HULK SMASH!!!
Lal!
me!!
Data's daughter, I mean.
Subpoenas. Marshalls. Jail.
Hey Wax Man, Smirk and Big Dick say fuck you.
March of the frogs. Please.
Thanks for the letter. I was running out of toilet paper.
/Dick
"These questions have implications for the credibility of the information coming from the battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan and raise significant policy issues about how to prevent the future dissemination of untrue information."
Seriously, is there a test on being a smarmy asshole in order to work for the Bush crime syndicate? Fielding is one of the worst offenders (along with Snow).
You know, when BushCheney do stuff like this, it makes you wonder if the real circumstances are worse than they already appear (which is very bad). I said to my dad last night that it makes me wonder if Pat Tillman was deliberately killed to make a hero--even though I am fully aware that is serious aluminum chapeau territory.
You just can't tell with this (mal)administration.
Sinfonian, since they never seem to have real credentials, my guess is that they had to come up with some sort of standard.
Thanks for the Constitution. I was running out of toilet paper.
/Dick
Bjorn,a poor young country boi
Fixed, etc.
bye for now 
Hecate, superbly said.
Bush just doesn't care. Seriously, what has he got to lose? He's headed for sub-Nixon approval ratings, he's not running for a second term, he doesn't care about other Republicans. He hates our Constitution, our system of government, the rule of law, and the American people. Why would he comply?
Waxman should consider sending anthrax in the letters.
Hecate, and God tells him not to comply.
Thank you, Sallyh! How's Maddie?
A quickie about Hillary/Johnjohn's comments...
Saw SiCKO yesterday. Even if you already know the problems of our health system, it's still worth seeing. It was funny, enraging, heartbreaking, beautiful. I hope enough people go to see it.
The Cuba segment was unbelievably poignant. Just saying.
Bush just doesn't care. Seriously, what has he got to lose? He's headed for sub-Nixon approval ratings, he's not running for a second term, he doesn't care about other Republicans. He hates our Constitution, our system of government, the rule of law, and the American people. Why would he comply?
Hecate, Runnymeade Conspirator | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 12:30 pm | #
Better question - why do Waxman, Conyers, et al bother with this endless stream of sternly worded letters? Really makes them look foolish at this point.
Hecate, and God tells him not to comply.
Oh, you're right. Isn't it odd how God never tells him to give away all his riches, heal the sick, feed the hungry, care for the widow and the orphan? God only tells him to do exactly what he already wanted to do anyway. It's amazing.
Oh, great. Another letter for the White House to ignore.
I'm waiting for the one that says, "we have the votes to support impeachment, and hearings will begin on (deadline date) if our requests for information are not met by the deadline."
Anything short of that, and Bush will continue waving his (tiny, flaccid) dick at them.
These things have nothing to do with Bush and everything to do with Republican culture. Since the Nixon days, the party has been dominated by people who hate America and who wish to supplant the government with some form of fascism, corporate or theocratic.
It is essential that the rethugs do not succeed in blaming Bush.
Welp, too chicken to give the Rooskies my Visa number, so I'll have to find a plan B.
V for Virginia | 07.14.07 - 12:24 pm |
Libraries, used,
http://www.mp3.com/artist/frank-...&
om_clk=arttabs
God only tells him to do exactly what he already wanted to do anyway.
God's an enabler.
Given the Republican *ahem*.. proclivities... why not send them Spanish Fly.
Real Spanish Fly.
"The main focus of the Committee’s investigation is to examine what the White House and the leadership of the Department of Defense knew about Corporal Tillman’s death and when they knew it. Unfortunately, the document production from the White House sheds virtually no light on these matters."
I'm gonna go way out on a limb and guess that this is not accidental.
Given the publicans apparent aversion to straight man/woman sex, how do they continue to multiply?
I agree the letters seem pointless, but a judge is going to want to see that they tried to work w/ the WH to get all the info before he enforces a subpoena. This kind of thing provides the paper trail. Prevents the WH from saying, "Why, if we'd known THAT was what they wanted, of course we'd have provided it for them."
They don't need no stinkin' judge if they impeach.
letters are for pussies at this point in the game, and the current gaggle of feckless dems fit the bill. Waxman, Convyers, Leahy and the rest of the majority party are not only a sickening joke, they are, by their inaction, working hand in hand with BushCo's raiding of our treasury, gutting of our government, ripping of our Constitution and obliterating freedom's future.
I agree the letters seem pointless, but a judge is going to want to see that they tried to work w/ the WH to get all the info before he enforces a subpoena. This kind of thing provides the paper trail. Prevents the WH from saying, "Why, if we'd known THAT was what they wanted, of course we'd have provided it for them."
zactly. You don't just impeach or whatever with nothing.
Ok, the garden beckons.
later, flittermice.
They don't need no stinkin' judge if they impeach.
They need the evidence so that they can impeach. Evidence provides the cover for moderate Republicans and, sadly, some Dems to vote for impeachment. They can do the "more in sorrow than anger" thing. "Faced with this mountain of evidence of illegal acts, I have no choice, but to vote for impeachment." They need the judge to help them get that evidence.
The dems asked on the pukes refused. What more do the dems need? The facts are clear at this point. Impeachment proceedings don't really require a paper trail as they are a political tool, not really a legal one. They really need to stop think in legal terms.
letters are for pussies at this point in the game, and the current gaggle of feckless dems fit the bill.
What do you propose, then?
letters are for pussies at this point in the game
What do you propose? I've offered to take to the streets w/ my pitchfork over and over. Short of that, there's a process and they've got to go through it.
buckeye -- thanks, wandering around over there.
Here, Zap, let me pour you a nice, cold Coke.
What do you propose, then?
Hey, that's MY line?
Um, impeachment proceeding might focus the mind. And I don't care that we "don't have the votes" right now.
What Hecate said.
And I believe both the Senate and the House have procedures they must follow in these matters. Frustrating for us, but necessary for them to do things properly.
Impeachment proceedings don't really require a paper trail as they are a political tool, not really a legal one. They really need to stop think in legal terms
They do need evidence for the moderates. The evidence gives the moderates cover. Also, an impeachment IS a trial. Trialsshouldnt be political
Digby had the right angle this week in the post about Dems failing to learn how to play extreme politics.
Letters and deadlines? I think the whole Alberto Gonzales poo fest shows they don't really take laws or traditional protocol very seriously.
Impeachment proceedings don't really require a paper trail as they are a political tool, not really a legal one. They really need to stop think in legal terms.
