You left out the best photo of her.
;-)
I really agree with the choice of Governor Palin for Vice President. She is so right on. What I like most is that Gov. Palin wants to teach creationism in our schools. My hope is Gov. Palin and Senator McCain get elected so we don't have science classes anymore. Without the two of them in Washington, who is going to ring the bell for creationism?
I've been telling people for years, we should cut science classes in the schools and just teach reading and writing and arithmetic. And maybe history. But all this evolution theory is for the birds and bees. I mean studying science can be hard. If you want to learn something about science, you really have to work at it. Science just confuses people and I think we can all agree, we don't need any more confused people.
For example, if President Bush had started reading the bible earlier in life, he wouldn't be so confused by himself and confusing to us. I shudder when I think of all the unlearning he had to do after he was born again and accepted Jesus into his life. If he had just started with the Bible, he wouldn't have had to learn anything else. It's all right there.
This idea of teaching creationism instead of science is also good economic policy. If we cut science classes, we can save money by not hiring science teachers and we wouldn't have to have school science projects. I mean who cares what’s in a petrie dish. If you want to know, just look at the forgotten leftovers in the refrigerator.
Lastly, if we stop teaching science we wouldn't need science books, we could just use the Bible. I mean, there it is right in the very first verses of the Bible how God created the world. You can't make it any simpler than that. And practically everybody has a bible, most people I know have 2 or 3. I mean, even Jews have Bibles. Well, at least the Old Testament anyway. And the Muslims have the Koran which also says God created the heavens and the earth in six days and then rested.
Creationism is not theory, it’s a fact--check it out.
ed, please go back to Obama internet troll school. Your effort above is pathetic and an insult to all hardworking Obama internet trolls everywhere.
The truth of what your sloppy workproduct above was trying to make political hay out of is set forth on little green footballs which is rabidly against the teaching of creationism.
"LGF readers are probably aware that I am no creationist; in fact, I am strongly opposed to the teaching of “intelligent design” or “creation science,” or any other name the advocates for creationism concoct in their relentless quest to promote pseudo-science.
So I was disturbed to learn of Sarah Palin’s apparent support for creationism. However, as I posted in a comment earlier, she does not appear to be the fanatical type who wants to force or sneak the teaching of creationism into public school science classrooms.
But this is going to be a point of attack for the left, as Wired Magazine’s Brandon Keim demonstrates in this article: McCain’s VP Wants Creationism Taught in School.
"Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin wants creationism taught in science classes.
In a 2006 gubernatorial debate, the soon-to-be governor of Alaska trotted out the usual creationist education canard: “Teach both. You know, don’t be afraid of education. Healthy debate is so important, and it’s so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.”
Teaching evolution and creationism in a scientifically balanced way is simply impossible. Evolution is accepted by scientists as driving the development of life on Earth. Creationism, which puts a (Christian) God in the engine room of life, is unsupported by science. Its arguments have been roundly dismissed by scientists — many of whom, it should be noted, believe in God. They’re just sensible enough to understand where science ends and religion begins."
This is all true as far as it goes, but it’s a bit dishonest of Keim not to quote the rest of Palin’s statements in the article he linked: ‘Creation science’ enters the race.
"In an interview Thursday, Palin said she meant only to say that discussion of alternative views should be allowed to arise in Alaska classrooms:
“I don’t think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum.”
She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state’s required curriculum.
Members of the state school board, which sets minimum requirements, are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Legislature.
“I won’t have religion as a litmus test, or anybody’s personal opinion on evolution or creationism,” Palin said."
Looks like Palin made an off-the-cuff statement during a debate on a hot topic, didn’t really expect the criticism she’d get, and then softened her position considerably in a follow-up interview. But to quote just the first part of her statements on creationism and ignore the second is misleading; because in the clarification she’s describing a position that doesn’t cause me (a staunch anti-creationist) any discomfort."
http://www.littlegreenfootballs....blog/
weblog.php
When it's this easy to disprove the contentions of a troll, the troll simply isn't putting his heart into his work.
So ed the troll can keep up with the work of other Obama trolls:
http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=13191
So...when are you people going to tell us how long you are going to send a woman to jail, for having an abortion?
Making abortion illegal, does not stop them from happening. There are historical records of abortions going back centuries. Nations that currently outlaw abortions...still have them performed, illegally, and at a rate equal to that of nations that allow abortion.
So, how many years in jail for the womam?
Aren't our jails full enough?
Commenting by HaloScan
