- - - - - - - Langley Free Press Welcomes Your Comments - - - - - - - - - Name Email URL is optional
|
|
From Dona Cadman:
Dona Cadman for Surrey North
Media Advisory
March 3, 2008
Personal Statement by Dona Cadman
I’m a little bit surprised at the level of reaction to the disclosures in
Tom Zytaruk’s book and I guess that’s probably because it was put to rest in
my mind, when I discussed the matter with Stephen Harper, 2 ˝ years ago. At
that time, I recall specifically asking him if he was aware of a million
dollar insurance policy offer, that upset Chuck so much.
He looked me straight in the eyes and told me he had no knowledge of an
insurance policy offer. I knew he was telling me the truth; I could see it
in his eyes. He said, yes he’d had some discussions with two individuals
about asking Chuck to rejoin the party, but he’d told them they were wasting
their time trying to convince Chuck.
From that point forward…. I didn’t regard it as a “Party” initiative, but
rather; the overzealous indiscretion of a couple of individuals…. whose
identity, Chuck never revealed to me.
It all comes back to my conversation with the Prime Minister…. 2 ˝ years
ago. I want to be perfectly clear in that regard. Chuck liked, respected
and trusted Stephen Harper. I like, respect and trust Stephen Harper. If I
didn’t believe in my heart, that he was telling me the truth…. I wouldn’t be
running as the Conservative Candidate for Surrey North.
Dona Cadman
Keith Richmond |
03.03.08 - 10:12 am | #
|
|
Integrity? Dona Cadman in the last election publicly supported Penny Priddy who won the seat as an federal NDPr. Now she is running as a Conservative. Integrity or opportunism? Dona Cadman is no Chuck Cadman. Chuck Cadman's daughter is the better bet.
Anonymous |
03.03.08 - 11:27 am | #
|
|
Harper gave us all a similar innocent look when he promised that he would not change the rules about Income Trust investments. After what he did, there are three things that cannot be erased from my memory.
First of all I think there was absolutely no need to break the promise in the first place, because of the many more painless options available to him. Secondly I see no difference in the human behaviour of breaking a promise from outright lying. And last, I will always be curious as to the REAL reason why he broke that promise, but that would require that the truth be told. Fat chance!
Methinks |
03.03.08 - 11:49 am | #
|
|
Do you think that Dona and Stephen have been confering recently as leader to candidate? lol!
Anonymous |
03.03.08 - 11:50 am | #
|
|
No, I think they may have been confering about something else...."I can see it in his eyes"
eagerbeaver |
03.03.08 - 11:10 pm | #
|
|
"While not backing down from her allegation, Dona Cadman said yesterday that she’s certain Prime Minister Stephen Harper had nothing to do with the affair."
“He looked me straight in the eyes and told me he had no knowledge of an insurance-policy offer,” Dona Cadman said. “I knew he was telling me the truth. I could see it in his eyes.”
Straight In The Eyes: |
03.04.08 - 9:46 am | #
|
|
I am not part of a slate - look me in the eyes - LOL - See --->
http://www.kimrichter.com/Blog/
a...ts_slate_ad.pdf
Mayor Kurt, Look Me In The Eye |
03.04.08 - 9:57 am | #
|
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|