Then impeachment is a tainted tool, right?
By that rationale, impeachment is toothless, meaningless, and posturing.
It's a criminal trial; overseen by a judge and voted on by a "jury". By definition, it is a legal process. Unfortunately, it's now seen as something else because of the Clinton ordeal.
Subpoena with a short fuse then civil contempt or inherent contempt if absolute compliance does not follow. For what has already taken place immediately commence impeachment proceedings. Or you can write few more letters.
Wait. The dems asked for the Tillman docs and the pukes refused. Officially.
What is gained by writing back to Fielding at this point? Oh - we really meant it? Shit fuck and other curse words, this refusal is part of the record already.
And I don't care that we "don't have the votes" right now.
I don't want to deal w/ this junta after it survives an impeachment. It's already out of control.
Really, I get as frustrated w/ the Dems as it's possible to be, but you have to build a case, the same as any prosecutor. The Dems have been in "power" -- and it is tenuous, see, e.g., HoJo -- for 6 and a half months. That's not a lot of time.
Letter writing time has long passed. Isn't it time to take it to the courts with contempt charges? It might well be futile, but at least it's more action than continuing to write letters nobody reads.
I propose that the congress sue the executive branch.
Contempt is the kindest word one can use for the Bush crime syndicate. Time and again, they prove their belief that laws don't apply to them.
Here's another example, where the military is the gift that keeps on giving.
Its not just that I'm frustrated, the record is already clear. Either the dems pull the trigger or they don't.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
Tom Davis must be starting to realize that he does not get to stay in the House of Representatives forever just because he wants to stay there. Lots of military and civilian government workers in his district and I think that many of them are not very happy.
"An Indian minister has proposed
that all pregnant women register with the
government and seek its permission if they wish to undergo an abortion."
**********
For what has already taken place immediately commence impeachment proceedings. Or you can write few more letters.
Then fuck the legal process, right?
Letter writing time has long passed. Isn't it time to take it to the courts with contempt charges? It might well be futile, but at least it's more action than continuing to write letters nobody reads.
Then fuck the legal process, right?
Is what's being skated around here something to do with wingnut fundies infesting all branches of the US military, including the Rangers, and one of them murdered Tillman because he was some dort of gollum called an "atheist"?
Isn't it time to take it to the courts with contempt charges? It might well be futile, but at least it's more action than continuing to write letters nobody reads.
Well if what you want is action for the sake of action, that would work. However, there's an old saying: He who strikes a king must kill him. If the courts uphold this junta cuz the Dems haven't built their case, the boyking will be even more out of control and people who get ten minutes of news a day from CBS radio are going to hear, "The Dems didn't have a case and the president was vindicated." There's a cost to taking action and losing.
That said, I'm frustrted and well. People are dying, as is the planet, while this goes on.
What is gained by writing back to Fielding at this point? Oh - we really meant it? Shit fuck and other curse words, this refusal is part of the record already.
Mush as I hate the letters and the pooh poohing, on this matter, this executive privilege came out of the blue, and a letter was necessary. Who'da thunk the administration had something to hide in the Tillman case?
Impeachment proceedings don't really require a paper trail as they are a political tool, not really a legal one. They really need to stop think in legal terms.
Nope, sorry, because it is a political tool doesn't mean you throw documentation out the window. It's a Constitutional tool with legal trappings and must be above reproach, unlike how the GOP did it in the 90s. We can't trivialize it, or we nullify it as an important mechanism.
Impeachment will not instantly solve our problems, but fucking up will have huge ramifications long-term. Do it right.
OH, GOOD GAWD!
They're writing letters! As Bush, Cheney and Gonzales laugh their asses off!
.
Help me out here - is writing back to Fielding AFTER they have already refused the docs part of some required legal "process". So he can refuse again? Oh, I'm so sorry I ran over your dog, let me now back up over him?
here's what glenn has to say about it.
The only issue now for Congress is how they are going to force the confrontation we desperately need, and do it as aggressively and as quickly as possible. It is past the time for lawyer letters and pretty protest statements about government secrecy. Contempt orders and referrals for criminal prosecution are long overdue.
Is what's being skated around here something to do with wingnut fundies infesting all branches of the US military, including the Rangers, and one of them murdered Tillman because he was some dort of gollum called an "atheist"?
Could be.
If Congress steps up to impeachment and gets beaten down, what then?
I think I'm going to write another letter. I mean it ... I'm really indignant now!
Who'da thunk the administration had something to hide in the Tillman case?
Tillman's family.
This must be incredibly frustrating and difficult for them.
An aside: NTodd ... didja get my e-mail yesterday? I wrote to the "hill" addy.
Also, fuck you, you uncivil bastard. 
Help me out here - is writing back to Fielding AFTER they have already refused the docs part of some required legal "process". So he can refuse again?
Actually, it is. This kind of thing is pretty standard in all sorts of trials. Discovery procedures require it. If you want a judge to start enforcing subpoenas, aka send armed marshalls into the WH to shoot it out w/ the SS in order to seize hard drives, you have to lay down a paper trail that shows you tried to work it out w/o him. I guess that I'm just very used to this sorty of discovery procedure, even though it appears slow-moving and pointless if you're not used to it.
In politics, often the fight - and the impression that you're willing to fight - is more important than the short term "loss" .
If Congress steps up to impeachment and gets beaten down, what then?
When, in the course of human events . . ..
Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
Al Franken's old comedy partner?
An aside: NTodd ... didja get my e-mail yesterday? I wrote to the "hill" addy.
I didn't appear to, but with my move to the new laptop, my junk filters might be a little overaggressive now.
Can you resend and put WANKER in the subject?
What really tans my hide is that this is basically four administrations in a row that have tainted histories to them and five of the last six. This stuff has got to stop.
Can you resend and put WANKER in the subject?
NTodd, Bilker
Heh ... will do. Thanks.
Without even addressing Big Dick's role in outing an undercover CIA agent to cover up the lies that led us to war, the president expressly ordered witness under subpoena not to appear before Congress. Sounds like witness tampering and obstruction. What does that sound like to you, let me guess a sound expression of executive privilege. Highs crimes and misdemeanors abound well above and beyond lying about a fattie delivered White House blow job. Hell, the high crimes and misdemeanors that have been perpetrated by BushCo go well beyond breaking into the Watergate, as the NSA's warrantless wiretaps for all we know may involve breaking into millions of americans' communications without a warrant. Congress must take action beyond letter writing or remain cowering in fear and failure.
