How come wikipedia doesn't have article on chess blogs.
Goran | 03.09.07 - 5:57 am | #

Don't know, but as you may remember the wikipedia guardians took offense when an article on the Knights Errant was posted (see here and here).
DG | Homepage | 03.09.07 - 8:48 am | #

yup
Goran | 03.09.07 - 10:52 am | #

'"In the next two hours, I bet I can find 5 chess blogs you've never seen before." Any takers?'

You're on. I'll trust you to use only two hours, and you'll trust me when I say whether I've seen them or not. My database has 275 entries, of which 127 were active in the last six months. Please give me a heads-up when you're ready. - Mark

P.S. I'll accept no more than one blog not written in English!
Mark Weeks | Homepage | 03.16.07 - 7:02 am | #

All right, I'll let you know when I'm ready (though probably not anytime in the next few days). Not sure I agree with the English only requirement, but I'll go with it for the sake of "science."
DG | Homepage | 03.16.07 - 7:46 am | #

Hi DG, glad to have found your blog (thanks to Michael at Kenilworth's link).

Can I add one more to your list of active chess blogs... mine! http://chesstales.blogspot.com

Keep up the great blogging, Roger
Roger Coathup | Homepage | 03.25.07 - 4:37 pm | #