Very fascinating numbers!


I'd love to see these numbers during the Holtz years.


Watching Stanford last night, there may be something to this theory. Instead of actually playing the games, can we just call them based on O-Line starts? 8-4, baby. Hope we draw an inexperienced opponent in the Gator Bowl.


Judging from those numbers, 7-5 should be about right.


Interesting and intriguing. Yes, what does his research data reveal? Crystal ball? Roll of the dice? Dart board? A cold 12 pack?
More imprtantly, if you factor potential ND starters for 2008 playing all year, what does it look like for 2009, the anticipated Championship Run??


Pat, your music references never cease to amaze me. Some day I want to peek at your ipod.

Oh, and here's to hope for beating Michigan. Though the one game I'm going to is the UW game (seattle, jimi hendrix, i'm having a transcendent moment right now), so lets count on their crappy defense keeping us in the game.


very interesting. thnx.
on the bright side: 1) better than last year and 2) better than Michigan and SC.


Hey, look at it this way. That's 65 starts after the SD State game. Getting close! What I would really like to see is how starts compares to minutes played. I think our o-line would jump up a bit.


I think playing time is a better indicator than "Starts".


There was some good discussion on IE about this yesterday.


Great post, Pat. With the exception of SD St, it seems like the strength of our opponent is almost going in reverse order. I had us at 7-5, with the "definite" losses being BC, UM and USC. Those are 3 of the bottom 5 teams listed here. I don't think it is a coincidence that those 3 teams (plus Navy) also had good years last year compared to the top of the list (Wash, Staford, UNC). What thay says to me is they were good in 2007 because of an experienced o-line and now that they lost many of those guys, it makes for an inexperienced line in 2008. The converse is true of Washington, UNC and Stanford -- they were awful last year because of an inexperienced o-line. However, most of those guys played together last year, which accounts for the high number of starts (ie experience) on their 2008 roster.


I don't think the ND 1988 offensive line was all that experienced. I know we had lost former co-captains Byron Spruell and Chuck Lanza to graduation. There may have been others -- Tom Rehder comes to mind. Andy Heck was a returning starter. I remember that Mike Heldt was a new starter at center (in place of Lanza) It would be interesting for someone to look that up.

By contrast, my recollection is that the 1993 offensive line was extremely experienced (Aaron Taylor and company). So, I would definitely tend to agree that having an experienced offensive line bodes very well for a team although having an inexperienced line is not necessarily something that cannot be overcome.


Excuse me, but wouldn't both of our top two opponents have to overcome coaching incompetence? You are not being far to Harbaugh by singling out the Golfer. As a michigan grad, I'm certain that Jim is equally incompetent.


I actually think Harbaugh is going to be a fairly decent head coach in time. At the very least, he works hard. He also has Stanford off to a good start on the recruiting front, which only makes the rest of his job easier.


Assuming this metric to hold true (and it appears that it does, in general), the questions then become, how does a team maintain this number at a high level consistently, and how does ND get away from the sinusoidal effect of having what appears to be two years above followed by two years below. Adding depth in each class definitely helps, however, it seems that a team could not "add" more than 2 "new" lineman to the mix per year. would.


So if it wasn't Harbaugh, I guess you were calling out Butch Davis?


Seems like this metric would be better if he set some sort of "average cumulative starts" or something that could take into account for having, say, the left side of the line be 3 year starters and two first timers on the right? Of course maybe that was factored into "success."


that would just be "average starts"

this engineer isn't so good with statistics and such.


rustle...less coffee, sir. You seem to be rattling the okay button a bit.


Your so-called facts don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy mixed-up world. Stop putting your readers to sleep with a lot of mathematical mumbo-jumbo and take a cue from E-Ess-Pee-N; people want big, bold opinions based on colorful anecdotes and experience. Not fancy numbers that some bigshot says run the show. What's next, a magic stick that lets you talk to a Chinaman? A carriage that flies in the clouds?


