Newshoggers Comments
"Sitting in the Oval Office has never magically transformed anyone into a paragon of virtue."
Thanks for the laugh. That was a good line. I hope you're right about Texas.
it seems like the Clinton team is pulling back to Ohio. Always falling back to a new line of defense, possibly prioritizing to break Obama's winning stretch, and thus his momentum. But essentially they're just giving up on states one by one.
The Statue of Liberty stills stands: Men made her and the statue is a perfect example of Men behind Women!!!
HILLARY IS A GODDESS OF FREEDOM LIKE THE STATUE OF LIBERTY~
THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS A WOMAN NOT A MAN! Why is freedom symbolized by a woman?
IMAGINE THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IN THE LIKENESS OF HILLARY and THE WORLD WILL WITNESS the TRUE POWER OF FREEDOM IN ACTION
THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS HILLARY IN ACTION~
Woman are peacemakers, protectors, caretakers and givers of life, hope and truth.
Would the statue of liberty have the same power to inspire and liberate if IT WAS A SYMBOL OF A MAN?
If the statue was a man would it hold the torch of freedom?
Men are violent by nature. They love to play war games. Men love to fight, mame and kill. Their first natural reaction to conflict is to fight.
Think about it? Would there be WARS if the world was made up of women? Would there be Wars if the world was runned by women?
Men love symbols that represent war: war games, guns, knives. blood. They give movie titles names like “THERE WILL BE BLOOD”. Men create the wars and women and chidren suffer and die. Unfortunately men die too. Men destroy themselves.
IF YOU A LOOKING FOR REAL CHANGE HIRE A WOMAN FOR THE NEXT AMERICAN PRESIDENT. HILLARY IS A WOMAN! PEACE WILL NEVER HAPPEN WITH A MAN IN CHARGE - THERE WILL ONLY BE MORE OF THE SAME.
America grasp this Golden opportunity “To wittness and experience the Statue of Liberty in Action”
I wonder if Angelspeaks ever reads Jon Swift.
"Would there be WARS if the world was made up of women?"
Ask Margaret Thatcher, as warthirsty a person as ever held democratically elected office. 
Regards, C
I'm a real volunteer for Hillary and every person I've spoken to except for 3 (of about 30) said they were voting or had already voted for Hillary. This is in contrast to the polls.
I just have to say, again, why I'm voting for her. I'm 37, a mother of two, a female scientist, and I work at a national lab. I would NEVER hire someone like Obama with so little experience, I would tell him to go get some experience and come back and see me in a few years. Hillary, I would hire hands down. I compared their resumes, it's a no-brainer to me. It's clear they are both "politicians" that both have had their scandals (the more we hear of Obama the more scandals we hear - and she has 16 years on him!)
So please everyone, vote with your brain and hire the best person you think would fill this position, whomever that might be. Don't just vote for the popular one or the one who can give a great speech.
interesting predictions cernig - good for you for having the guts to say it well infront of anyone else, and for listing solid reasons for why you believe as you do.
i have no idea how super tuesday pt2 will play out, but i like that you're not wishy washy.
I stronly feel that if Americans actually vote Senator Hillary Clinton as the next President of United States of American, I really question the intelligence of all Americans. One really has to remember what Mr and Mrs Clintons (I always refer the Clinton's family as the " Family of Clowns")had brough so much great shame to the White House and the prestige of the Presidency of the United States. Mrs Clinton is a very " calculative woman"--women who sympathise with her for being such a forgiving woman( Mr Clinton's infamous affair) are being manupulated by her. Mrs Clinton has a greater agenda up her mind: using her husband's former position to rocket her to the presidency. Would be great to watch if Mrs Clinton still clings to her marriage once her well-planned ambition of being the First Woman to become the President of United States of America just fades away painfully...all those years of cunning planning just go down the toilet.
Clinton claims that she is more experienced and seasoned. What exactly has she done to improve the American quality of life in the twenty years in office? Not much. Healthcare has been her issue. It never has been implemented. Now, her grand plan is to make it mandatory for all. Is this like mandatory car insurance. Do you make enough money as it is to take on another mandatory debt obligation? If Clinton is such a qualified candidate, why is her presentation so focused on the other contending candidate. Here achievements and her claim as a leader and advocate of the masses is patently false. She has contrived designs to the White House for the better part of twenty years. She is a partner to the offshoring of American jobs and the demise of the American economy. All the independent women out there, learn the issues, read the issues, use some deductive reasoning, and come to the understanding that she is not fit to be president of this country. She will not be a good leader. Leaders in the Middle East will not respect her, and American will remain with the impression of being illegitimate. The truth hurts, but that is the story. Obama has run a cleaner campaign and more substance. People like him. I like the way he has campaigned. I will wait to cast the vote, because there are other good messages coming out from Obama, Nader, and Ron Paul. But, Clinton is a bought and paid for corporate Democrat. Do not be fooled. She is a backbiter and schemer. This is not the character traits you want to lead America. Think it through. It is plain as daylight.
Commenting by HaloScan
