|
|
|
I'm glad to hear that Kiffin was praising Sullivan, I was working and listening, but not watching, the game and I thought he was blaming Sullivan for the failed attempt. I was cringing and muttering to myself. |
|
He was more just kidding around with the reporter than praising Sullivan. The reporter joked around that the play call left a slight crack open for the South team and that's exactly how things ended. Not a good week for Lane. |
|
Training for the combine tryouts has become the norm. What does it cost? Who provides the training? Do you have to be invited to the premier draft prep camps? This is something that flies below the radar screen for me. Thanks. |
|
Subway, I finished reading The NFL Draft, a book going through the process, and often the agent fronts the bill for players training before the combine. Then it just comes out of the signing bonuses, usually, if they get drafted. If I remember correctly it was about 10,000. |
|
Does anyone know if only graduating seniors are invited, or is it 4th/5th year players who have exhausted their eligibility? |
|
dtib - The game is for invited collegiate seniors. In other words, players who have just recently exhausted their college eligibility. |
|
Great summary of the Senior Bowl, Pat. (There was only a one-paragraph report buried in the LA Times, so I had no idea of our guys' performances.) I'll be sure to watch next year's bowl based on your commentary. |
|
I must be losing my mind...the way I saw it Kiffin was blaming Sullivan for convincing him to go for it instead of taking the 3 and likely icing the game. I'll have to see if NFL Network is replaying the telecast this week, because I could swear he said something like "I should've never listened to a Notre Dame guy" rather than "Now I know better than to not listen to Notre Dame guys" as you tell it. Obviously no big deal at all, but I'd be interested to see it again. |
|
It's enteresting that Sullie had a good game (Senior Bowl) against premier talent. Is this indicative of the lack of schemes he played under or his lack of effort throughout the year? Just wondering. |
|
Zibby's in Siberia, just west of Milwaukee... |
|
Sullivan kicking a--? Zbikowski taking "great angles to the ball?" If not for Laws' performance, I would be convinced this game was played in Bizarro World. |
|
Thank you for the information, Pat. I am hoping the NFL Network will replay the game, as I totally missed it. Ack! |
|
For what it's worth, I just read this in a Q&A on an NFL draft site: |
|
Actually, I just looked that over again and it was from last year. Maybe his opinion has changed since then... |
|
I think Laws will be a steal if he's not picked until the 4th round. |
|
Here's hoping that Laws gets picked up by the Cleveland Browns with their second-round pick. Cleveland definitely needs some DL, and without a doubt, Laws is the best D-lineman in the draft that WON'T go in the first round. Its pretty much a guarantee will most likely be available in the second round, and I think it would be bad for Cleveland to pass on him. |
|
chrisnd...plus he would be teamed with Brady Quinn...not on the field at the same time but on the same team. That couldn't be too bad. |
|
That Trevor Laws interview mentions the '05 SC game as the one thing he'd like to do over. I'm starting to think that that's going to be the defining game of my 4 years here (I've got one more, so we'll see), and man that would've been one for the ages to win. |
|
Unless something goes wrong, I've got one more season to go as well, and USC '05 is the defining win of my time at ND. Too bad we didn't actually win. |
|
So it looks like this is going to be our worst draft (in terms of amount drafted and highest position drafted) in quite some time. I don't know whether that is reassuring, considering our very down year, or downright depressing based upon the amount of people we had drafted last year. |
|
NavyJoe, |
|
I think Sully's performance this year says a lot about the players surrounding him. I believe Morton was quoted earlier in the year saying the reason Young looked so good was because he had seniors telling him where to go. I wonder how much of Sully's performance this year had to do with the lack of experience on all sides. Voice could probably give a little more insight on the importance of having great players along side the newbies on the O line. |
|
"Few misguided shotgun snaps"?! We led the NCAA in that play this year. Charlie had to remove the shotgun from the playbook half-way through the year and it was still too late. |
|
Doug, |
|
Michael, having seasoned, confident veterans lined up beside you on the OL is invaluable. Recognizing fronts and making calls is important because tackles need to know who to block, and having a wily guard to tell you who to block can greatly reduce the "pucker factor". Knowing the correct guy to block allows the tackle to play agressively (as opposed to tentatively). Tentative offensive linemen get beat! The guard informs the tackle who to block based on who he, the guard, is set to block. Thus they won't both block the same guy and/or leave a defender unblocked while both figuring the other guy has it. Even when 2 guys have to block 3, identifying the defender who is the least dangerous to any given play is quite important, and a savvy, quick thinking interior man can greatly assist a young, inexperienced tackle. Morton, evidently, kept Sam Young apprised of who to block, and this year's younsters, predictably, were less adept. We can expect significant improvement in '08. |
|
This is totally off topic, but Peter King on SI.com referenced this article (at least I think it was him) about some of the shenanigans that went on at UW over the last 10 years. I would rather Notre Dame never win another national championship than to have a program that has these kind of kids. |
|
correction, it was Andy Staples with the article. |
|
Could not believe your interpretation of the Kiffin comments regarding the failed 4th down play versus kicking the field goal. Fortunately, I Tivo'd the game and replayed the Kiffin comments on Sully. He was not praising Sully, he was chiding/teasing Sully for talking him into going for it on that 4th down play. However, Kiffin was not passing the buck, he seemed like he was just having fun with it. Just a Trojan having a little fun at the expense of the Irish. The audio on this is very clear. Could it be that you intentionally misled the readers? |
|
ND4ME2006 - I TIVO'd the game as well and that is what I thought he said. At first I thought he was teasing him too but when I listened to it again, it sounded like he said he "should have listened" to Sully instead of "shouldn't have". I just took another listen and you're right. |
|
NavyJoe, |
|
I was commenting more on the entire ten year span as opposed to just this past year. In fact, I think this past year is one of the few that should get a pass, seeing as we're only going to have two or three guys drafted. |
|
I've been keeping score, Pat, and by my account, you and Jay are correct 99% of the time. Keep up the great work. BTW, I did not mean to imply that you were trying to pull a fast one on us; just thought you were having a little fun at Kiffin's expense. |
|
http://
seattletimes.nwsource.com...bkelley300.html |
|
Zibby's 38-yard return was on a kickoff, not a punt. Still the longest runback in the game, but not quite so impressive. |
|
72 Visitors Online |
Commenting by HaloScan.com |