I think the cutoff should be 59.


If the 5 starters with 48 starts this year start all 13 games (bowl included) and start next year as well, we'll have 113. Look out world, 2009 is coming! :)


I don't think Turkovich has any more eligibility after this season.

Didn't Georgia have three freshmen starters on the o-line last year? It didn't slow them down. You can get it done with some young guys. After all, "there's nothing that can't be done". - McManus


I think SC will be just fine with there 25 starts....it's about depth, which ND is finaly starting to get. Hate the bye week to start with by the way.


Good article Pat. Standard greatness for you all.
By the Way; Jeff Samardzija(sp) won his first major league victory today in Chicago.
Philadelphia had put runners at the corners with two outs in the top of the seventh before Ryan Howard's hard grounder went off Derrek Lee. The first baseman retrieved the ball and flipped to pitcher Jeff Samardzija for the out, but replays showed Howard beat the throw. Phillies third-base coach Steve Smith was ejected by plate umpire Bill Welke during the ensuing argument.

Samardzija (1-0), a former Notre Dame receiver, got his first major league win. Carlos Marmol struck out two with two on in the eighth and pitched a perfect ninth for his seventh save in nine chances.


Not wanting to thread-jack (and not knowing a whole lot about baseball), but isn't this some kind of speed record for a college draft pick to crack the rotation in the bigs, let alone open up with a win? I thought you had to spend a couple of years fetching the donuts in AA and AAA before you even got a toe in the door of a major league locker room.


early bye week is a huge minus - methinks charlie alluded to his in his presser - it essentially reduces the cumulative # of practice weeks by one.


Pat, Which ND player has the all-time most games started in their career. Young, with 25 heading into his junior year, must certainly be on his way to the most ever. Can you enlighten us?


since we play more games now (12) than we have in the past and since in three of Young's four years here we will have played in a bowl game (hopefully), it would seem that he would break the record for most starts somewhere in the vicinity of the 9th or 10th game next year.


well the clock is ticking towards kickoff.


i am just going to have to go ahead & say that the "bowl losing streak" is borderline disgraceful


HAHAHA! loved the pirate chart #1. loved the crack on ty #2! keep up the dry sense of humor. loved it!


For whatever it's worth, even with 91 starts, I seem to remember the 2006 line being pretty lousy. Brady Quinn covered up a lot of their weaknesses by being a mobile, veteran quarterback.


I am so happy college fudbaw is back. It's just the best.


Anyone else get a kick out of seeing Dickrod's revolutionary offense struggling to break 200 yards? Utah should've won that game by 2-3 TD's, but they did their best 2007 UCLA imitation in the 2nd half.


Michigan will experience a lot of growing pains this year, much like we did last year.

Paul, I'd say USC did pretty well today with their young O-line against Virginia. Put up 50+ points I think.


First week was real good. Tommorrow there is still some games. Utah could have killed Michigan if they wanted.


Some thoughts on yesterday:

People talk about ND being overhyped (obviously not an issue this year) but what about Clemson?? Every year is supposed to be "their" breakout year. They were an embarrassment last night and make no mistake, Alabama probably is not one of the five best teams in the SEC.

I know that it is still very early, but going on their performances yesterday, it is very hard to say that PITT or UNC are probably losses.

If we lose to Michigan, it will be because of special teams of a defensive touchdown. Their offense looked as inept as ours did last year.

We may not play a ranked team until we play USC and juding by their performance last night, they might be the consensus #1 team at that point in the season. They were scary good yesterday.


ditto navyjoe. Our schedule looks even easier after yesterday. If we were good we'd be undefeated going into USC. Alas. Eight wins I would gladly take though


I watched the Cal - Michigan State game last night here on the West Coast and trust me, we will not beat the Spartans. They are damn good - fast with both a good running and air game.


