Good job taking the fight to him.
Thanks David!
So, does Mr. Greenwald earn a rating? If he is not to be believed even 'for a minute,' wil his rating be at one extreme?
Greenwald's the worst, and this one's the best "Blog Watch" yet. He's a snide jerk, and I second David's comments: good stuff taking the fight to him...
Duoist: The ratings seem a bit arbitrary or subjective. Greenwald's just as bad as Firedoglake, so to keep up with the ratings will be redundant.
I'm just getting the information out there in my series. People can read some of these antiwar types, and hopefully they'll pass along the word on their nihilism.
Thanks for your input...I may do a rating once in awhile, if I really find something particularly objectionable.
Angevin: There was nothing it...just a matter of laying it out. Takes some time though, to write it all up and proofread.
Thanks for the compliment!
Interesting character you've found here Don.
Hi Edge: Oh, he's well known, which is all the more reason to vigorously rebut his project.
Thanks for visiting.
Good one, it is linked up.
Thanks Goat!
Hi, Don, just stopped by. Liked the dissection of Greenwald.
Spot on. Greenwald is considered a political genius by the Left, but as someone who has been in counting rooms at the end of election night (Twice as a Dem, four times as a GOP) -- I can say with cetainty that Greenwald is nothing but a hack. He has nothing original to say or anything to bring to the table except verbiosity.
Was that too long?
PS: I am interested in exchanging links, but couldn't find your email to ask.
PPS: Another Blog Watch worth looking (and I reference him from my site) is: The Heathlander (he also cross posts on Daily Kos). As long as the Daily Kos sups with a Hamas loving Anti-Isreali Blogger, I will slam every Democrat with that smear.
I give ya credit for even bothering to analyze lefties my friend!
I agree with Angel. I give you credit too! I get to the point to where it's hard to read the BS that libtards publish, let alone watch their videos, although I have watched some Greenwald. Whenever I do enter the libtard den I feel like I need to take a shower afterwards.
Hi CoRev: Thanks for visiting.
JSF: I'll send you an e-mail later. Thanks for the heads up on Heathlander. I'll check it out.
Hi Angel: Know your enemy - one of the first principles of battle...
Hi Gayle: They are sick, but some people are easily influenced, especially college students.
My series, and the work of others, works to combat the misinformation. Please link or distribute the Blog Watch posts as you're able.
The hostile endeavors of yet another generator of anti-Americanism have been bought to light.
Greenwald’s problem is that he does not make for good arguing; instead, he launches one theatrical accusation after another, a raison d’etre loaded with hyperbole and verbosity.
Good posting
Thanks Ottavio!
well done, don. i'm linking to this one - it's one of your best and that's saying something!
Thank you, Heidi!
RE: "dismantling the rule of law" ...
Here's a little ditty for you, Mr. Greenwald:
If our liberties are under siege
Then why are you still here?
Why haven't you heard that midnight knock
That people like you fear?
If this were a Police State
You would have disappeared ...
If our liberties are under siege
Then why are you still here?
Who wrote that ditty?
That's it? That's your "take-down"? It basically consists of saying "Greenwald's wrong."
You reduce his argument about the Kagans to the "chickenhawk" argument, and leave it at that, as if his point must somehow, therefore, be wrong.
Same with the other points you "tackle." You simply refer to others who have called his argument "wrong," yet never actually address how it is that he's wrong. Very lazy writing.
Geek ...
... moi
You might be humored to know that in a recent debate with a moonbat they used the Greenwald/Fox link as a source to prove that the right routinely calls the left unpatriotic...
Commenting by HaloScan
