Did you read the article?

"It appears, in other words, as there are some people who have replaced children with animals. In both circumstances, it is sex with defenceless individuals."

Perhaps you're incapable of differentiating between pedophilia, bestiality, and homosexuality, but that would say more about you than about them. Even the good vet in the story appreciates the difference - why can't you?


What? Where did Mark say anything about homosexuality in this post? All he is doing is defending the lifestyle choice of man-animal love, which if you don't like, you can join the Christian right or something. Really. Bigot.

I could be wrong.


andy,
Maybe I missed the part where Mark said this is related to homosexuality. I think what he is saying is that, according to certain philosophical viewpoints, we can't say these Swedes are wrong - we can't impose our beliefs.
And bestaility has its defenders. Peter Singer has argued that sex with certain species of animals is allowable. Isn't it hateful to deny him his relationships?
Certainly you must agree.


Legalized in 1944? Boy, the Swedes are ahead of the libertine game, aren't they?


Note the interesting line of argument in the article: forbidding kiddie porn has forced people to resort to bestiality.

It has interesting paralells in the anti-celibacy/gay marriage discussion.


Andy:

You need to read Peter Singer. Your provincial morals are way behind the times. I understand if you are one of those irrational people who measures morality by their feelings and some unknowable "ick" factor. But truly sophisticated people use reason, not feeling, to make such choices. As long as both individuals feel happy, I think the love that dare not bleat, moo, bark, or oink its name is to be celebrated and I will not stand for your hate speech here.


A traveling salesman knocks on the door of a shepherd's cottage and a little boy answers:

TS - "Hi little boy is your mummy or daddy home?"

LB - "Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

But seriously, why is it any surprise that in a culture that has abandoned the worship of God for the most part has given itself over the worship of pleasure? I am starting to wonder it the need to worship something is stronger in our natures than the need for food and water.


"what I am saying is that one can see the evolution of trust and cooperation in communities other than humans." -- andy, in a post from yesterday.

What was that about a good vet, andy?


"We have seen an increase since 1999 when child pornography became illegal"

Do they really mean child porn was legal in Sweden up until 1999!?!?

I have a hard time buying this, but it seems to be what is implied. Any Swedes listening?


I wonder if Sweden measures the beast's age of consent in dog years.


Holy Cow!!!

Sorry....

Kathleen


Mark,

The last line of the article says it all...

The logicians of "if we got rid of priestly celibacy, none of this would happen!" seem to be at work again, inasmuch as they're blaming laws against child molestation for the sexual abuse of animals. "If we only got rid of the child sex laws, none of this would happen!"

The question of the day is, of course, how the hell does Matt Drudge find this crap?


The question of the day is, of course, how the hell does Matt Drudge find this crap?

I for one don't want to know.


I think the Swedes have too much time on their hands.


So how would a member of PETA who supports the right to non-species specific civil unions come down on this one? Gives whole new meaning to "animal lover," doesn't it.


Well I would be suprised if the Mass. SJC wouldn't grant PETA's request for interspecies "marriage," there seems to be a fire sale over there in that regard.


The fact that animal sex is becoming an increasing problem can be indicated by the mere fact that there is an increasing selection of animal porn at video rentals and there an increasingly number of websites with animal pornography is surfacing.

Animal porn?

Animal porn?

I could have gone for the rest of my life quite happily without knowing that animal porn exists.

best regards,


I could have gone for the rest of my life quite happily without knowing that animal porn exists.

Hasn't the FBI been cracking down on kittie porn sites?


I hope you get scrached for that one Stephen!


Well, if sexual intercourse is supposed to be a renewal of the marriage covenant (JP2 - Theology of the Body), given freely (i.e. both parties are capable of consent), open to life, and chastely (within marriage) then beastiality, pedophilia, homosexuality, adultery, fornication and contraception are the same sin.

Beastiality -- gives new meaning to the term "heavy petting".


1) Cats...

2) What exactly was their rationale for decriminalizing sex with animals?!


I'd like to see the guy who tried to take indecent liberties with one of MY (boy) kitties . . .