Re: Samardzija pitching for the Cubs

It's not all that unusual for top pitching prospects to spend < 1 year in the minors. This is especially true in late-inning relief, which is where he is getting his action this year. Jeff was clearly drafted much lower than his ability would have dictated b/c of the questions surrounding a potential football career.


damn good teams usually don't give up 38 points...


Well, there was a lot of talk about whether UM 2008 would be as bad as ND 2007. While it might not reach such historic pitifulness, it could get pretty bad for the skunkbears.

At this point, though, I'm just hoping UM 2008 is worse than ND 2008 in 13 days.

On a related note, San Diego State lost 29-27 at home against Div-II Cal Poly yesterday. We better have a 3-TD lead by halftime and win by at least 30, even if our backups play a substantial portion of the second half.


1. Did Michigan remind you at times of ND last year? Gee, what a difference the loss of a QB, a star RB, star wide receivers and the top OL make. Or is it that Rich Rodriguez is a lousy coach as some ND fans believe Weis now is??

2. How good USC is will be shown later this month when they play the Buckeyes.

3. Why worry about MSU? The ND Nation should have one total focus--to destroy SDSU!


Dateline Eugene, OR: The University of Oregon put up a racist effort beating coach tee time 44-10.


Guys, save your glee a bit. As bad as Michigan might have been, they were still in position to tie in the 4th quarter against a decent (yet mistake prone) Utah team. Michigan plays Miami of Ohio next, which should give them a win going into playing us. I'd save any comparisons with ND 2007 until after we play--if we hand them a 38-0 loss, then yeah, they're that bad. But I'm not convinced we're any better than they are at this point.


I mean, if you guys think we're that much better than Michigan, then are you saying we'd beat Utah by 2 TD's? I don't buy that.


Michigan's defense played much better in the second half against Utah. That defense could give ND's offense problems.


Willingham is now 11-26 and 6-21 in conference play at UW. His overall career coaching record is now below .500. This is not to take glee in his record but only to point out that ND's buying out his contract was not racist but no one on ESPN is mentioning this, is he?


Let's not give Michigan too much credit here. They didn't sustain a drive longer than thirty yards. Their defense gave up over 300 yards in the first half, and Utah got way too conservative in the second half and basically abandoned the passing game. Utah kept them in the game by abandoning what had been working for them and totaling an astounding 160+ yards of penalties.


Seems that the 75 doesn't hold true for everyone.

Washington 10

Oregon 44


This is an encouraging quote from Bruton that CW is undergoing a complete metamorphosis.

“He’s changed how he interacts with the team, too,” senior safety and captain David Bruton said. “Just the way he has been able to change for the well-being of the players and the well-being of the team, it’s been very enlightening to see that in your head coach, who was once so stern. You’re able to actually talk to him now and joke around him and feel comfortable with him.

“It is surprising. My freshman and sophomore years, I hardly talked to him. I felt uncomfortable.”


Michigan looked very much like we did last year. They will have difficulty scoring 20 points every week. Utah's starting QB was very poor in the second half. I think we stand an excellent chance of shutting them out.


Michigan was incredibly lucky if you saw the game. A TON of bad Utah penalties and dropped picks. A fuimbled punt. Utah looked awful


Prehaps using a combination of, # of starts and their position rank when being recruited.


Here is PA, the Penn State fans are all excited again after beating Coastal Carolina, a fledgling team who will use its share of the game take to expand its stadium's seating capacity to 7500!! JoePa is extolled for tying Bowden's record. Just think of the shit Weis and ND would take if they pulled a stunt like this!!


If Notre Dame ever scheduled Coastal Carolina we would never, ever hear the end of it from all the college football pundits.


Here's my 12 team ranking, w/gaps:

USC

Michigan State
Stanford
Boston College

Washington
Pitt
Purdue
Navy

Michigan
North Carolina
Syracuse
SDSU

Sight unseen, I'd guess we're about in the low middle of this easy schedule. Four gimmies that we should win if we're competent, 4 games that could break either way but I would expect us to win if we are competent and solidly coached, and four in which we'll be overmatched but may be competitive if we got more improvement in the offseason than it may be cynical to expect.

