Newshoggers Comments
I agree, just as soon as CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, LAT, Boston Globe etc etc etc start taking money from the DNC istead of being their spokesmen for free. Im just sayin'
Hi Blair,
Heh, that's funny.
The Right has long maintained that the media are liberal-biased but we liberals don't see much evidence of it. What we see is a media that, by and large, are happy to reprint their briefings from "undisclosed official sources" verbatim without any further investigation. Or happy to print the coordinated opinionerring of Benador Associates writers and others as if each was a true independent voice.
It's the laziness that annoys me about most of the MSM, not the bias. Where exactly is the adverserial Fourth Estate that the founders wanted when such reprinting is done wholesale?
On the other hand, I'm originally from the UK where every newspaper and cable station has an admitted preference for Left or Right and everyone knows what each papers preferences are. The Guardian is Left of Blair, the Telegraph is to the Right of Genghiz Khan, The Times supports whoever promises Murdoch the biggest tax break - that kind of thing. I suppose the "Fair and Balanced" sticks in my craw as such an obvious falsehood.
Regards, C
Fox is already in the White House, the only benefit of a Fox propagandist as the spokesperson would be to confirm what we have known all along _ Fox fabricates for the White House.
Murdock did not become a citizen by being a Democrat and pay back was expected by the Republicans which he will continue to deliver over and over again no matter what criticism is directed at his propaganda empire.
Hey, congrats on the WaPo Kurtz link to this piece. You're really moving up in the world, Cernig!
Commenting by HaloScan