Nice touch, Hecate.
Freedom isn't just another word for nothing left to lose, anymore.
At the homepage, some plain folk.
Hecate, Runnymeade Conspirator | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 12:55 pm | #
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
Help me out here - is writing back to Fielding AFTER they have already refused the docs part of some required legal "process". So he can refuse again?
Well, they could be held in contempt of Congress. That's very serious (especially since Bush is claiming executive privilege for people that don't even belong to the executive branch anymore).
Look: we don't need to go all Bull Connor on this bit. That's why they write letters, issue subpoenas, etc. I'd like to think that we're above all of that...
What I'd really like to see is for Congress to do what it needs to do to build a case and for we, the people, to be the ones taking radical action to try and tip the balance. NTodd's blogged about a billion different ways that people -- us -- can take action to move the political process. It's not one or the other; it's not just let Waxman work through the discovery process vs. taking serious action. It can be both, working together synergystially, but that requires the people to act.
This Tillman case is a lot less esoteric than some of the other issues Dick is stonewalling. The "people" can probably get their brains around this one. And I'de love to see Kate O'40 grit defend this.
A good American kid got shot by friendly fire and now Dick wants to cover it up.
This is about as "good" as it gets as far as impeachment goes.
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
tbhull
Who the fuck are you, in your own mind?
What is gained by writing back to Fielding at this point?
Often parties are expected to exhaust compromise possibilities for seeking court orders. A judge is more likely to grant you your request when he is convinced there is no other way to resolve the conflict. That's a positive thing.
Neither party in Congress is truly interested in confronting Executive Privilege for fear of losing access to it when they have the presidency. So they try to work around it. But this administration is out of time and has no fear of losing in court. That Congress acts this way is nothing but a negative.
They have a remedy which is not dependent upon any court but their own. Sadly that court is evenly divided along party lines at the moment with one fucking independent vote who appears to have sworn allegiance to the Administration.
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
Fine, then. Grab you gun and storm the WH.
Look back and see how many folks are following you.
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
Fuck you, asshole.
NTodd has mail, and I have lunch.
Catch you patriotz laterz. Also, you might be interested to see how a reservist in America's Glans™ is resisting call-up ... by legal means (first time since Vietnam).
Bye for now ...
It's not one or the other; it's not just let Waxman work through the discovery process vs. taking serious action. It can be both, working together synergystially, but that requires the people to act.
Yes. Yes! YES!!!
That's exactly it: Congress has its role, and we have ours. We must look at this strategically, but people are getting lost in the tactical weeds.
This is about as "good" as it gets as far as impeachment goes
I think you may very well be right. It has an emotional appeal to a lot of otherwise not too lefy Americans.
(looks kinda funnel-cloudy out there)
Neither party in Congress is truly interested in confronting Executive Privilege for fear of losing access to it when they have the presidency
Recent history has shown that Executive Privilege is antiquated and dangerous. I think there may need to be some serious rethinking of that clause.
Sorry to hijack the thread, but this story is too outrageous to ignore.
"Republican State Rep. Exposed Himself to Female Employee, Chased Her Screaming, "Suck It"
This is about as "good" as it gets as far as impeachment goes
I think you may very well be right.
At least, short of a blowjob.
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
You think people aren't dying during "normal" trials? Whatever a "normal" trial is. You think we sit in Ivory Towers discussing the esoteric nature of the law without regard for the real impact cases have on lives?
now that the trickle down theory has run its' course, hopefully the bubble up phenomenom of the internet will become strong enough to change the debate in this country... finally.
This is not a normal trial. People are dying as letters are written. Get back to westlaw and the law library.
And what are you doing to stop the dying?
Zap Rowsdower, Homebody | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:01 pm | #
This is not a case for gun, but this is not a case for a civil discovery normally found in a bland meaningless civil actions that take place day after day in small and large towns across our country and attempts to compare the impeachment proceeding to the day to day workings of pedestrian lawyers is worthless.
Sinf has mail back, motherfucker.
V for Virginia, we can see blue sky here for a change. In Austin, therealhellkitty tells me the trees are falling over, it's so soggy. Sad.
And Thursday's bird was something I saw in Garden of the Gods, CO, a prairie falcon. Nice.
Hesiod, we need you! Start blogging again!
"Republican State Rep. Exposed Himself to Female Employee, Chased Her Screaming, "Suck It"
Power corrupts.
Humans need to stat thinking of a new way to govern.
What idiot would not be nice to Hecate?
This is not a case for gun, but this is not a case for a civil discovery normally found in a bland meaningless civil actions that take place day after day in small and large towns across our country and attempts to compare the impeachment proceeding to the day to day workings of pedestrian lawyers is worthless.
Uh...we need to have discovery lest we not get a conviction in the Senate. Do it half-assed, and you've destroyed the whole purpose of impeachment in this instance, as well in the general sense as a check.
You don't build a house without a foundation, and you don't impeach without at least some semblance of a case. Hell, even the GOP tried to build a house of cards with a foundation...
NTodd, Bilker | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:04 pm | #
Work to have Congress remove the cancer that led us into this disaster and that will not cease in continuing the same. Money works well. If Congress refuses to act, then the options shrink.
I think there may need to be some serious rethinking of that clause.
It isn't a clause. You will find it no where in the Constitution. You want it to change, you got an election coming up in less than 16 months. It is time for people to get involved, for real, in the political process. Tell your politicians what you expect and then demand it from them. Organize your group, whatever that might be, and become a political force.
Kucinich: Clinton, Edwards are rigging the '08 election RAW STORY
Published: Friday July 13, 2007
It is a "conspiracy to rig the presidential election," says angered Democratic presidential contender and Congressman Dennis Kucinich, after hearing a verbal exchange between Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John Edwards suggesting that future debates should include fewer candidates.
Says Kucinich, "[I]n a democracy people get exposed to ideas and they make the decision for themselves."
TOO BAD MOTHERFUCKER. WRONG COUNTRY. WRONG 'PROGRESSIVE' MOVEMENT.
POWER SPEAKS TO MONEY NOT JUSTICE.
"Republican State Rep. Exposed Himself to Female Employee, Chased Her Screaming, "Suck It"
They're all fucking perverts, aren't they?
In true Republican fashion Almond was the vice chairman of the House committee on children, youth and families.
NTodd, Bilker | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:07 pm | #
The first step is to file the case. Discovery will follow.