I predict 8 wins in a very easy schedule, but if we don't handle SDSU easily, I think only 4-5 wins are definite this year. Let's hope the Offense looks effective this weekend against an inferior opponent.

GO IRISH!


to be honest I think 10 wins is very possible but I see we will get 9 though.
After the first week.
Then again the first week doesnt tell you anything beacuse they are all cupcake games.


As of now, the ND-Michigan game has changed from a toss-up to a probable loss for Michigan. Good for us.

Just keep the Leahy's type practice going, Charlie.. and we'll be fine.

Go Irish.


there is absolutely no reason to think that we would be overmatched against Stanford. We controlled that game last year and we sucked. There is no way that they have improved more than we have.


I would like to agree with you, but Stanford is showing improvement in a very solid conference. They sure as hell played USC tougher than we did, and it's clear their coaching staff is making the most of their talent.

We may not be dogs against them if we show the kind of improvement we have a right to expect, but it's certainly not a sure thing. Let's hope we see it on the field over the next 2 weeks and I can go back to being a blissful homer.


Utah vs. U of M reminded me of ND vs. UCLA last year. That game was a MESS. If Utah has been able to find its behind with both hands they would've won by 2 or 3 TDs. That isn't to say they're a terrible team but they played a terrible game and still beat Michigan in their own house.


Why are there so many people here inviting so grand a fall from the grace of the football gods for ND football this year with the speculation that UM will now be an easy win in view of their first game against Utah? The season prospects for many teams were hinted at over this past weekend, but until our team plays, how can anyone say anything about how ND will perform against the teams that did play? I thought I had provided a few doses of reality a couple weeks ago. Apparently not. So here goes again:

ND's successes this season will depend on the play of the OL. There is nothing from any of the practice videos that have been made available to suggest (at least to my eyes) that they are THAT greatly improved from last year, the size and quickness improvements notwithstanding. The opponent DL report from Pat is relatively dire in view of the pressure that is on the ND OL to perform. So PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop predicting what we'll do against UM just because they lost at home against Utah. UM has the luxury of two games to get a few things straight before Sept. 13 rolls around, one of which was a mistake filled game from which I would bet they will learn a lot; whereas ND has only SDSU, which will tell us nothing if we blow them up, will tell us a little if we win a close game, and will tell us a lot if we lose. (Please, Notre Dame Our Mother, let it not be the latter.)

Like our chances better in view of this past weekend? Fine. But we have yet to lace up the cleats in inter-school competition, so let's not go overboard, people.


IndyEsq:
1. I have been to ND twice in the last three weeks. The practice area is as secure as it gets unless you are in a helicopter. I was chased away just trying to peek in the one sliver of light that existed in the fence. I suspect that most if not all of what ihas been disseminated to the public is orchestrated and not nearly a full reflection of what is going on.

2. Michigan at times really looked like ND last year. Lose a good QB, a star RB, excellent receivers (sound familiar?), an all-world offensive lineman, all of which puts significant pressure on the defense, and the results speak for themselves. But, as with some bloggers here who have said Weis is a lousy coach, I am waiting to hear that Rodriguez is now a lousy coach.


TBoneND:
IndyEsq thanks for the info on practices and the tight security. If we can run on SD St. Those closed practices will be a great advantage going into the uM(sucks) game.
I have a nephew who is an ardent uM(sucks) fan. He takes every oppurtunity to rub last year and CW in the dirt. After the Utah game it was so sweet seeing his expression and my not saying a single word. I think he wanted to crawl away somewhere.
All of that will be for naught if ND dosen't beat the badgers, I mean weasels well you know who I mean.


104 Visitors Online

Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ?

Commenting by HaloScan.com