Oh the humanity! (humanselfness?)


He messed up on the grapes though - a politically correct diety wouldn't trample nonunion grapes.


I think that's why they are grapes "of wrath"? I think.


This is really old hat, guys--my college religion professors were talking about "God Godself" thirty years ago at the Yale Divinity School. The parodies were already blooming that long ago, too: The Yale Divinity School had a little "alternative" tongue-in-cheek newsletter called "Eschatology Today" (Motto: "All's well that ends.") I still recall an article explaining how we could nip all this theological "gender inclusive language" debate in the bud with new Trinitarian language--replacing "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit" with mathematical terms: "X sub-1, X sub-2, and X sub-3." Simple enough! I wrote a piece about the demythologization of Santa Claus, though I never submitted it. In any case, come on, guys. If you're going to lament, at least lament fashionably. "God Godself" is about as scandalously envelope-pushing as miniskirts and fishnet stockings.


Guess it takes a while for stuff like this to work its way from New Haven to Missouri. It was the first I'd heard it, although it's indicative of a bit of an Episcopal trend. We had a seminarian at the parish a while back who referred to God as "She" every so often.


Mark, I'm not sure I'd call it "winning".

My condolances, Chris. Zach has experienced Zachself the terrible slaughter of innocent pronouns.


peace,


Who can forget the Mankowski "Chinese menu" parody of Scripture speak in whichone took randm words from columnc a, B, C and made profoundly meaningless phrases like "Luke-Acts hermeneutic paradigm". It ran in FIRST THINGS.

But the Jebbies now see to it that Mankowski doesn't write for general consumption.


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ? 

 

Commenting by HaloScan