Suck it, baby! Suck it!
When will the Tom Hagen of the Bush Crime family be brought to justice?
Work to have Congress remove the cancer that led us into this disaster and that will not cease in continuing the same. Money works well. If Congress refuses to act, then the options shrink.
You aren't really making sense, Cancer Boy.
i say give the GOP as much rope as they want till '08...they have shown that the only thing they see rope for is hanging themselves...let W do a couple more of those rambling and nonsensical press conferences...let the R's in the senate keep being against the anti-war resolutions...their ratings can only keep going down
clinton/obama landslide in '08!
I am not a lawyer (and do not play one on tv), but IIRC otherwise priviledged communication (between lawyer/client, etc) loses its priviledge when it can be shown that the communication was in furtherance of the commission of a crime. That's why you write letters and try to get a judge to enforce subpoenas to get the evidence to blow the whole thing wide open. Frustrating, but it takes time.
Kucinich has limited political skills and no understanding of how the political theatre works. Otherwise, he'd be discussing how to cut Edwards out of the race with Clinton.
I'm hoping that actual impeachment proceedings will uncover a lot more shit. It may sort of negate some of Dick's ability to stonewall.
Bjorn, a simple question for you.
Do you want:
A: Bush, Cheney, et al, impeached, tried in the Senate, convicted, removed from office and possibly even imprisoned?
or
B:Bush, Cheney, et al, impeached, tried in the Senate, accquited and the GOP regenerated and potentially given enough of a bump to take back the Senate and possibly even the House?
If your answer is A, then let the process work, let the evidence be compiled, let the experts like Lehey and Waxman do their jobs.
Of course, if you really prefer B, well, more power to you, but consider the consequences.
(From Hesiod's link):
In true Republican fashion Almond was the vice chairman of the House committee on children, youth and families.
I was somewhat disappointed that our FL state rep from Merritt Island who got busted for offering to pay a cop $20 to blow him (that is, the rep wanted to blow the cop) wasn't much of a nutcase. I prefer for them to be consistently, insanely, blatantly hypocritical whenever possible.
(Local city council person and her husband were just charged with domestic assault and false imprisonment after an attempted exorcism of their 18 y.o. daughter, complete with covering her in olive oil. But that's just loony.)
Kucinich has limited political skills and no understanding of how the political theatre works. Otherwise, he'd be discussing how to cut Edwards out of the race with Clinton.
rootless2, tumbling
mm hm
Good afternoon, folks!
Few things more disgusting than hearing serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer pontificate about how "belief in evolution cheapens life."
Oh, please!
and attempts to compare the impeachment proceeding to the day to day workings of pedestrian lawyers is worthless.
Well, did you see what a fucking joke the last impeachment proceeding turned out to be?
Regardless, it still requires a process. As Hecate and NTodd have pointed out, the pols have their roll, and we have ours. And, yes, while whining is one of the rolls that we fill, trying to convince politicians to ignore the legal process because we're fed up is not a roll that we're prepared to play...in any way, shape, or form.
We have not even come close to exhausting everything at our disposal. And while we are impatient, we have to accept the fact that our representatives our going to go about this the way that it's laid out to them in our fucking constitution.
Of course, if you really prefer B, well, more power to you, but consider the consequences.
Chris Tucker
I have a Plan C but it would get me banned from here and in trouble in other quarters.
The first step is to file the case. Discovery will follow.
Not exactly. There are many strands to this, and they're gathering a record to create the indictment.
I said...SUCK IT, BABY!
V for Virginia, we can see blue sky here for a change.
Noice! I have to check the Thursday post. Thursday's a bad day for me, what with the hours on the road and the work-related activities.
We are really having a spectacular light show over the ocean!
How about "C", I'm willing to risk that the law of unintended consequences bites them more than us.
Kucinich has limited political skills and no understanding of how the political theatre works. Otherwise, he'd be discussing how to cut Edwards out of the race with Clinton.
Oh, I think he has an idea of how the theatre works. He's slamming them for doing what they need to do, and that's just what he needs to do. It's all good.
A good American kid got shot by friendly fire and now Dick wants to cover it up.
The litany of lies told in the Tillman case is every bit as lengthy and sordid as those told in the Plame incident, or in the entire "Let's sell Iraq to the peasants like you sell laundry detergent" thing.
Given the publicans apparent aversion to straight man/woman sex, how do they continue to multiply?
Bjorn,a poor young country boi |
Er, stupidity?
It isn't a clause. You will find it no where in the Constitution.
Executive privilege is not constitutionally authorized? How is it that presidents have this power then?
Zap Rowsdower, Homebody | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:11 pm | #
Do you not think evidence exists that the president nd/or VP have committed high crimes and misdemeanors? Last time I checked, the impeachment provision did not have a discovery period or any other condition precedent. Sounds like you would like the clock to run out.
What idiot would not be nice to Hecate?
Culture of TrÜth
A misguided one.
Light shows here have been about one a day the last few weeks, VA. But this time last year we had 11 days over 100F, so I will take this, thk yew.
Executive privilege is not constitutionally authorized? How is it that presidents have this power then?
smalfish,teetering | 07.14.07 - 1:13 pm | #
Total concentration.
Okay, it's too hot to do the much-walking, busing thang. I will instead illegally scoot to Sahib's for beer, Aldi for groceries, and spend the evening with you good folx.
.
I said...SUCK IT, BABY!
NC State Rep. David Almond
As with all Repugs, it'd take an electron microscope to find it.
(Besides, I've seen this guy's photo - yuk!)
JP -- why illegal?
Oh, I think he has an idea of how the theatre works. He's slamming them for doing what they need to do, and that's just what he needs to do. It's all good.
NTodd, Bilker | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:12 pm | #
sometimes n todd you say very insightful things.
most of the time though i just want to spraypaint your bicycle with granite speckle
It's like BoBo's world is off its meds!
And, of course, share kizzats with ya, too.
.
Just took the boy to the Tastee Freez.
Yes, we had Chili dogs.
V for Virginia: JP -- why illegal?
I owe the Davidson County Court $1255, and perhaps a couple of days in jail!
.
I'm hoping that actual impeachment proceedings will uncover a lot more shit.
You gotta have the shit before impeachment.
Remember -- Nixon was not impeached. The hearings were all pre-impeachment discovery. Nixon resigned when he was forced to realize they had uncovered enough shit to impeach him and make it stick.
