:44 am | #

put it this way: could Sanders' nominal affiliation with a 'third' party disqualify him from providing a decisive vote in a procedural struggle to determine whether Dem or Puke were THE majority (praise the lord it should matter)...

Sander would probably still caucus with the Democrats.
masculine_monica_nyc | 02.11.06 - 11:46 am | #

Thank God for the internet...( thanks to Al Gore )

We would of never have know about this. But here it is...Wham BAM !!

And Lieberman thought we wouldn't of found out about this.

Ned...PLEASE mention this lobby fundraiser at EVERY campagin stop!!!

.
HereinDC | 02.11.06 - 11:51 am | #

Meet Joe Lieberman, the DINOcrat most likely to have gotten illegal campaign contributions from Abramoff without the knowledge of Howard Dean.
kelley b. | Homepage | 02.11.06 - 12:07 pm | #

Ned...PLEASE mention this lobby fundraiser at EVERY campagin stop!!!

and hit on the GOP LOBBBYIST meme; crooked ass GOoPer LOBBYISTS raising cash for Joe Lieberman. The name Craig Fuller rings some bells. Not good ones.
DemByDefault | 02.11.06 - 12:10 pm | #

Isn't it nice to see such a spirit of bipartisanship in Washington these days.
Orhyvrchcsea | 02.11.06 - 12:26 pm | #

I'll definitely donate to Lamont, but I'm waiting until he actually declairs that he's running.
OyToTheWorld | 02.11.06 - 1:30 pm | #

MABE JOE IS COMING OUT OF THE CLOSET AND COCOON AND WILL EMERGE AS LONG TRUNKED REPUGNUT, THEN HE AND CHIMP CAN BE MORE OPEN WITH THIER MUTUAL ADMIRATION.
hobojo | 02.11.06 - 1:50 pm | #

plop
Z / | 02.11.06 - 1:54 pm | #

DUMP JOE HE IS NOT FOR AMERICA!!
hobojo | 02.11.06 - 1:56 pm | #

The people that pwn America have it good with a two party system. Any party who wins anything, the losing party would also be zionist anti-nationalist globalizers. You, Serf, vote as you may, you will never win.
The Israeli Art Student | 02.11.06 - 11:55 pm | #