Planck's Constant - Fighting World Terror
Scope of Political Marketing
Political Marketing is being used and implemented with different names and different shapes since centuries. In 1950 Political Marketing was defined as a separate subject please sees history of Political Marketing for reference and details.
Still this subject is in developing phase and need to do a lot to formally recognize Political Marketing as separate subject. In my point of view Political Marketing is highly significant in all countries especially in democrat governments and more especially to developed countries. Political Marketing is essential for political parties, leaders, government and as well as for general public. Political Marketing brings stability in political culture of a country that in return brings prosperity in national economy at root and gross level. Without Political Marketing or misuse of Political Marketing it is really intricate to better understand public needs and it is so intricate to create and develop good governance in a society.
Visit http://www.political-marketing.net for more details
To better understand the scope of Political Marketing I would like to quote two examples. 1st for the country where Political Marketing is being implement since many years and in contrast to this the another country where Political culture is not developed yet in parties as well as political leaders are not aware about Political Marketing.
On 1st hand I will like to quote USA. Where we can see very clear that Americans are implementing Political Marketing since many years in America, before elections the candidates create and develop a philosophy for their election campaign. So they are clear about what they are communicating in their dialogue. At all level their philosophy remains same, their goals, mission and objective does not change, audience to audience and place to place.
What ever they communicate for coalition parties or public, in New York or in any other state, the theme of their communication at all level remains same because they are well prepared, we can’t find any contradiction in their speeches, it builds harmony and trust in public. As a result we can see that in America normally election forecasting is done before elections by survey and pools and election result proofs those predictions.
Visit http://www.political-marketing.net for more details
On other hand I would like to quote an example of a developing country where political culture is not as developed yet. We can see that in Pakistan there is political instability, political leaders in Pakistan are not well aware about the importance of Political Marketing due to lack of knowledge. There is no research, no philosophy and no proper developed campaign. One leader is talking and communicating other things compare to other leader of same party, even we can notice very clearly that same leader is communicating in different way with different theme and objective on different occasions and at different territories. Its due to lack of research, lack of proper philosophy and agenda and without preparation of any centralized campaign. As a result public don’t believe their promises and other parties get advantage of their contradictions, however we can see instability, lack of trust inside party and no clear vision.
If we summarize all discussion and keep in mind both examples its clear that without research, developed philosophy and centralized political marketing and election campaign and theme it is impossible to build public trust and harmony at national level. we must give a direction to political activities to get good results for a better future.
For the reason our organization, political marketing services slogan is “VOTE FOR TOMORROW” that describes well all functions of political marketing at all levels, government, political parties, leaders and for public.
Article written by Mr. Aftab Hussain
http://www.political-marketing.net
aftab, I'm allowing your comment with links as is even tho it smacks of commercialism.
Although BHO's followers are singing kumbaya with Islam, the effort is fated to fail.
Islam and the West are immiscible. The values systems are, in large part, diametrically opposed.
I'll give you point of convergence:
"Americans fight wars to liberate. " A laughable idea for anyone who realizes that the very foundation of the americas is conquest of foreign land for white/christian domination over native dwellers. oh plus vietnam,korea,lat-am,iraq ,afghanistan. i am sure the US army is lurrrved all over the world.
stop the futile navel gazing.
dsylexic, you are wrong. american forces were assisting native dwellers in their armed struggles against destruction and domination by other armed native dwellers in the nations you mentioned. and you forgot kuwait,where the native dwellers asked american forces to help them expel an invasion by the natives of iraq, a neighboring nation. americans obliged and liberated kuwait from the invaders. kuwait is not dominated by white christians, as you should know.
DSYLEXIC, you were so wrong that I had to blog to answer you. See America and Imperialism
[The haloscan comment links don't seem to be able get through firewalls. This is from home]
In 2005 I wrote a short piece about the subject:
Zaquari on Democracy; Montesquieu on Religion
I looked at a speech by Al-Zarqawi (head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, since then sent on his journey to his reward in the afterlife). He talks about democracy. He understands it perfectly. He could give civics classes here.
The only problem is, he considers it evil and blasphemous. It is incompatible with Islam and with the Koran. He explains, quite patiently, how democracy is perverse and heretical.
Your title point - America and Islam are mutually exclusive - is proven over and over again. They don't even bother to hide it - over there.
ZZMike, a most excellent piece of writing. Why did you stop blogging?
Commenting by HaloScan
For Comment Guidelines, read Bernie's 8 Rules on Comments & Trackbacks
Hint: You can include an URL or link address in the comment body by enclosing it thus:
