I'm sorry, Jay. I'll need further evidence. Can you link me to that Cleavage post please? 
Actor, I think Surbinator is kinda wrong, his title should be "The MaSurbator".
More appropriate.
Al doesn't use his military service as a "qualification". Surber "want's to see a candidate's DD214" because he served. Surber's never done anything more dangerous in his life than drive WV highways and I'm sure his column "Cleavage in Today's Army" was vital to our nation's military.
Jay
We're proud that Al Gore served in Vietnam, even if it was as a reporter for Stars and Stripes, so perhaps we'll cut Surber a little slack on that point.
But he gets a few million points in the other direction for being an asshole.
You've got Don all wrong. He was in the Army (so he says)as a Chairborne Ranger for the post newspaper. Giggle,Snort! He's even admitted not firing a weapon after basic.
His M.O. is to eject people for busting him, with his own words, on his prevarication. Google "The Surbinator" for a good dose of Beaker's bullshit.
And if you are so inclined maybe give his boss, Nanya Friend, a call at the Daily Mail -(304)348-5124 - and politely point out what a schmuck their little Malkin-suck-ass is.
Pipe down Charlie. I am sure Surbikins has an anal cyst which prevents him from enorlling.
Excuse the typos above. These rubes infuriate me.
And, Snuffy Surber, if you are reading, I served 8 years in the military, my pathetic little man. I know a coward and a blowhard when I see one. Time to man up, Snuffy, or shut the fuck up. If the challenge scares you, go have a circle jerk with Instarube and the rest of the other military-phobic but GI-Joe-doll loving yokels. You can use a picture of Bush in his flight suit for porn; I am sure you have already.
A double sawbuck says Snuffy Surber was never in the military. Yet another fucking pussy wingnut who talks tough but would never get in the game for real.
If challenged, he would immediately leap to all the typical wingnut excuses--too old, bad knee, too busy, blah blah blah. I am not buying it for one minute. He could sign up with one of the private security firms today and be in Baghdad before the month is out.
Would he or any of the other fucking pussy wingnuts do it? Not a chance. Will the spin wild justifications for why they wouldn't do it? Of course they will. Will they try to deflect the question away? A hundred times an away.
At the end of the day, Surber and his ilk are cowards and hypocrites, all too ready to tell others to fight, and never with the balls to do it themselves.
I posted this in comments at Surber's blog -- let's see if he responds.
This notion that speaking to hostile countries is “hugging” them is objectively perposterous. Reagan met how many times with the USSR? Nixon went to China. The Bushies went to N. Korea. Etc. Ad nauseum.
Grow up.
And doesn’t the Bush Doctrine say that if a nation harbors a terrorist, it’s just as guilty as the terrorist? So under that Doctrine, Obama would be justified in taking out al Qaeda in Pakistan.
Also, if the standard for being tough on al Qaeda is using nukes, Bush has failed that test as well. And since al Qaeda is stronger now than it was on 9/10, according to the Bush Administration’s own report, your party — which has presided over this debacle and has been unable to achieve victory in 2 wars — is in no position to lecture anyone on how to defeat them.
Maybe Surber would agree to ride one down, a la Dr. Strangelove?
Commenting by HaloScan
