Thanks for pointing out how that study is totally ridiculous. To compare being a mom to the demands and qualifications of a modern CEO or a trained psychologist is simply preposterous. If being a mom were as difficult as it is to become a CEO or psychologist we would have hardly any children in this world.

Also, the vast majority of working women make less than the $134K deemed in that study to be the "value" of being a stay-at-home mother. Even though working women get up every day and perform at jobs in which they do things they hate all day long, like all working people, their work is somehow less arduous or valuable than that of the stay-at-home moms who populate the Chevy Chase Starbucks all afternoon while not contributing to the tax base?
Leonardo | 05.03.07 - 6:43 pm | #

With the way kids are growing up these days... I'd say there would be a lot of unemployed former mothers out in the motherly workforce.
colson | Homepage | 05.03.07 - 11:08 pm | #

Tell these moms to work smarter, not harder.
Russ | 05.04.07 - 10:03 am | #

cicero--does it work with $20 bills? I use the $50 for lighting my cigars, but I like the idea
Rob | 05.04.07 - 12:53 pm | #