Do you not think evidence exists that the president nd/or VP have committed high crimes and misdemeanors?
Not on record.
Last time I checked, the impeachment provision did not have a discovery period or any other condition precedent.
It has no conditions, so Congress can do this any way they want. That would include getting the baddies on record to improve chances of convinction.
Sounds like you would like the clock to run out.
Hello, Mister Strawman. Don't mischaracterize what people here intend, dickface.
I owe the Davidson County Court $1255, and perhaps a couple of days in jail!
.
Jeffraham Prestonian
Oh, hell, no! What have you DONE????
Impeachment may not get started soon, but how about putting away for being a danger to one's self and/or others? I'm thinking that would be ideal.
Edwards has a point, though...these 10 candidate panel things suck, for both parties.
Limiting the debates to three or four at random would be better for actually gleaning information on the candidates. Otherwise you hear more of that fucking twit Tweety than you do of the candidates, which serously sucks we get too much of that fuckting twit Tweety as it is.
Jeffraham, they is pretty kizzats, and they can haz cheezburger
V for Virginia: Oh, hell, no! What have you DONE????
Cited twice in late 2005 for driving w/o insurance, expired tags, and missed the court dates.
.
Hell, even the GOP tried to build a house of cards with a foundation...
The Republicans did discovery on Clinton for years and I guarandamntee you they were writing these kinds of letters to back up their requests to the judge to enforce subpoenas. They built their case until they could depo Clinton and get him to lie about sex w/ Lewinsky which they then alleged was perjury since he was under oath.
The evidence that Waxman et al. are trying to get is necessary in order to get enough votes. People like Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson and Olympia Snowe need it for cover, if not to actually convince them. If we had a huge majority, it might be a different story, but you go to impeachment with the Congress you've got, not the one that you wish that you had.
There are two ways to get this junta out. We can take to the streets. Some of us will die, but if there are enough of us out there, we could still win. I've said a hundred times that I have a pitchfork and I'm ready to go. As a pedestrian, westlaw-researching, law-library-dwelling lawyer, I believe that the people have a legal right to throw this junta out and that such an action would be morally justified.
Or, we can all stay home and watch tv and bitch on blogs and occasionally call our Congress critters and let them go through the frustrating legal process.
NTodd and I have proposed a third way and no one is interested.
Do you not think evidence exists that the president nd/or VP have committed high crimes and misdemeanors? Last time I checked, the impeachment provision did not have a discovery period or any other condition precedent. Sounds like you would like the clock to run out.
Yeah, there's nothing I'd like more than to have that blathering idiot spend one more second in the WH.
*sigh*
You're arguing something that has nothing to do with the legal process. WE'RE ABOVE all that nonsense, I'd like to think. And we're holding the pol's feet to the fire (look at Congress' approval ratings now) because we want an end to all of this madness.
Americans have turned impatience into a glorified art form. We need to stop that mentality.
Executive privilege is not constitutionally authorized? How is it that presidents have this power then?
You've heard about that activist judging? They have assumed it exists because of the separation of powers doctrine. The executive gets to decide how to enforce the laws, so executives have tried to conclude that Congress has no right to ask them how they reached their decisions. The first one to do so was, well, the very first one.
Jeffraham, have you called them about making payment arrangements?
I don't know about TN, but in LA County, it's done all the time.
Jeffraham, they is pretty kizzats, and they can haz cheezburger
Sallyh for Hussein, Grandmere
I keep waiting for JP to post the photo I can LOL (with permission, natch). I know that's where it's gonna come from.
Im sure senator clinton will voluntarily sit out the next few debates so cong. kuchinich can explain
a.
his propeace proposals
b.
his silly photo of mother teresa
c.
whether his wife really likes 'bangers and mash.' eh, eh?
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ Sallyh! ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
Where have I been?
.
In true Republican fashion Almond was the vice chairman of the House committee on children, youth and families.
The really insane thing is, when I bring this kind of stuff to the wingnut wife, she's ALWAYS of the mind that it's just one person. She fails to see the pattern of abuse of power and inherent corruption. And when I make the point clearer, she resorts to the fact that democrats have done the same things. My retort is that I realise that, but you don't want better ethics? She then just blows it off as saying there's nothing to be done and she seem happy with the status quo.
Hecate, I am paying close attention to what you and NTodd propose.
Cited twice in late 2005 for driving w/o insurance, expired tags, and missed the court dates.
.
Jeffraham Prestonian
Oh, good, nothing new :>)
Jeffraham, I don't knows. Where has you been?
Tell, Me Atrios. If I had a blog, and I wanted to hire you to clean it up -- How much would it cost?
Otherwise you hear more of that fucking twit Tweety than you do of the candidates, which serously sucks we get too much of that fuckting twit Tweety as it is.
Apprentice to Darth Holden
Hey!
Sallyh: Jeffraham, have you called them about making payment arrangements?
Yes, I can do that, but it involves going before the court, at which time I may be unceremoniously put in the cooler. I'd like to avoid that, if possible. Looks like I will have to hire an attorney if I want certainty as to staying out of jail.
.
NTodd, Bilker | Homepage | 07.14.07 - 1:18 pm | #
Oh man/woman of many words and thoughts, how much info will Congress on the record when executive privilege is exerted at every turn even to the point of ordering a witness under subpoena not to testify? Do you think any additional information will be obtained from the administration? What would you do with what Congress has currently? Nothing? Whispers are that impeachment may be brought on obstructions charges. I think dick face is two words.
Jeffraham, what about Legal Aid? Or go to one of the do it yourself doc places. Anything's better than Bubba as your roommate.
hecate... what is this other way that you speak of with NTodd???
sometimes n todd you say very insightful things.
most of the time though i just want to spraypaint your bicycle with granite speckle
A sentiment I can get in front of.
Sallyh: Jeffraham, what about Legal Aid? Or go to one of the do it yourself doc places. Anything's better than Bubba as your roommate.
Well, I only have the advice thusfar of an ex-Metro cop and a guy who's had four DUIs. They both advise an attorney, who can probably work out a deal that will keep me out of jail for failure to appear.
.
sometimes n todd you say very insightful things.
most of the time though i just want to spraypaint your bicycle with granite speckle
Would you settle for a time out?
JP, have you tho't about going to a free legal clinic and talking this over? You may get some guidance that will keep you out of jail.
Sallyh for Hussein, Grandmere | 07.14.07 - 1:21 pm | #
More letters, discovery requests, memos, TPS reports, etc...
