bARABie comments section
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m3159...&hd=&size=1&
l=e
I believed to have run it because even kristoff wrote;
The U.S. dismantled Iraq’s army, broke the Baath Party and helped install a pro-Iranian government in Baghdad. If Iran’s ayatollahs had written the script, they couldn’t have done better — so maybe they did write the script ...
And instaed I posted it because I am a zionist.
Just out of curiosity, which are the other pieces of zionist propaganda we "continue publishing"?
Paola Pisi
What is all this about?
Uruknet publishes as many articles for the palestinians as for the iraqis...
I think you are wrong on this one barabie and I don't think you have a right to call paola a zionist either...she has done more for iraqis than iraqis themselves...
Shame.
I said and it's there on the blog as well, "I removed uruknet because they continue PUBLISHING zionist propaganda". They are two different things Layla.
Paola i said "continue" which yes means more than once, most of my articles which were deconstructed came from uruknet.
http://
washingtonbureau.typepad....the_morgue.html
"OK. I am a zionist because I posted this article by Kristoff:"
And Uruknet is a news sourcea and it publishes from the NY times, the BBC, Reuters, alternative press, blogs,Globalresearch,counterpunch,middle eastonlines, ahram weekly, guardian, timesonline,washingtonpost,latimes, afp news, mc clatchy, iraqi sites, palestinian blogs,...
And you can deconstruct kristoff as much as you like...what he said about the Americans destroying Iraq and propping up a regime being pro iran is totally true.
I still think your accusation is ill founded and shameful.
Layla don't twist things around, i thought you had more morals than that.
kristoff, cockburn and numerous others do pay lip service to the Arabs/Muslims but that does not change the fact they are zionists.
My point is there is no way haaretz/nyt/washington times so on would publish articles by Arabs/Muslims supporting Arabs/Muslims but uruk sees fit to do so.
You want to read articles by the same swine murdering your people, you go right ahead but don't tell me i am "SHAMEFUL" for not wanting to.
Also how dare you call me "SHAMEFUL". YA ABI SHOUM.
Maybe you should read your own post. How MANY of the above are zionists?
You prove my point better than i do.
By the way, my name is Paola, not Paolo: I am a woman. And the picture of President Saddam Hussein you posted here
http://barabie.blogspot.com/2007...m/2007...ssein-
said.html is photoshopped: Saddam didn't wear earrings.
regards,
Paola
paola pisi | Homepage | 25.03.07 - 8:44 pm | #
____________________
Paola, first my apologies about how i spelt your name. I know you are a female, i was not spelling your name that way to indicate i thought you were male, just an honest mistake. For that i apologize.
The point you raise about Saddam's pic is a very good and RELEVANT one, relevant to this thread.
I have obviously made a mistake in putting that pic up (thank you for pointing out btw), who knows that pic may have been "photoshopped" by a zionist. By me putting that pic up does not make ME a zionist.
But it does make me someone who publishes zionist propaganda. That in itself does NOT make me a zionist but it does make me someone WHO PUBLISHES ZIONIST PROPAGANDA.
Please you and Layla understand English better.
bARABie | Homepage | 25.03.07 - 10:49 pm | #
____________________________
Barabie, please be serious. If I claim that a website "continue publishing zionist propaganda", I mean that it is a zionist website.
And usually people who run zionist websites are themselves zionist (in the opposit case, they are skizophrenic ).
You of course posted unintentionally the doctored Saddam's pictures, whilst i read the articles i run: so if I run zionist propaganda, I do it intentionally.
And it wasn't enough to write that you removed the link to uruknet because
we "continue publishing zionist propaganda", now you posted a blog entry titled "Uruknet publishes zionist propaganda".
And maybe do you maintain that this is a friendly criticism? It is a heavy and slandering attack, and you well know it is. In order to probe that we spread "zionist propaganda", you
posted even the link to an uruknet's article on the shortage of safe water in iraq and the risk of cholera http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m3159......&hd=&size=1&
l=e. Only God knows why it is a zionist piece. Maybe we have the magical power to turn everything into zionist propaganda, even the news about shortage of drinking water.
Why did you choose to attack in such a slandering way just uruknet? I don't know the reply, and however it is your business, not mine.
But please, now don't joke and don't pretend to have made a fair criticism.
paola pisi | Homepage | 26.03.07 - 2:17 am | #
_______________________
Paola, for the record, i do NOT think you are a zionist and have NEVER called you one. I realize English is a second language for you and Layla.
"And usually people who run zionist websites are themselves zionist". Notice you use the word "usually"? Meaning NOT ALWA
"And usually people who run zionist websites are themselves zionist". Notice you use the word "usually"? Meaning NOT ALWAYS, so even people who "run zionist websites" are not always zionists. Point being you yourself admit that one doesn't have to be a zionist to post zionist literature.
As for me posting an entry titled "uruknet publishes zionist propaganda, that was in reply to your saying i called you a zionist and Layla's charming abuse.
In regards to the cholera article, as i said obviously English is not your first language. Do you know what subliminal messages are? Honestly if this was worth it, i would sit there and show you numerous ways zionist twist things when they write.
I personally think what you are doing is a great but not necessarily fair.
There are plenty of zionist sites those zionist you publish can get published.
Re only attacking uruknet, i only linked to uruknet, if there others i linked to and i discovered the same about them, i would have done the exact same thing.
Saying things like "i am a zionist" or "i am stupid" to me because of what i said was ridiculous. Layla telling me i am shameful for exercising my rights is shameful of her. Just disgusting.
bARABie | Homepage | 26.03.07 - 5:40 am | #
__________________
Barabie, so I run a zionist website but i am not a zionist, because I am not able to understand what I post. Wonderful.
However you too have some difficulties with english, because Layla didn't write that you are shameful: she wrote "I still think your accusation is ill founded and shameful. " It is quite different. Of course you exercise your rights by claiming that uruknet is a zionist website, and other people exercise their rights by writing that your accusation (not you) is shameful.
paola pisi | Homepage | 26.03.07 - 6:29 am | #
_____________________________
"Barabie, so I run a zionist website but i am not a zionist," This is getting no where. I NEVER SAID YOU RUN A ZIONIST WEBSITE. damn. Maybe if you were sitting here you would understand my frustration at your lack of knowledge in English and i am being nice btw.
As for Layla, why twist things Paola?
Just for you,
I think you are wrong on this one barabie and I don't think you have a right to call paola a zionist either...she has done more for iraqis than iraqis themselves...
Shame.
Layla Anwar | 25.03.07 - 8:12 am | #
You conveniently take only one comment and twist in to your liking. What i linked to was before the statement you linked to but whatever. This is getting boring.
Anonymous | 26.03.07 - 7:14 am | #
_____________________________________
twist "it" to your liking.
Anonymous | 26.03.07 - 7:15 am | #
_________________________
Oh Paola if you want to talk about "shame", would the Netherlands ring a bell to a certain someone?
Anony
I don't understand your hint, I'm an italian, i never went to Netherlands and i'm really bored. Think what you like and good luck.
paola pisi | Homepage | 26.03.07 - 9:21 am | #
Wednesday, 28 March, 2007
Commenting by HaloScan
