Pravda Ne'eman
"mr. faggot religious lawyer"..."sleezy orthodox lawyer..."
boy, he could tell all that from one post?
good for you guys for not bothering to respond to him (yet, at least). you don't even need to for the moment--he's done a good job for you on his own.
This is hilarious! He complains of defamation and demands an apology while simultaneously defaming someone else. I am guessing that his defense for this is the highly esteemed "well, he started it!" defense.
Quote: "logical error of comparing a legal code in a religion that's meant to regulate every aspect of a person's life to a legal code in a free society"
Umm. OK. I'm not as smart as SJ, so please spell this one out for me. A priori, which document would one expect to be the longer one?
I hate to nitpick, but the official title of the publication is The New York Times not New York Times. They take their definite article very seriously -- kind of like how the folks in El Salvador get pissed off when you call the place "Salvador."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New.../
New_York_Times
Now would probably be as good a time as any to point out that it is good to hear that you are not a professional blogger, SJ, and to make the earnest recommendation that you not quit your day job any time soon.
when i first read your blog review i thought you were being too hard on SJ - amongst the crimes against the English language he seemed to make a few salient observations. but his riposte to your devastating review have undone whatever credibility he had in my eyes :
I am not on a mission to save the jews from self inflicted fascism, but merely to voice my opinion and ridicule all the crap that's going on.
at least he managed to spell "fascism". those who spell "antisemitic" - "anti-semetic" as SJ does - should be flogged.
So by the way, mr. faggot religious lawyer
one of the things that i expect from a true "frei denker", or at least someone who claims to be open-minded is not using disgusting homophobic slurs. after all, don't you find orthodox homophobia and hypocrisy on this subject infuriating? anyway, all he's done is expose the fact that he is an angry, sexually-frustrated adolescent.
the only thing worse than a sleezy lawyer is a sleezy orthodox lawyer.
"sleezy", though misspelled twice in the same sentence, is not as cardinal an offence as "anti-semetic". a sleazy lawyer, however, is a sleazy lawyer, and the gradation of their awfulness is not dependent on their religion.
Sometimes I wonder if it's better to leave sociopaths alone in their corner of cyberspace and hope that they go away,
or to expose them and hope that after everyone has seen them, people will stop giving them reason to continue blogging.
wow...
I mean, you just posted his post on your blog and didn't even have to respond.
read my blog now losers. XD
I knew it was about a girl from the beginning. The whole "Say no to shomer negiah" gave it away. I say she's one of the ones in the picture on his site.
Yes Garnel, make everything better by making fun of women.
Commenting by HaloScan
