I'll break the previews into team by team pages sometime tomorrow and post it when I'm done.
Pat | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 10:55 pm | #

Er, column headers would help...
Foz | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 10:55 pm | #

Like, my lips to God's ears. Impressive.
Foz | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 10:56 pm | #

This was spot on last year.
24 hour | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 11:22 pm | #

there was an article predicting a GT win a little earlier. i refreshed and its gone. what was that?
IrishInGatorCountry | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 11:25 pm | #

Hit the post button a touch too early. It'll be back.
Pat | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 11:26 pm | #

guess i am just too anxious for new articles... lsu game is getting boring.
IrishInGatorCountry | Email | Homepage | 08.30.07 - 11:27 pm | #

Great analysis. However, the reason why Purdue is a little overrated, and GT and BC a little underrated, is because of the excessive weighting given to the TE position (PU is #2 here, while GT and BC are #11 and #8, respectively). I believe you initially stated that you'd blend the WR and TE rankings together in the final analysis to account for this. I think, with this change, things'll be just about perfect.
PeteatND | Email | Homepage | 08.31.07 - 9:31 am | #

Good call Peteatnd.

I just updated the table with the blended WR/TE number.
Pat | Email | Homepage | 08.31.07 - 9:37 am | #

No problem - looks pretty darn accurate to me, now. It confirms my suspicion that, based only on personnel, GT should be just about as tough as UCLA and PSU. We've got the Jackets in our place, though...
PeteatND | Email | Homepage | 08.31.07 - 10:34 am | #

Any chance you can work in a link to cheerleader aesthetics too?

Excellent work, hats off to you for research and imperical analysis.

I expect MSU to be a more difficult game than Purdue or Stanford, although I agree with your ranking of MSU's personnel.
malibuIrish | Email | Homepage | 09.01.07 - 12:45 pm | #