|
|
|
Not exactly what you are talking about, but:
I once got to play Legal's mate in Harvard Square. It is a lot of fun to watch everyone standing around laughing at my queen-loss 'blunder' only to turn the tables--and the direction of the laughter-- with an immediate checkmate.
Another time I got to play the two-move fool's mate. My college roommate offered to play me a game; after the 2-move embarrassment, he never wanted to play again.
Jason |
07.01.08 - 1:47 pm | #
|
|
I dream of having a forced mate and not completely overlooking it . . . does that count?
Keith Ammann |
07.01.08 - 9:24 pm | #
|
|
How about throwing up some of the games, yours or Reti's?
Guest |
07.01.08 - 11:30 pm | #
|
|
Keith, it counts in my book, we are in the same boat.
Ben Goldberg |
07.02.08 - 5:10 am | #
|
|
Unfortunately the Soviets defused these beautiful Reinfeld fairy tale formations. We can blame Botvinnik and the origins of the "scientific method" -- applying logic to defeat club play fantasy formations. The Soviet scenario versus White's Stonewall Attack: black engineers a trade of the light square bishops, white's light squares become weak and he loses agonizing endings.
I saw Herman Grooten (NLD) defeat Erik Pedersen (DEN) in a very nice effort using the above outline in the 80s in a Belgian tournament.
Mark Ginsburg |
Homepage |
07.04.08 - 12:17 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|