This requires a 180 grain veto.
Yogimus | Email | Homepage | 12.30.05 - 11:27 am | #

Strikes me as a gun *with* these is not a gun, and therefor does not need to be registered. I guess the little ring on the finger device would qualify...

Stupid bastards are trying to sneak a lot by, including the ability to sue. When all gun owners leave, and all they are left with are the criminals, violence WILL go up. Like every other place in the world. Every time.
Combat Controller | Email | Homepage | 12.30.05 - 11:17 pm | #

Never before now have I really believed that my state of Texas was actually composed of more intelligent, well-adjusted people than those of the Northeast. I literally cannot understand a people who would pass such a thing. If I were a murderer/rapist/armed-robber/burglar, I would move to Massachusetts immediately. Life will be sweet and bountiful there, for a violent criminal.

*sigh*
Gadfly | Email | Homepage | 01.01.06 - 1:57 am | #

Could you publish the authors of the bill and their offices? Contact information?
robert | Email | Homepage | 01.01.06 - 5:38 pm | #

Chris, I've been following this piece of shit. The house floor on Beacon Hill recently sent it back to committee. If the bill makes it out of committee again, it is said to have very little support. Even the "light" moonbats are considering voting against it. As for the sponsor, I *believe* it is State Rep Toomey. I also think that Bruce @ mAss Backwards has a post about this.
Brad | Email | Homepage | 01.03.06 - 5:11 am | #

I would think the presence of Smith and Wesson as one of the largest employers in western Mass alone would kill it.
Chris Byrne | Email | Homepage | 01.03.06 - 8:05 am | #

Hell, Daley's getting ready to turn Illinois into a no gun zone.

Or, he's trying to.
skaramine | Email | Homepage | 01.04.06 - 8:59 pm | #