I don't think Michael is innocent. But what exactly is the "BIG DIFFERENCE" between "innocent" and "not guilty." Symantically speaking, how can a person be both not guilty and not innocent? What exactly lies between?
My two cents: Innocent means that a person could not possibly have committed the crime they were charged with. Without a doubt. Jackson is "not guilty" thanks to reasonable doubt. Which, as I'm sure you know, means that the state didn't present a convincing enough case to erase any of that reasonable doubt. And that sucks.
The jury stated in interview that they felt Jackson probably was a pedophile, but the state's case regarding that particular accuser was crap. A few of the jurors were weeping while the verdict was read. That says a lot right there.
As an aside, Cassandra, your husband is hot! 
I am a very lucky girl. He does dishes too. ;P
Commenting by HaloScan
