I'MMA LET YOU FINISH
frist
Now what?
Now what? Fuck Bush and fuck him hard.
Ahhh...
I just made my morning coffee.
Who remembers "Robey?" Briefly, Queen of Canadian scary TV shows.
George W. Bush
Are You Happy Bush Won? Vote & Win a Free Razr Phone
How old is that ad?
that weisman dude gets paid for what he writes?
our MSM is useless, they sell news and the news that sells is what they sell, not truth - that's for sure!
just because Cheney says it doesn't mean it's necessarily a lie ... well, maybe
By comparison, the three network news broadcasts spent more than 15 minutes that same night on the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation
But that gives them the opportunity to rerun little JonBenet's dance routines.
quoting the story: "But it's also remarkably popular among top Democrats and the establishment media, because they aren't all that eager to call any more attention to the fact that they were played for suckers."
We're all played for suckers.
We allowed Boosh to steal two elections. We're sheeple. A hundred thousand Iraqis are dead because Boosh thought Iraqis were sheeple-ized as much as americans.
Imagine if the U.S. were conquered, and we all had to pay 90% of our income in taxes to alleviate the suffering we have caused throughout the world.
We send bombs to Israel, Israel bombs Lebanon, and now we're going to be sending millions to rebuild Lebanon's infrastructure. Meanwhile, the 'enemy' Hezbollah is passing out wads of crisp new $100 bills.
Suitcases full of taxpayer-paid $100 bills are a great smart weapon. We gave them to Afghani warlords. Helped them kick-start their opium business. We gave them to Iraqi generals, who had likely been ordered to 'disband' (or more correctly, disperse) their troops and equipment anyway.
Sending in your IRS forms is like signing your own death warrant.
I loved this quote from Dan Froomkin in the post:
There is a popular sentiment among the Washington elite that what went wrong in the run-up to the war in Iraq has been sufficiently examined, and that it's all water under the bridge anyway.
It's popular in the White House and among Republicans for obvious reasons. But it's also remarkably popular among top Democrats and the establishment media, because they aren't all that eager to call any more attention to the fact that they were played for suckers.
There are, however, some people who believe that what led this country to launch a war of choice under false pretenses must be examined in detail -- over and over again if necessary -- until the appropriate lessons have been learned.
exactly right!!
Great article.
The Fairness Doctrine and the Equal Time Provisions of the federal communications code must be restored to their pre Reagan era deregulation status with modifications for private, pay cable and internet and old-fashioned over the air.
The telecomms will howl...Have you ever noticed how C-SPAN (a creature of cable owners) never touches the topic of telecommunication regulation?
the problem is that the flight 93 crash is a hoax to start with-- no plane crashed in that crater-- and this is something reporters just don't want to deal with at all.
What will we tell the children?
Dick Polman of the Inky nails it:
It always helps to remember the lesson of Senator Joe McCarthy. The 1950s demagogue, whose inaccurate red-baiting wrecked careers and drove people to suicide, was enabled at every step of the way by journalists who believed their job was to only report "what was said." McCarthy was a senator, therefore, if he said something (true or not), it was deemed news. When he made wild charges about 60 or 80 or 100 communists in the State Department, it was reported as news. The "fact" that he was making such charges was considered sufficient; as the New York Times wrote back then, after reviewing their own McCarthy coverage, "It is difficult, if not impossible, to ignore charges by Senator McCarthy just because they are usually proved false. The remedy lies with the reader."
Washington reporter Richard Rovere, in a book he wrote two years after the senator's death, complained about "the system that required (reporters) to publish 'news' they knew to be fraudulent but prohibited them from reporting their knowledge of its fradulence."
In today's world, given the credibility problems that have plagued administrations of both parties, that "system" is not adequate. Nor was it then.
Sometimes I wonder if journalists have actually heard of google. And if they have, why don't they use it?
And spooke, you're full of shit. I know people who were in the Pentagon when it was hit by the plane, I know people who saw it racing up I-395 en route to the Pentagon and I know people who actually saw it happen. These are people I know personally, these aren't friends of my third cousin once removed.
And yes, airplanes do disintegrate on impact and when that happens, bodies become nothing more than traces of DNA because they were consumed in the crash.
And BTW, why don't you allow comments on your blog? Are you afraid that someone might burst your bubble with overwhelming evidence to the contrary?
Characters Remaining:
Commenting by HaloScan