Last time I checked, the impeachment provision did not have a discovery period or any other condition precedent.
One house votes to impeach. Clinton was impeached. The other house holds a trial. Clinton didn't have to leave office because the Republicans couldn't convinve enough members of that house that he was guilty.
In order to convince moderates in either house to vote the way that we want, we're going to have to show them evidence.
Here's an idea. One of the people who I think is working the hardest to get Bush impeched is Freeway Blogger. He puts signs up everywhere that say "Impeach." Imagine how much bolder Congress would be if, over this weekend, hundreds of "Impeach" signs went up all over America. I've got one in my yard right now. How about if, instead of bitching on a blog, everyone of us goes out and puts up five "Impeach" signs this weekend? I'm certainly willing to do that. Who else will?
Hecate, the FBs are certainly busy in L.A. I've seen the banners all over the place.
Anything's better than Bubba as your roommate.
Does he smell good?
JP, have you tho't about going to a free legal clinic and talking this over? You may get some guidance that will keep you out of jail.
Two tickets for no insurance and failure to appear is more dangerous and uncivil than outting a CIA agent. He MUST do the time!
Ruth: JP, have you tho't about going to a free legal clinic and talking this over? You may get some guidance that will keep you out of jail.
No; they were no help to me when this was all fresh -- would not return my calls or e-mails, and I didn't have any income at that time. Now, I couldn't possibly qualify. So, I pay. It'll be cheaper than taking days off work to sit in a free legal aid office, anyway.
.
JP,
Call legal aid. Call your local law school and ask if they have a clinic program that represents people. Call the biggest law firms in your area and ask how to get your name on their pro bono list. Do it Monday.
tbhull, the time out's for NTodd.
Try to keep up
i'm in...
Does he smell good?
Chris Matthews
Actually, you might think so! Pretty damn masculine, I'm guessing. At least.
Jeffraham, the goddess Hecate, one of our gifted legal eagles, has spoken. Do not disobey her.
sometimes n todd you say very insightful things.
I try not to.
most of the time though i just want to spraypaint your bicycle with granite speckle
I have that effect on people. It's all part of my charm.
Would you settle for a time out?
NTodd prefers the timeouts that include paddling.
fokowi is in. Betwen the two of us, that's ten "Impeach" signs going up in America this weekend. Anyone else want in on the fun?
Smalfish, he prefers his paddling from Rorschach, though.
Oh man/woman of many words and thoughts, how much info will Congress on the record when executive privilege is exerted at every turn even to the point of ordering a witness under subpoena not to testify?
Now you've got them on record defying the will of Congress.
I think dick face is two words.
Wrong, fuckwit.
Hecate,
I just placed a 4' x 4' sign in my front window that says "Impeach. Indict. Imprison. Bush."
I live on a busy intersection.
Just wanted you to know I care.
I have that effect on people. It's all part of my charm.
Of course, "charm", being loosely defined....
Hecate, does the "Impeach the Bastards" sign on our street lawn count, along with the bumperstickers?
Of course, "charm", being loosely defined....
I have to define it loosely, otherwise I won't be able to use the word. Kinda like Bush does...
smalfish, we just had a fella sentenced to 11 years in jail for failing to report his change of address for 11 days, a convicted sexual predator. I suspect that might qualify as excessive.
Hecate, good idea.
Hey Jeffraham, doesn't Vandy have a law school?
JP
They can do this over the phone and fax (may need to see any docs you've got). Seriously, your best bet might be the fanciest law firm in town. They all do pro bono, have to, and your case is a simple, easy one. Those are the kind they love.
JP -
Your current employer is, as I recall a university? Their law school will be able to provide legal aid of some kind, or, your human resources department may well have connexions with lawyers for their employees.
I have to define it loosely, otherwise I won't be able to use the word. Kinda like Bush does...
NTodd writes for Websters!!
Hecate, does the "Impeach the Bastards" sign on our street lawn count, along with the bumperstickers?
Definitely! I love it.
Oversight Committee Objects to Withholding of Tillman Documents
What are they hiding? Did someone find out that Tillman was a DemocRAT?
Watching the Ken Burns documentary on the Civil War. Didn't know Jefferson Davis was a US Senator.
Those are the kind they love.
Particularly if you don't want to meet with them.
smalfish, we just had a fella sentenced to 11 years in jail for failing to report his change of address for 11 days, a convicted sexual predator. I suspect that might qualify as excessive.
Those sex offender laws just mystify me. In some cases I can't agree more, and in others I'm all like WTF!.
Hecate, we get a lot of honks and thumbs up. There are a few others in the neighborhood, a couple in Spanish.
JP -- you could always claim Executive Priviledge.
In local news, shockingly, sense prevails:
Upside down flag draws ire, possible fines from HOA
WHEAT RIDGE, Colo.—A woman on Friday won her free speech battle with her homeowners' association and will be allowed to display the American flag upside down outside her home in this west Denver suburb. Retired banker Beth Hammer hung the flag the upside-down on March 19, the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, in protest of the war.
Hanging the flag with the blue field and white stars on the bottom is considered a sign of distress under the federal flag code and has drawn the ire of some in her community and the homeowners' association. In a statement, the Cambridge Park Homeowners Association said it would not pursue enforcement under its "patriotic and political expression policy" because: "The financial and other resource costs to the Association outweigh any harmful impact this violation may have."
The association also said its members still believe Hammer violated the federal flag code and the HOA's issue on how to display a flag had not been settled. The federal flag code states: "The flag should never be displayed with union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property."
The HOA held a hearing on the issue Wednesday. Beth Hammer and her husband, Doug, faced fines of up to $500 per violation which could be applied retroactively to the date the flag was hung. Hammer's lawyer, Mari Newman, said the five-member board wouldn't allow her to present evidence of other residents who were violating HOA rules on flags but who were never cited.
Does anyone know Tennessee's rules for law students practicin' in court?
Sallyh: Hey Jeffraham, doesn't Vandy have a law school?
A right good one, yes. Not sure how I feel about letting the employers know of my troubles with the justice system, however...
Hecate: They can do this over the phone and fax (may need to see any docs you've got). Seriously, your best bet might be the fanciest law firm in town. They all do pro bono, have to, and your case is a simple, easy one. Those are the kind they love.
Yeah, but this is all my fault, and I do have a job, now, and can afford to pay for my fuck-ups. I'd hope these other folx are saving the free work for people who are in real trouble.
.