Heh heh. Serve him right, too, every ripped and shredded inch o'flesh! (Not to mention his probably punctured ear drums.)

And then there's the damage my CAT would inflict on him, too!


It seems to me that this is an opportunity for Bishop Reg Cawcutt, the erstwhile St. Sebastian's Angel, to minister to a new, um, flock.


Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places. In our tradition the State is not omnipresent in the home. And there are other spheres of our lives and existence, outside the home, where the State should not be a dominant presence. Freedom extends beyond spatial bounds. Liberty presumes an autonomy of self that includes freedom of thought, belief, expression, and certain intimate conduct. The instant case involves liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions.

Justice Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas


What really got me was the implication that all this animal sexploitation was because child porn was made illegal. Apparently, if we just had liberal enough laws, these poor animals would not suffer so.


Human beings are beastlier than animals.

Fortunately for animals, they live in the present. The memory and effects of cruelty to a child go on for a lifetime.


You are all just intolerant. Why do you have to continue to commit your hate crimes!HATE CRIMES!

Didn't Pascal say something about man being so base that he would bow down before statues of animals, and worship them? I wonder how this fits into that.... Trading a natural relationship with the image of God for...Mr. Ed. Is man more base than Pascal imagined?

I could be wrong.

P.S. In/tolerance" and "diversity" are terms the "left" controls for thier own uses, don't expect them to have either an objective or stbale definition.


"Peter Singer has argued that sex with certain species of animals is allowable."

As long as the animal consents.

bwaahaaaaaahaaa!!


Oops. I meant "baaaaaa".


stbale=stable


Jamie,

I thought he was patron saint of Alfalfa farmers.


Franklin,

No, the patron saint of posting bonds in judicial court!


you are abully, you are the horrible man banning gyas, you are the horrible man restricting gays, from rights that all men and women must have, thyou are thje horrible man, who supports teh burning of gays, it is unbeluibvgable that the nazi catholic church can go around supporting bullying of gays for doing a totally inoffensive act, that it can go aroubn asaying ays are weirdoes, and abnormla, and when gays fight backl, and say they are not abnormal, that they are not weirdoes, ayou then claim you are being bullied, and call them nazis, for claiming they have rights to marry, and to be in the church, even celibate gays are now goping to be banned from being in the chucrh by this horrible pope, a former member of the ss, it is utterly insane how horrible he is, that he supports arniold scwarternigger, a man who supports abortion and who was a bully in school, that he supports bullies, that he defends people about to be exwecuted for murder but that he calls, gays, wwridoes, like the bully in teh playground who bullies, the boy who is weak, and short and calls him gay, orthe bully in the playgrouind who calls a gay boy a weirdo, and wait for it "abnormal" of course gays should fight back against a horrible pope like this, the media image of the poep, and the chucrh is that they are all nice pweop,le, we are told from school priests and policemen, and all these people, are all nice people, it turns oput on closer inxsepection, that the police and priets are just like everybody else, excwept they have dictatorial power, in places like brazil, they have deaths squads which kills transvestites, andf gays, the pope is a horrible man, who calls gays weirdoes, what should gays, do, should they say thank you, we will not critise wthe pope, for calling us weirdoes, that would be such a nazi thing to do, tel;l, and what about that ki9d who wears glasses in pol pots' cambodia, what a horrible nazi he is for saying to pol pot that he should not be executed, how dare he, he should just accept that human sacrfice and hating gays are part of religon, and hating agys, and bullying gays, is just totally nattal, i hate you horrible catholic bullies, you arr unbeluivable in that you shout abuse at gays, and ban them from tyhis, and that, and incxrease nbannibvg of gays, and appeal to thugs, and ignore passes of the bible that say do not eat shellfish, dop not cut your hair, the only bit you lisetn to, is the hating gays,k bit, and you seriosly think that banniong aysm from this and that is nopt bu7llying, andf that gays fighting back against you is "bullying" you are thje bullies, tyou are horrible people, if the pope opposes materialism, and indivudalism, why does he live in a palace, he opposes hatem, why does he not condemn people who kill gays,


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ? 

 

Commenting by HaloScan