if he tells more of the truth behind the spin of this presidency i am all for it.
Why are we not talking about impeachment again?
Because Nancy Pelosi has spoken!
Why are we not talking about impeachment again?
That ship sailed more than 30 years ago, when Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon - and EVERYBODY BOUGHT INTO IT.
That was the moment when the American Republic jumped the shark.
Ever since, then, it's been a Countdown to Caesar.
Except that thanks to our profoundly self-destructive culture of hypocrisy and anti-intellectualism, mixed like one of Chemical Ali's sarin/mustard gas cocktails, we'll never be so lucky as to draw the likes of Julius. Instead, we get Little Boots.
You get what you pay for.
Shorter Scotty:
"I'm sorry I lied, but I knew it was a lie, so that doesn't make me a bad person who lies. I can has book deal now? kthnxbai"
Dear Scotty,
Please come to a book reading near me. Thank you.
Yours,
Marek
Why are we not talking about impeachment again?
because Nancy Pelosi has spoken!
Next question.
You know what they say about being part of the problem or part of the solution, me thinks that the DINO's are a major part of the problem, but then I guess that's why they are DINO's,
Oh and on Scotty and the stenographers if the "so called" press actually acted like reporters then this lying piece of shit wouldn't be able to go near any of them without being spat on.
Republicans have never cared about counter-proliferation and arms control so it wasn't surprising that they would destroy a network devoted to it.
I guess its because it doesn't enrich any of their friends. Oh yeah, the traitors are still in power and top one commuted the sentence of another one.
But impeachment is off the table.
Gee Scottie dog now you tell us the truth?? Does this mean we get to smack you in the nose with, not the rolled up newspaper, but rather the rolled up two by four.
Thanks you fucking piece of shit, thanks for helping destroy the constitution.
On second thought thanks for nothing pond-scum.
Same as it ever was.
Same as it ever was.
Who cares about impeachment when TREASON is what that is?
Wonder how the CIA feels about this? And the military?
"Why are we not talking about impeachment again?"
-Because Pelosi and Reid are gutless.
Because Nancy Pelosi has spoken!
Actually, Speaker Pelosi is pretty much forced to assume a counter-impeachment position. Because —
1) It wouldn't make much sense to impeach President Figurehead and force President Cheney to keep being Prez.
2) If both Presidents are impeached the next in line is Speaker Pelosi.
So Pelosi cannot be the organizing force behind impeachment. There is a huge conflict of interest. Ideally an impeachment resolution should driven by someone with no chance of ever being president. Someone like, oh, Dennis Kucinich.
Whoever it is will need a lot of support.
black dog barking - impeach Cheney first, then Dear Leader can nominate a sane ReThug to replace him (if that is possible), then impeach Dear Leader
Yeah!! You piece of scum no wonder this country is turmoil!! Repulicans are lying thru there teeth and the Democrats have no backbone. Disgusting
I think the future holds even more "talkers", not that what he says is not true, like everyone is already saying, it's not that big of a story, we already knew the Administration were liars, but, now we have a witness in court, yeah I know, I'm in fantasyland......
IMPEACH!
waterboard scotty?
I find it interesting that Scott McCellan's pulisher is also Soros's. It makes me question the credibility of the book.
This Guy is out to make money now about "lies" we all have heard of already.I find it interesting how now a days people would rather make a quick buck then be loyal. No matter who it is your being loyal to.
Commenting by HaloScan