Hecate,
I'll get a sign for the new Casa de Rowsdower.
/thumbs through overreaching St. Paul zoning codes
One thing Monsieur, Mlle, SIL and I do is keep a stash of bumper stickers on hand, as people tend to ask us where we got ours. We finally decided to buy up a bunch (good discounts at CafePress for bulk buys), and when someone asks where we got it, we ask them if they want one. We were only turned down once by a young woman who said her employer would fire her for having her car sport one.
The refusal of the Bush Administration to release the Tillman documents is an issue that Democrats should be screaming about. Although the Administration is arguing that its decision to withhold the Tillman documents is based on the same principle of executive privilege as is being used in resisting Congressional efforts to get to the bottom of the US Attorney dismissals, the issue can be much more simply framed by the Democrats as a White House standing in the way of the efforts of an American family to get to the bottom of why the government lied to them about the circumstances of their son's death.
I can only hope that Pat Tillman's brother or mother issues a strong statement making that point - - viz, Why is George Bush keeping the truth from us? Why can't we be given the full truth about the circumstances of Pat's death, and the stories and cover-up that followed?
Jeffraham, you're hardly the first. They see crap like this all the time. It's not going to reflect on you in any way.
NTodd and I have proposed a third way and no one is interested.
To be fair, we haven't proposed a fourth or fifth way.
And we can't ask people what they would do, because then they get very upset...
hecate... what is this other way that you speak of with NTodd???
NTodd doesn't have a blog, but if he did and it were called Pax Americana, he'd have blogged billions of ideas for people to take action.
As I noted above, this should be just about what Congress does. We, the people, should be taking action that pushes Congress, provides them political cover, lets them know that we're serious. We should also be getting others to do the same.
Putting up five "Impeach" signs is one way. NTodd's nonexistent blog lists literally tons of others.
the federal flag code
Don't make me laugh...
Ahem: For more information, contact the Vanderbilt University Law School Legal Clinic at 615-322-4964.
And Jeffraham, if you do NOT do as The Goddess instructs...let's just say goddesses don't like their good advice defied
Waxman and Davis write to Fred Fielding.
Lanny Davis also wrote to Fielding- "I worship you, man!".
having owned an outdoor advertising company a few years back, one of the rules of getting the 'message across' was that people driving by at 70 mph can only grasp 6 - 7 words. i like the one word approach. impeach.
in fact, i may still have some space available on a few of the billboards that i sold.
hmm.
one word says it all. no need to clutter up the signs with anymore than 'impeach'.
however, the effect needs to be bolstered by thousands of these signs. no matter how big or small they are. street/alleys/everywhere.
"The flag should never be displayed with union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property."
Uh . . . yeah.
Yeah, but this is all my fault, and I do have a job, now, and can afford to pay for my fuck-ups. I'd hope these other folx are saving the free work for people who are in real trouble.
You'll be alright as long as you can stay away from the law until you get the funds you need. You have stopped driving, right?
I agree impeachment is needed to preserve the democracy against a possible competent future administration that will take what digsby called the "tools" the junta leaves behind establish to authoritarian rule. But I just don't see enough GOP Senate support -- leaving aside Lieberman -- to make it happen. Christ, they can't even move away from torture or Iraq.
What would be a reasonable impeachment timeline? I can't see the process going forward after the conventions next summer.
The association also said its members still believe Hammer violated the federal flag code
Would that be the federal flag code that prohibits wearing the flag as a garment or printing the image of the flag on something intended to be soiled and discarded in the trash . . . like a napkin?
Sallyh: Jeffraham, you're hardly the first. They see crap like this all the time. It's not going to reflect on you in any way.
I agree -- it's not like a capital crime. But then again, it's a private institution, and I'm a complete non-entity w/no benefits or contract, so...
.
Does anyone know Tennessee's rules for law students practicin' in court?
I don't, but most states have a provision that lets them do so in things like law school clinics where they are supervised by licensed atty's. It's good experience for the students and helps folks like Jeff.
I think I've figured out where I can put three "Impeach" signs. I'll have to paint fabric because we're getting rain every day now.
What is it the congress is looking for from the white house re: Tillman?
Jeffraham, just do it. I'm calling you Monday to make sure you do it.
that is all.
For the love of Chuy, JP, what on earth do you suppose the little baby lawyers at Vanderbilt would do in their legal clinic which is dedicated to training them to work with real clients in real life situations if people like you didn't volunteer to practiced on?
Oh, and Jeffraham? At UCLA, the most common thing dealt with in the clinics, other than DV, are DUIs.
I don't think what you've done is anywhere nearly as emotionally loaded.
I don't, but most states have a provision that lets them do so in things like law school clinics where they are supervised by licensed atty's. It's good experience for the students and helps folks like Jeff.
Exactly. Call that number and get some law student to do the grunt work. You'll be helping a future lawyer and every one of their future clients.
however, the effect needs to be bolstered by thousands of these signs. no matter how big or small they are. street/alleys/everywhere.
Somebody in DC takes wide masking tape and writes "Bush terrifies me" and puts those all over near stop signs, etc. Not big at all, difficult for the cops to get rid of, and you see them when you're sitting at the light.
GWPDA: For the love of Chuy, JP, what on earth do you suppose the little baby lawyers at Vanderbilt would do in their legal clinic which is dedicated to training them to work with real clients in real life situations if people like you didn't volunteer to practiced on?
Well, maybe I'm silly, but I'm sure at some point I was asked to sign something that said I had not been convicted of a crime, etc., or to explain if I HAD been. That may be enough to get me fired, I would think, should this all come out to them.
.
The baby lawyers need your help, JP!
Would that be the federal flag code that prohibits wearing the flag as a garment or printing the image of the flag on something intended to be soiled and discarded in the trash . . . like a napkin?
That's the one. In earlier articles they mentioned that other people in the neighborhood had flags that were soiled, stuck in flowerpots, etc. But since they were stars up, no one minded. Of course, these are the same types of HOAs that mandate people grow water-guzzling non-native grasses and keep them trimmed to within an inch of their lives.
think I've figured out where I can put three "Impeach" signs. I'll have to paint fabric because we're getting rain every day now.
You rock. Thanks!
That may be enough to get me fired, I would think, should this all come out to them.
Who is going to tell? Not your lawyer. We can't do things like that.
Oh, thanks for mention tape, Hecate. I was trying to figure out what to make my Impeach signs out of. I've got duct tape just sitting there waiting.
Somebody in DC takes wide masking tape and writes "Bush terrifies me" and puts those all over near stop signs, etc.
Ohhh, that's brilliant. Could be done everywhere and very quickly. I'm envisioning "Impeach" vertically on all sorts of signage around town.
Best. Soap. Ever.
I was all ready to say something if that didn't link to Dr Bronner.
I don't think what you've done is anywhere nearly as emotionally loaded.
When I was very young and stupid I got into almost the exact problems JP is faced with. I ignored it for years. When they finally caught up with me, it kinda just blew apart. I did some community service, paid some fines and probation and it was over.
Who is going to tell? Not your lawyer. We can't do things like that.
Snow, Dirty | 07.14.07 - 1:43 pm | #
As long as the bills get paid.
The baby lawyers need your help, JP!
Snow, Dirty
Will no one think of the children?
What are they hiding in the Tillman case?
I would guess a White House directed effort to cash in on his death for propaganda purposes and then an attempt to cover up how he really died.
Entirely consistent with the junta's MO.
Well, maybe I'm silly, but I'm sure at some point I was asked to sign something that said I had not been convicted of a crime, etc.,
Even for a traffic violation?
Saw the Dr. Bronner movie on the other day. Interesting.
Snow: Who is going to tell? Not your lawyer. We can't do things like that.
I'm thinking if I went to their legal aid clinic, it would not be just attorneys who would know of my visits there, and it's a gossipy place (or at least MY part of it is) to begin with.
.
As long as the bills get paid.
Uh . . . no.
(Just idly wondering if the people standing on the balcony of their vacation rental condo next door would be interested to know that the building has been hit by lightning three times in the past 2 years.)
yes.... all of the duct tape that we were instructed to buy to seal up our doors in case of an 'attack' will now finally have some real fucking purpose... use duct tape everyone.
Could be done everywhere and very quickly. I'm envisioning "Impeach" vertically on all sorts of signage around town.
Exactly. And, on newpaper boxes. Gas pumps. Soda machines. Laundromats. Public phones. Etc.
Jeffraham, I believe even TN has something called attorney-client privilege.
Of course, these are the same types of HOAs that mandate people grow water-guzzling non-native grasses and keep them trimmed to within an inch of their lives.
{Raises hand]
Culture of TrÜth: Even for a traffic violation?
From what I gather, driving w/o insurance in TN is a Class C felony.
.
I would guess a White House directed effort to cash in on his death for propaganda purposes and then an attempt to cover up how he really died.
Entirely consistent with the junta's MO.
If they didn't do that, I will be embarassed for Karl Rove.
I'm thinking if I went to their legal aid clinic, it would not be just attorneys who would know of my visits there
Stop making excuses why you can't follow the advice you've been given. If you go to jail, I am pretty sure they will find out about that.
L8t, Bats. I've printed my five signs and I'm off to spread them around NoVa.
Jeffraham, universities are gossipy by their very nature, but most of it stays within departments. And yes, we've had a couple members of our faculty be charged with DUIs. They're still working.
JP - the form you may have been asked to sign routinely says everything -except- traffic. Don't worry about it. And remember that nobody is paying any attention to you at all - who you visit on your lunch hour is your business. Not even the gossipy little receptionist would dare share any kind of information about who visits whom during legal clinic because she would lose her job. Just call 'em up and make the appointment and take care of it. Chickens always come home to roost if you don't.
.
that whole insurance thing
"Yeah, but this is all my fault, and I do have a job, now, and can afford to pay for my fuck-ups."
If you can afford to pay the fine, then what's the problem?
If they didn't do that, I will be embarassed for Karl Rove.
Culture of TrÜth
Not to worry; that's precisely what they did.
okay, gotta go dig out some duct tape. l8r
From what I gather, driving w/o insurance in TN is a Class C felony.
Oh fuck.
You do need a lawyer.
I was all ready to say something if that didn't link to Dr Bronner.
I've been trying to remember his name all week (want to use that stuff to clean the house). Then NPR does a story on him. Eerie.
something that said I had not been convicted of a crime, etc.,
When they ask such things, they are talking about felony convictions -- not misdemeanors.
Snow: Stop making excuses why you can't follow the advice you've been given. If you go to jail, I am pretty sure they will find out about that.
I'm not making excuses. I'm saying my better move is to hire an attorney that has no connection to my workplace. I'm not going to jail, unless I am stupid -- they don't come looking for people who miss traffic court, but they do routinely jail them if they're caught driving.
.
CoT, I would love for you to have listened in on my conversations with Blue Cross this past week. You could have had fun with that
that whole insurance thing
Culture of TrÜth
Could be solved with pay-at-the-pump systems.
Jeffraham, I bet Gnashvegas has more than one law school
Sundance showed a long documentary about Bronner last week. Caught it accidentally after the Global warming concert. I had never heard of him til the movie came on.
inspirited lurker: If you can afford to pay the fine, then what's the problem?
Because I don't KNOW for a fact that settles matters. That's why I need an attorney.
.
RE: IMPEACH signage.
Computer + Printer + Avery labels.
IMPEACH stickers EVERYWHERE! Payphones, newspaper boxes, stairway handrails, escalator handrails, et al, etc.
Easy to carry, easy to discretely affix.
Now, I KNOW each and every one of you has a computer...!
Fresh owls
Jeffraham, now there's an easy question.
Ask the baby lawyers if that's the case. If it is, pay it, and forget about it.
If it's not, ask the baby lawyers to help you out.
You could have had fun with that
Sallyh for Hussein, Grandmere
I'm going to expand my empire to cover tv, radio, sitcoms, theatre and converations wth the borg!!
Computer + Printer + Avery labels.
Define "Avery labels".
Define "Avery labels".
Available at any office supply store. They format into Microsoft Word for mailing labels.
Avery labels are the standard adhesive label.
Get 'em at Staples, Office Depot, etc.
If you can't find a freeware/cheap shareware program that'll print out text on a sheet of Avery labels, you're a lazy bastard and will be turned away from behind the Tasty Freeze!
"I'm wearing my Federalist Society underoos, I don't have to listen to you"-Fred Fielding
"Better question - why do Waxman, Conyers, et al bother with this endless stream of sternly worded letters? Really makes them look foolish at this point."
Bjorn,a poor young country boi
-If they want to set the stage for Chimpeachment, the paper trail could be useful (you'll notice I said "If").
Characters Remaining:
Commenting by HaloScan
